FTC Proposes Settlement with Spokeo for FCRA and FTC Act Violations | Practical Law

FTC Proposes Settlement with Spokeo for FCRA and FTC Act Violations | Practical Law

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced a proposed settlement with Spokeo, Inc., a data brokerage company that compiles and sells detailed consumer information, over charges that it violated the Fair Credit and Reporting Act (FCRA) and the FTC Act. This is the first FTC case to address the sale of online data, including data from social media, in the context of employee screening. 

FTC Proposes Settlement with Spokeo for FCRA and FTC Act Violations

Practical Law Legal Update 1-519-8811 (Approx. 4 pages)

FTC Proposes Settlement with Spokeo for FCRA and FTC Act Violations

by PLC Intellectual Property & Technology
Published on 14 Jun 2012USA (National/Federal)
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced a proposed settlement with Spokeo, Inc., a data brokerage company that compiles and sells detailed consumer information, over charges that it violated the Fair Credit and Reporting Act (FCRA) and the FTC Act. This is the first FTC case to address the sale of online data, including data from social media, in the context of employee screening.
On June 12, 2012, the FTC announced in a press release its agreement with Spokeo, Inc. (Spokeo) to settle charges that Spokeo violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the FTC Act.

Background

Spokeo is a data broker that compiles and sells access to consumer's personal information. It collects this information from offline and online resources, including social media, to create a detailed personal profile. The profile may include an individual's name, address, age range and e-mail address. It may also include hobbies, ethnicity, religion, participation on social media sites and photos.
The FTC alleged that from 2008 until 2010 Spokeo marketed these profiles as an employment screening tool for human resources professionals, job recruiters and others, and sold access on a subscription basis. It also ran online advertisements specifically to attract these parties, and created a special portion of the Spokeo website for recruiters.
In 2010, Spokeo amended the Terms of Service on its website to state that it is not a consumer reporting agency and that its services could not be used for FCRA-covered purposes. However, the FTC alleged that the company failed to revoke access to existing users, including subscribers who may have joined Spokeo through its website for recruiters, or ensure those who had previously purchased access did not use its website or information for FCRA-covered purposes.
The FTC also alleged that Spokeo directed its employees to post comments endorsing the company to news and technology websites under account names that were created by the company to give the impression that they were independent, ordinary consumers.

Allegations

In its complaint, the FTC found that Spokeo qualified as a "consumer reporting agency" under the FCRA because it provided "consumer reports." Under the statute, a consumer report bears on a "consumer's character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living and/or other attributes listed in section 603(d), and is "used or expected to be used . . . in whole or in part" as a factor in determining the consumer's eligibility for employment or other purposes specified in section 604 of the FCRA.
The FTC alleged that Spokeo failed to adhere to three key FCRA requirements:
  • Maintaining reasonable procedures to verify who its users are and that the consumer report information would be used for a permissible purpose.
  • Ensuring the accuracy of its consumer reports.
  • Providing a "User Notice" to any person who purchased its consumer reports specifying that party's legal obligations.
The FTC also separately alleged that Spokeo committed deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act through its deceptive endorsement practices.

Terms of Settlement

Under the terms of the proposed settlement, Spokeo:
  • Will pay $800,000 to the FTC.
  • Is barred from future violations of the FCRA.
  • Is barred from making misrepresentations about its endorsements or failing to disclose a material connection with endorsers.
The proposed order is subject to court approval.

Practical Implications

This case is noteworthy as it is the first FTC case enforcing the FCRA to address the sale of online data, including social media data, in the context of employee screening. It also demonstrates the FTC will enforce the FCRA against a company whose practice is to collect and sell consumer data in a manner prohibited under the FCRA, even where a company does not purport to operate as a consumer reporting agency.