Epstein Becker: Lack of Actual Evidence in California Trade Secret Misappropriation Case Merits Attorneys’ Fees Award | Practical Law

Epstein Becker: Lack of Actual Evidence in California Trade Secret Misappropriation Case Merits Attorneys’ Fees Award | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. discusses SASCO v. Rosendin Electric, Inc., in which the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, affirmed the trial court's order awarding attorneys' fees to the defendants after concluding the plaintiff engaged in bad faith. The trial court found that there was no evidence of misappropriation of trade secrets and the plaintiff's continued prosecution without evidence of actual misappropriation constituted subjective bad faith. 

Epstein Becker: Lack of Actual Evidence in California Trade Secret Misappropriation Case Merits Attorneys’ Fees Award

by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Published on 19 Jul 2012California, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. discusses SASCO v. Rosendin Electric, Inc., in which the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, affirmed the trial court's order awarding attorneys' fees to the defendants after concluding the plaintiff engaged in bad faith. The trial court found that there was no evidence of misappropriation of trade secrets and the plaintiff's continued prosecution without evidence of actual misappropriation constituted subjective bad faith.