Burke v British Council; ADT Fire and Security PLC v Speyer; Cameron v NAAFI UKEAT/0125/06/DA; 0126/06/DA and 0124/06/DA | Practical Law

Burke v British Council; ADT Fire and Security PLC v Speyer; Cameron v NAAFI UKEAT/0125/06/DA; 0126/06/DA and 0124/06/DA | Practical Law

The EAT in the conjoined cases of Burke v British Council, ADT Fire & Security PLC v Speyer and Cameron v NAAFI applied Lawson v Serco Ltd to two particular sets of circumstances and considered the issues where an employee is employed in Germany under the NATO agreement and argued that his employer is an emanation of the state and a public authority.

Burke v British Council; ADT Fire and Security PLC v Speyer; Cameron v NAAFI UKEAT/0125/06/DA; 0126/06/DA and 0124/06/DA

Published on 14 Dec 2006England, Scotland, Wales
The EAT in the conjoined cases of Burke v British Council, ADT Fire & Security PLC v Speyer and Cameron v NAAFI applied Lawson v Serco Ltd to two particular sets of circumstances and considered the issues where an employee is employed in Germany under the NATO agreement and argued that his employer is an emanation of the state and a public authority.