Executive pay and the "two strikes rule": is board stability at risk in Australia? | Practical Law

Executive pay and the "two strikes rule": is board stability at risk in Australia? | Practical Law

In Australia, if 25% of the shareholders of a listed company (excluding directors and key executives) who vote on the company's remuneration report object to the report for two years running, the entire board may face re-election. This "two strikes rule" shifts the traditional division of responsibility for management between directors and shareholders and has stirred up heated debate among relevant stakeholders. This article looks at the history and effects of the rule.

Executive pay and the "two strikes rule": is board stability at risk in Australia?

Practical Law UK Articles 1-522-8733 (Approx. 12 pages)

Executive pay and the "two strikes rule": is board stability at risk in Australia?

by Teresa Handicott, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Law stated as at 01 Feb 2013Australia
In Australia, if 25% of the shareholders of a listed company (excluding directors and key executives) who vote on the company's remuneration report object to the report for two years running, the entire board may face re-election. This "two strikes rule" shifts the traditional division of responsibility for management between directors and shareholders and has stirred up heated debate among relevant stakeholders. This article looks at the history and effects of the rule.
This article is part of the PLC multi-jurisdictional guide to corporate governance law. For a full list of contents visit www.practicallaw.com/corpgov-mjg.