England, Scotland, Wales
In Hoyland v Asda Stores Ltd the Court of Session upheld the EAT's decision that a pro rata reduction of a bonus to reflect an employee's absence on ordinary maternity leave was not sex discrimination. Although the bonus was expressed to be "discretionary", the Court of Session found that it was regulated by the contract of employment. As such, it fell within section 6(6) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1976 (SDA) which excludes claims relating to pay from the scope of the SDA.
The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.
A free trial will give you:
Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Six issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area