Expert Q&A on Trends in Lactation Breaks and Discrimination Litigation | Practical Law

Expert Q&A on Trends in Lactation Breaks and Discrimination Litigation | Practical Law

An expert Q&A with Sarah Andrews of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP on the implications of the US Court  of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's decision in Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and other legal trends in lactation breaks and lactation discrimination litigation.

Expert Q&A on Trends in Lactation Breaks and Discrimination Litigation

Practical Law Legal Update 0-570-3085 (Approx. 4 pages)

Expert Q&A on Trends in Lactation Breaks and Discrimination Litigation

by Practical Law Labor & Employment
Law stated as of 03 Jun 2014USA (National/Federal)
An expert Q&A with Sarah Andrews of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP on the implications of the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's decision in Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and other legal trends in lactation breaks and lactation discrimination litigation.
Risks associated with an employer's failure to accommodate an employee with lactation needs are increasing. Employers must understand their legal obligations in this area to avoid the risks of both litigation and liability, especially since recent litigation has opened the door for a cause of action based on lactation discrimination under Title VII.
Practical law asked Sarah Andrews of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, who counsels employers on compliance with lactation laws, to discuss the implications of key cases in this area and best practices for employers.