Kelley Drye: Recent Decision Applies Prior Substantiation Doctrine to Bar False Advertising Claims Based on Lack of Substantiation | Practical Law

Kelley Drye: Recent Decision Applies Prior Substantiation Doctrine to Bar False Advertising Claims Based on Lack of Substantiation | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP discusses Stanley v. Bayer Healthcare, LLC, No. 3:11-cv-00862, (S.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012), a case where the Southern District of California held that an alleged lack of substantiation for an advertising representation is insufficient to state a claim under the California Unfair Competition Law or Consumer Legal Remedies Act. The publication discusses the case's factual background and the court's legal holdings. 

Kelley Drye: Recent Decision Applies Prior Substantiation Doctrine to Bar False Advertising Claims Based on Lack of Substantiation

by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Published on 30 Apr 2012 • California
This Law Firm Publication by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP discusses Stanley v. Bayer Healthcare, LLC, No. 3:11-cv-00862, (S.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012), a case where the Southern District of California held that an alleged lack of substantiation for an advertising representation is insufficient to state a claim under the California Unfair Competition Law or Consumer Legal Remedies Act. The publication discusses the case's factual background and the court's legal holdings.