Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals | Practical Law
https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I9a7ce9d0e84d11e398db8b09b4f043e0/Right-of-way-on-foot-and-with-vehicles-did-not-include-a-right-to-drive-animals?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
In Alford v Hannaford [2011] EWCA Civ 1099, the Court of Appeal held that a transfer which granted a right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals.
Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
US Home
Global Home
NEW
Sign in
Sign in
All content
Search:
Search Westlaw
Search Tips
Advanced
Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals
Practical Law UK Legal Update 0-509-2400
(Approx. 3 pages)
Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals
by
Practical Law Agriculture & Rural Land
Related Content
Published on 19 Oct 2011
•
England,
Wales
In
Alford v Hannaford [2011] EWCA Civ 1099
, the Court of Appeal held that a transfer which granted a right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals.