Ogletree Deakins: California Appellate Court Rules California Prevailing Wage Law Does Not Apply to Off-site Fabrication | Practical Law

Ogletree Deakins: California Appellate Court Rules California Prevailing Wage Law Does Not Apply to Off-site Fabrication | Practical Law

This wage and hour Law Firm Publication by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. discusses the California Court of Appeal's decision in Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 104 v. Duncan and Russ Will Mechanical, Inc. In Russ Will, the court concluded that a subcontractor's fabrication of materials for a public works project at a permanent, offsite manufacturing facility not exclusively dedicated to the public works project was not covered under Section 1772 California prevailing wage law because the work was not done in the execution of the contract.

Ogletree Deakins: California Appellate Court Rules California Prevailing Wage Law Does Not Apply to Off-site Fabrication

by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Published on 19 Sep 2014California, United States
This wage and hour Law Firm Publication by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. discusses the California Court of Appeal's decision in Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 104 v. Duncan and Russ Will Mechanical, Inc. In Russ Will, the court concluded that a subcontractor's fabrication of materials for a public works project at a permanent, offsite manufacturing facility not exclusively dedicated to the public works project was not covered under Section 1772 California prevailing wage law because the work was not done in the execution of the contract.