GC Agenda China: August 2015 | Practical Law

GC Agenda China: August 2015 | Practical Law

A look back at the last month's legal developments for general counsel (GC) working on China-related matters and for their advisers. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.

GC Agenda China: August 2015

Practical Law UK Articles 0-618-3687 (Approx. 9 pages)

GC Agenda China: August 2015

by Brad Herrold, Consultant and Practical Law China
Law stated as at 26 Aug 2015China
A look back at the last month's legal developments for general counsel (GC) working on China-related matters and for their advisers. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
The August 2015 edition of GC Agenda China is the seventeenth in the series.

Speedread

A look back at the last month's legal developments for general counsel working on China-related matters and for their advisers. GC Agenda China identifies and investigates the key issues affecting businesses, provides insight from leading practitioners and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
This month's GC Agenda covers, among other matters, the 2015 implementing rules for regulations on foreign-invested banks, the SPC jurisdiction rules on CIETAC and former CIETAC sub-commissions, the extension nationwide of the Shanghai FTZ's policy of allowing finance leasing companies to conduct commercial factoring and the new SPC judicial interpretation upholding non-bank private lending.

SAIC releases draft internet advertising measures for public comment

On 1 July 2015, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) issued the Interim Measures for Supervision and Administration over Internet Advertising (Draft) for public comment. The draft follows the recent government trend towards protecting consumer rights and broadly applies to all commercial presentations made through the internet (and mobile internet), including traditional advertising, as well as paid search results, emails, instant messaging and "we" media. The interim measures require online:
  • Advertisers and advertising agents to register with the local AIC.
  • Advertising providers to verify the authenticity of promotional content.
  • Promotional content to be immediately identifiable as advertisements.
  • Advertising providers to provide and prominently display opt out and other user choice functionality.
  • Soft advertisers (that is, celebrity promoters) to disclose the receipt of related compensation.
The interim measures also prohibit online advertising providers from engaging in unfair competition in the form of filtering, blocking or otherwise tampering with the advertisements of competitors.

Market reaction

Paul McKenzie, Partner, Morrison & Foerster, Beijing

"The coming into effect next month of the new Advertising Law together with the interim measures (if enacted on schedule) will significantly strengthen the SAIC's hand in seeking to regulate as advertising various types of commercial messaging online and through emails and short messaging and in requiring market players to meet the new requirements."

Action items

GC for companies that provide or sponsor (or act as intermediaries in relation to) online promotional content should examine current advertising content and services to ensure compliance with the draft rules (and more generally with the amended Advertising Law, which also takes effect on 1 September).

CBRC issues implementing rules for regulations on foreign-invested banks

On 1 July 2015, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) issued the Implementing Rules for the Administrative Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Foreign-invested Banks, which take effect from 1 September 2015. The implementing rules complement two other major pieces of legislation governing the regulation of foreign-invested banks and replace rules of the same name issued in 2006. The implementing rules:
  • Eliminate the requirement for a foreign bank to establish a representative office before forming a foreign-invested bank.
  • Relax the requirements for foreign-invested banks to carry out RMB business.
  • Clarify the qualifications requirements for senior management personnel of foreign-invested banks.
  • Allow foreign-invested banks to file for protection under China's bankruptcy rules.
  • Reduce the number of regulatory approvals required for foreign-invested banks.
  • Remove provisions related to licensing procedures that are now incorporated in other rules.

Market reaction

Shirley Wang, Partner, Zhong Lun Law Firm, Beijing

"The implementing rules emphasise that, on the basis of strengthening effective supervision and regulation, foreign banks' access to the PRC market and their need to conduct RMB currency business will be duly eased. The rules embody the government's further opening up of China's banking industry under the ongoing policy to comprehensively deepen the reforms."

Action items

GC for foreign commercial banks should become familiar with the implementing rules as well as related legislation regulating foreign-investing banks, to ensure compliance and to take full advantage of any new opportunities.

SPC clarifies jurisdiction rules on CIETAC and former CIETAC sub-commissions

On 15 July 2015, the Supreme People's Court issued the Reply on the Instruction Request by the Shanghai High People’s Court and Others for Issues Concerning the Cases of Judicial Review of the Arbitral Awards Rendered by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, Former Sub-Commissions Thereof and Other Arbitration Institutions. The reply instructs China's courts on how to handle jurisdictional disputes arising out of the CIETAC split. Under the reply, where the parties have agreed to submit their disputes to the CIETAC Shanghai sub-commission or the CIETAC South China sub-commission:
  • The relevant former CIETAC sub-commission has jurisdiction if the clause was concluded before such former sub-commission renamed itself.
  • CIETAC has jurisdiction if the clause was concluded on or after the former sub-commission renamed itself but before 17 July 2015 (the effective date of the reply), unless the claimant seeks recourse with the former CIETAC sub-commission and the respondent fails to object.
  • CIETAC has jurisdiction if the clause was concluded on or after 17 July 2015.

Market reaction

Timothy Blakely, Partner, Morrison & Foerster, Hong Kong

"The reply resolves lingering uncertainties and provides welcome clarification of key jurisdictional issues arising from the CIETAC split. By providing a clear roadmap for these issues, the reply should help put the jurisdictional unpredictability caused by the split in the rearview mirror, and should restore confidence in Shenzhen and Shanghai as seats of arbitration."

Action items

GC should understand the implications of the SPC reply and ensure that any arbitration clause within their company's contracts clearly specifies the exact official name of their chosen arbitration forum to avoid enforcement uncertainty in the People's Courts. GC may also wish to review legacy contracts and consider negotiating a variation where the identity of the arbitration forum may be considered as ambiguous under the reply.

State council recirculates draft project approval rules for public comment

On 23 July 2015, the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council circulated an amended version of the Regulations on the Administration of Investment Projects Subject to Government Verification and Approval and Investment Projects Subject to Government Record-filing (Draft), which was initially published by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) on 12 June 2015. The draft rules apply to the administration of project approvals for Chinese outbound investment projects and onshore fixed asset investment projects.
This round of amendments:
  • Closes a loophole under which government agencies could have delayed project approval indefinitely by neither informing an applicant of deficiencies in its application nor accepting the application for review (Article 24).
  • Exempts insubstantial changes in construction project location from triggering a second round of approvals, where verification and approval is generally required (Article 36(1)).
For a general overview of the changes in the 2015 draft, see Article, GC Agenda China: June 2015: NDRC circulates new draft rules on project approval.
For guidance on the project approval process in force as of August 2015, see Practice note: Establishing a China business: project approval.

Market reaction

Robert Lewis, Senior Counsel, Zhong Lun Law Firm, Beijing

"This amended version of the draft NDRC project approval rules includes only a few tweaks to the original draft, but these revisions help underscore that fact that the State Council appears to be serious about moving its administrative departments away from their traditional approval role and allowing enterprises more autonomy in relation to investment decisions for both domestic fixed asset and outbound investment projects. The newly added provision on deemed acceptance of the application in the absence of a timely response is particularly helpful to speed up the verification process and to ensure more predictability overall."

Action items

GC for companies that operate in sectors involving the construction, operation or transfer of fixed assets should become familiar with the draft rules when it is published. GC for other companies may wish to consider whether any component of their business involves fixed assets and investigate whether project approval or record filing is required.

Copyright Protection Center introduces identity verification for software copyright registration

On 24 July 2015, the Copyright Protection Center of China issued the Notice on Further Standardizing the Processing of Software Registration Applications, which took effect from 17 August 2015. Under the notice, individuals filing applications to register software copyrights on behalf of third parties must verify their identity when submitting the application. Where an individual or corporate applicant designates a contact person as its representative for filing the application, the contact person must be identified in the application form. Likewise, when an applicant files through an IP agency, the agency and its contact person must be identified in the application form. In each case, the contact person must personally submit the application and provide a photocopy of his identification card (or other recognised form of identification, such as a passport or military ID).

Market reaction

Scott Palmer, Partner, Sheppard Mullin, Beijing

"While not revolutionary, this development is important nevertheless. It addresses the problem of bogus or dubious software registrations, makes the registration process more transparent, and thus enhances the efficiency and integrity of the registration process in general."

Action items

GC for companies that choose to register software copyright in China should become familiar with the documentary and procedural requirements of the Copyright Protection Center of China to ensure their registration applications are accepted and processed in a timely manner.

MOFCOM allows finance leasing companies to conduct commercial factoring

On 27 July 2015 the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) issued the Notice on Popularising the Replicable Pilot Reform Experiences of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone on the Finance Leasing Industry (关于融资租赁行业推广中国(上海)自由贸易试验区可复制改革试点经验的通知). Under the notice, MOFCOM has extended nationwide a policy that finance leasing companies may engage in commercial factoring activities (that is, buy and sell accounts receivable such as book debts at a discount to face value) related to their core financing business.
MOFCOM has also exempted the subsidiaries of finance leasing companies (that is, special purpose vehicles set up to hold the leased assets) from the minimum capitalisation requirements that apply to finance leasing companies. In 2013, the State Council abolished minimum registered capitalisation requirements generally as part of a series of reforms to China's company law. However, capitalisation requirements imposed under other industry legislation, including that relating to the finance leasing industry, remain in force (see Practice note, Understanding the 2013 Company Law reforms: China: Company capitalisation: where old system will continue to exist).

Market reaction

Harvey Lau, Partner, Baker & McKenzie, Shanghai

"Commercial factoring and leasing industries have always been closely connected. Allowing financial leasing companies to engage in commercial factoring nationwide not only provides them with more business opportunities it also provides them with another fund raising tool and more options when they design their operational and business structures."

Action items

GC for companies that engage in financial leasing should examine potential structuring and accounting advantages that result from the notice.

NPC updates five-year legislative plan

On 3 August 2015, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC Standing Committee) amended the legislative plan for the 2013 to 2018 legislative session, which was originally published in October 2013. The adjusted plan increases the number of bills to be considered by legislators from 68 to 102. Of these 102 bills, 76 are scheduled for discussion within the 2013 to 2018 session and another 26 are set to be drafted and submitted for discussion subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions.
The 34 bills added to the plan include a number which have been classified as high priority (that is, are scheduled to be passed before the end of 2017). These high priority laws include the Property Tax Law, Continental Boundary Law, the Energy Law, the Environmental Protection Tax Law and a codification of China's Civil Law. Domestic commentary has focused on the introduction of the Property Tax Law, which has been anticipated for a number of years and has the potential to affect China's real estate market.
For further coverage of this development, see Legal update, NPC updates five-year legislative plan.
For more information about the legislative process in China, see Practice Note, Understanding Chinese legislation: Legislative planning process.

Market reaction

Robert Lewis

"The aggressive schedule under the amended legislative plan is widely seen as evidence that greater emphasis is being placed on the rule of law in commercial matters generally. In particular, the Property Tax Law is expected to bring more stability and predictability to the housing market in China."

Action items

GC may wish to become familiar with the scope of new and amended laws to be considered under the legislative plan and work with their government affairs colleagues, chambers of commerce and industry associations to see what influence can be exercised on the drafting of this legislation.

SPC upholds non-bank private lending

On 6 August 2015, the SPC issued the Provisions on Certain Issues concerning Application of Law in Trial of Cases involving Private Lending, a judicial interpretation which will take effect from 1 September 2015.
The provisions confirm the validity of onshore private lending activities by individuals and non-bank companies (that is, companies whose business scope does not include lending activities) that arise in the usual course of business. Previously, the court only recognised the validity of loans made by banking institutions approved by the China Banking Regulatory Commission. The provisions also regulate the interest rates applicable to such loans, impose default interest rates in certain situations, and limit the liability of P2P lending platforms where the platform operator acts only as an intermediary to facilitate crowd-funding activities.
For further coverage of this development, see Legal update, SPC upholds non-bank private lending.

Market reaction

Shirley Wang

"The provisions are significant in that they recognise for the first time that private lending is permitted under law, whereas before this was an area of substantial uncertainty and risk. The usury rules in the provisions also provide a legal safe harbour for interest rates below 24% per annum on such private loans (higher in some cases), which gives legitimate private lenders more than adequate flexibility in this regard while still protecting private borrowers against loan shark-type interest rates."

Action items

GC may wish to work with their finance departments to determine if the ability to conduct direct intra-group financing (that is, without a commercial bank intermediary) in accordance with the provisions would offer significant benefits to their companies.

SAIC pushes through company registration reform on "three in one" business licence

On 7 August 2015 SAIC, together with five other government agencies, jointly issued the Notice on the Implementation of the State Council Opinions on Accelerating the Registration System Reform on "Combining the Three Certificates" (关于贯彻落实《国务院办公厅关于加快推进“三证合一”登记制度改革的意见》的通知). The notice directs local AICs to issue combined business licences, that is business licences that also function as a company's organisation code certificate and tax registration certificate and carry a uniform identification number (called the social credit code) from 1 October 2015. Before this date, the business licence, organisation code certificate and tax registration certificate, as well as any related amendments, will continue to be issued by three separate bureaux within each jurisdiction. The new combined business licences will be published on the SAIC's company information disclosure system.
Since 2013, the State Council has been carrying out company law reforms with the aim of making the business registration system more efficient for investors. The combined certificate move forms part of this reform process. For more information on the implications of the 2013 Company Law reforms (including the company information disclosure system), see Practice note, Understanding the 2013 Company Law reforms: China.

Market reaction

Robert Lewis

"The simplified registration process for entities is expected to reduce the average time spent procuring the business licence, organisation code certificate and tax registration certificate from approximately one month to as little as three days. This is a significant step forward in the government's continuing efforts to streamline the overall entity registration process."

Action items

GC should become familiar with the new combined business licence and its effect on company registration (and registration amendment) requirements.