Quia timet injunction sought prematurely in rights to light Crossrail dispute

In CIP Property (AIPT) Limited v Transport for London and others [2012] EWHC 259 (Ch), the High Court considered the merits of an application for a quia timet injunction to preserve rights to light said to be threatened by the Crossrail development.

PLC Dispute Resolution


The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area

Log in using Practical Law username

Only use this login if you have not set up OnePass for Practical Law

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247604309677", "objName" : "Quia timet injunction sought prematurely in rights to light Cros", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://us.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/us/resource/0-518-4273?q=&qp=&qo=&qe=", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "22e97be00:15b190ba19c:-4119", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "22e97be00:15b190ba19c:-4118", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }