ISDA® Documentation: Still Relevant in the Dodd-Frank Era? | Practical Law

ISDA® Documentation: Still Relevant in the Dodd-Frank Era? | Practical Law

A look at how the transition from a bilateral, over-the-counter (OTC) swaps market to one populated by an increasing segment of cleared and exchange traded transactions will impact the world's central swaps and derivatives body, ISDA, and use of its popular standardized trading documentation.

ISDA® Documentation: Still Relevant in the Dodd-Frank Era?

Practical Law Legal Update 0-532-7125 (Approx. 5 pages)

ISDA® Documentation: Still Relevant in the Dodd-Frank Era?

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 02 Jul 2013USA (National/Federal)
A look at how the transition from a bilateral, over-the-counter (OTC) swaps market to one populated by an increasing segment of cleared and exchange traded transactions will impact the world's central swaps and derivatives body, ISDA, and use of its popular standardized trading documentation.
Over-the-counter (OTC) transactions such as interest rate swaps, credit default swaps (CDS) and total return swaps have traditionally been entered into bilaterally, between two parties, using documentation published by ISDA®. However, in light of the financial crisis, which OTC derivatives were blamed for exacerbating, regulators in the US and globally have begun to move much of the OTC derivatives market onto exchanges and into clearinghouses (see Practice Note, Summary of the Dodd-Frank Act: Swaps and Derivatives: Swap Clearing and Exchange Trading under Title VII). It would stand to reason that this tectonic shift in the way derivatives are transacted would impact the need for and use of ISDA documentation.
In practice, only those derivatives contracts that are truly "standardized" will be able to be cleared until the industry has developed adequate technology to overcome relevant operational hurdles. To date, only certain interest rate swaps and CDS must be cleared (see Legal Update, Final Clearing Determination for CDS and Interest Rate Swaps Issued by CFTC), though that represents a large segment of those markets. How much of the OTC derivatives market is ultimately moved onto exchanges and through clearinghouses, and the extent to which the use of bilateral ISDA documentation is replaced by clearing documentation, remains to be seen. But changes to the way swaps and derivatives transactions are documented have already arrived. In response, ISDA has taken a number of steps to remain relevant in the Dodd-Frank era, focusing on market solutions such as protocols and standardized clearing, execution and margin collateral segregation template documents, discussed below.
To date, however, bilateral ISDA documentation remains the dominant documentation platform for the derivatives market, most of which remains uncleared. The ISDA Master, ISDA Schedule, transaction confirmation and CSA will likely continue to play a prominent role in documenting swaps and derivatives trades even after Title VII is fully implemented. ISDA will likely release a new version of its Master Agreement that is designed to address documentational issues created by applicable regulations such as Dodd-Frank. In the meantime, ISDA has released its first Dodd-Frank Protocols to facilitate compliance with the initial wave of final, effective Title VII rules for swap dealers (SDs) and major swap participants (MSPs) (see The ISDA Dodd-Frank Protocol). Further, the ISDA clearing addendum has become the market standard document used to supplement the futures account agreements used by derivatives exchange members and clearinghouse clearing members to govern cleared and exchange-traded derivatives (see The ISDA-FIA Cleared Derivatives Addendum).
Even in the swap clearing era under Dodd-Frank and European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), parties will continue to use existing ISDA documentation for derivatives transactions that:

The ISDA Dodd-Frank Protocol

In the meantime, ISDA has released its first two Dodd-Frank Protocols, the August 2012 Dodd-Frank Protocol (August Protocol) and Dodd-Frank Protocol 2.0, or March 2013 Protocol (together with the August Protocol, the Dodd-Frank Protocol) to facilitate compliance with final Title VII business conduct rules for SDs and MSPs. The Dodd-Frank Protocol can be used by parties to existing ISDA Masters to amend their ISDA Masters to comply with certain effective Dodd-Frank rules. For detailed information on the Dodd-Frank Protocol, see Practice Note, The ISDA Dodd-Frank Protocol.

The ISDA-FIA Cleared Derivatives Addendum

Banks and dealers (which are now required under Title VII to be futures commission merchants (FCMs) in order to enter into a cleared swap with a customer on a registered exchange) typically use their standard futures clearing agreements to govern cleared swaps arrangements with their customers. These agreements:
  • Are not heavily negotiated, as the customer has little negotiating leverage if it wishes to enter into the cleared transaction.
  • Typically contain extensive margining provisions for the customer but not for the dealer.
Regardless of which document is used to document margin collateral matters for a derivatives transaction in the Dodd-Frank era, its terms will be to a large extent predetermined by:
  • Applicable clearinghouse rules, in the case of a cleared transaction, which will be subject to Dodd-Frank (or other applicable) swaps regulations on cleared swaps margin collateral and other cleared swaps margin collateral matters.
  • Dodd-Frank (or other applicable) swaps regulations on margin collateral matters for uncleared swaps.
Because these agreements cover futures and not swaps, they need to be modified by the parties to apply to cleared swaps transactions. Because there was no standard manner of supplementing in-house futures agreements to adapt them to cleared swaps trading, ISDA and the Futures Industry Association (FIA) published a standardized clearing addendum, the ISDA-FIA Cleared Derivatives Addendum, to be used in connection with in-house futures agreements. The market has been receptive to this document, which has helped to facilitate the transition to the cleared swaps era.
The clearing addendum is an optional template which can be used by FCMs (clearing members of derivatives clearinghouses) and their customers for documenting their relationship with respect to cleared OTC derivatives. It is designed to supplement a futures and options agreement. The addendum:
  • Includes representations for each party on certain clearing-related matters.
  • Sets out the close-out methodology for cleared OTC swaps, the triggers for liquidation and provisions for valuing terminated trades.
  • Contains provisions governing tax issues for cleared OTC transactions.
The clearing addendum may be and often is customized by the parties and includes a schedule that parties can use to make additional representations or otherwise modify the terms of the addendum. FIA and ISDA also acknowledge that the addendum may need to be altered as a result of future regulations. Approximately 30 institutions on both the buy side (derivatives customers such as funds and end users) and sell side (derivatives dealers) contributed to the drafting of the addendum.

ISDA Tri-party Custodial Agreement

Under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, if a swap transaction is ineligible for clearing, and one party to the swap is designated as an SD, MSP, security-based swap dealer (SBSD) or major security-based swap participant (MSBSP), the SD, MSP, SBSD or MSBSP party must notify its counterparty that the counterparty has the right to require the segregation of initial margin collateral (referred to in the CSA as the independent amount or "IA") with an independent third-party custodian. Certain other proposed Title VII swap margin collateral rules would also require segregation of initial margin collateral. ISDA has therefore published a standard agreement template (ISDA ACA) for the segregation with an independent third-party custodian (securities intermediary) of initial margin collateral, as required by these rules. For details, see Legal Update, ISDA Publishes Account Control Agreement Template for Initial Margin Segregation.
In December 2011, ISDA published a sample amendment (Sample Tri-Party IA Provisions) designed to be used by parties looking to accommodate these same rules in their ISDA documents. The Sample Tri-Party IA Provisions may also be used by parties to new or existing uncleared OTC derivatives transactions entered into under an ISDA Master and New York law CSA (see Legal Update, ISDA Publishes Sample "IA" Custodial Provisions Reflecting Impact of Dodd-Frank on Collateral Arrangements. However, initial market reaction suggests the ISDA ACA is likely to become the market standard document to be used in response to Title VII initial margin segregation rules.

Clearing Documentation and Use of the ISDA Credit Support Annex

Because the margin collateral rules of the applicable clearinghouse apply to cleared derivatives transactions, there will be reduced need for the current ISDA CSA as more and more derivatives transactions that have historically been entered into bilaterally are cleared. Clearinghouse rules typically specify amounts of initial margin collateral and variation margin collateral that must be posted by the parties to a cleared derivatives transaction. Other terms traditionally specified in a bilaterally negotiated CSA, such as margin collateral segregation and rehypothecation, are the subject of proposed and final Dodd-Frank rulemaking. These rules are or will need to be reflected in applicable clearing documentation (see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives Margin Collateral Rules: Segregation of Cleared Swap Customer Collateral).
Margin collateral posting for uncleared swaps entered into with banks and bank holding companies (together, covered swap entities or CSEs) is also the subject of proposed Dodd-Frank rulemaking. These matters have historically been governed by the relevant CSA. But these rules will ultimately set parameters for minimum amounts of collateral that must be posted by most swaps trading entities, including commercial end users of derivatives, based on the type of entity and its creditworthiness. Final Dodd-Frank margin collateral rules for uncleared swaps are also likely to include minimum eligibility requirements. There will, therefore, be less room for negotiation of these terms in swap collateral documents such as the CSA. Though CSAs may continue to be useful for specifying margin collateral levels and collateral eligibility within the parameters set by regulators. For details on proposed and final Dodd-Frank margin collateral rules, see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives Margin Collateral Rules: Dodd-Frank Margin Collateral Collection Proposals.

The Standard Credit Support Annex

On June 10, 2013, ISDA published a new Standard Credit Support Annex (SCSA), which is designed to standardize and universalize derivatives collateral mechanics. The SCSA attempts to more closely align the collateral mechanics and economics of uncleared swaps with those of cleared swaps. The SCSA appears to be ISDA's response to the reduced need for the CSA in the Dodd-Frank era. There remain significant impediments to global adoption of the SCSA, however. For more information on the SCSA, see Legal Update, Standard Credit Support Annex for OTC Derivatives Published by ISDA.
"ISDA" is a registered trademark of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA). ISDA is not a sponsor of Practical Law and had no part in the development of this resource.