Drafting a Private Company Equity Incentive Plan | Practical Law

Drafting a Private Company Equity Incentive Plan | Practical Law

A discussion of certain issues that a private company should consider when drafting a new equity incentive plan, including certain liquidity and shareholder agreement considerations.  

Drafting a Private Company Equity Incentive Plan

Practical Law Legal Update 1-523-5781 (Approx. 5 pages)

Drafting a Private Company Equity Incentive Plan

by PLC Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Published on 29 Jan 2013USA (National/Federal)
A discussion of certain issues that a private company should consider when drafting a new equity incentive plan, including certain liquidity and shareholder agreement considerations.
Equity compensation is often a significant component of the total compensation paid to employees and other service providers. While some provisions of private company equity plans mirror the provisions in public company plans, in the private company context, equity compensation raises special concerns. Existing shareholders want to retain control over management and seek protections against outside parties. Private companies therefore generally place transfer restrictions on company shares and may require employees to sell their shares back to the company in certain circumstances (for example, termination of employment).
Because private company stock is generally illiquid, employees often have concerns regarding how they will ultimately realize any gain as a shareholder and may seek assurance from the company that it will repurchase their shares if their employment is terminated or if a liquidity event does not occur within a certain period of time. Special provisions addressing these and other issues may be included in a shareholders' agreement or each individual's award agreement.
When drafting an equity incentive plan, private companies should consider several issues, including:
  • The types of awards that will be available for issuance under the plan.
  • The appropriate share reserve.
  • The appropriate vesting schedule for awards granted under the plan.
  • The methods participants can use to pay the exercise price of stock options.
  • The permissible methods for satisfying tax withholding obligations.
  • The definition of change in control to be included in the plan and what will happen to outstanding awards on a change in control.
  • The types of restrictions that will be placed on the transfer of shares.
  • How (and where) liquidity considerations will be addressed.
  • Whether the plan will contemplate clawbacks and forfeitures.
  • For companies considering an initial public offering (IPO), whether a public company styled plan should be adopted.
The following are select portions from Practice Note, Drafting an Equity Incentive Plan for a Private Company. See the full Practice Note for more helpful guidance.

Share Reserve

Because an equity plan will likely be used for several years, the company should estimate the number of shares that will be needed to cover future grants. Private companies typically have only one or a small number of controlling shareholders and therefore can obtain the necessary shareholder approval to amend the plan to increase the share reserve at any time. Nevertheless, most private companies typically reserve enough shares for three years' worth of grants for administrative convenience (for example, to minimize the number of regulatory filings that may be required by any applicable Blue Sky laws when the plan is amended to increase the share reserve).

Additional Share and Annual Award Limitations

In addition to an overall share reserve, to comply with IRC Section 422, specific provisions should be included in the plan that set out the maximum number of shares that can be granted as incentive stock options (which may be the same number as the total number of shares reserved under the plan).

Vesting

Private companies rarely provide for a default or minimum vesting schedule in their equity plans. Rather, companies include provisions in their plans that contemplate vesting but provide flexibility for the plan administrator to set vesting schedules in individual award agreements when grants are made.
Most plans give the plan administrator authority to accelerate the vesting of awards in connection with certain events such as a change in control.
While private companies do grant awards that vest over time based on the provision of services to the company or on the achievement of performance goals such as EBITDA vesting targets, private companies that are owned by private equity funds often also grant awards that vest only when a liquidity event occurs (generally a change in control or IPO of the company) where the portion of the award that will vest when the liquidity event occurs is determined based on the return in investment realized by the private equity sponsor through the date of the liquidity event. For example, a plan may provide that 33% of the award vests if the internal rate of return (IRR) realized equals 25% and 100% of the award vests if the IRR equals or exceeds 30%, with the percentage that vests if the IRR exceeds 25% but is less than 30% determined by linear interpolation between 33% and 100%.

Liquidity and Shareholder Agreement Considerations

A private company will generally want to place restrictions on the transfer of fully vested shares, and also provide for certain rights that would make it easier for majority shareholders to sell the company. These rights are typically contained in either an individual shareholder's agreement or a shareholders' agreement that all individuals must become a party to when they acquire shares. Alternatively, the relevant provisions can be built into the applicable award agreement for each participant. Below is a brief summary of the provisions typically set forth in a shareholders' agreement that are most relevant to holders of equity awards.

Restrictions on Transferability

A shareholders' agreement typically provides that even vested shares are not transferable until an IPO occurs (some shareholders' agreements provide for the termination of transfer restrictions on a change in control, while others provide that the transfer restrictions continue for a period of one to two years after an IPO).

Liquidity Considerations

The company should consider the ability to redeem equity through the use of call rights for the company once the service relationship has ended. In addition, executives should consider whether to negotiate for, and the company should consider whether to grant, put rights.

Call Rights

Shareholders' agreements typically give the company the right to repurchase shares for a specified period after a service provider's termination of service (referred to as a call right). The purchase price generally depends on the circumstances surrounding the service provider's termination of service, as follows:
  • If a service provider is a "good leaver" (that is, terminated by the company without cause, resigns for good reason, or is terminated due to death or disability), the purchase price will generally be the then-current per share fair market value.
  • If a service provider is a "bad leaver" (that is, terminated by the company for cause or resigns without good reason or has materially violated a noncompete or other applicable restrictive covenant after a "good leaver" termination), some companies provide that the repurchase price will be the lower of cost or the then-current fair market value. Service providers who exercise options that are subject to a call right where the repurchase price is potentially below fair market value should consider making a Section 83(b) election on the exercise of options to avoid the imposition of ordinary income tax on any appreciation in the value of shares between the date of exercise and the date on which the "substantial risk of forfeiture" represented by the below fair market value call right lapses.
A repurchase at a price that is greater than fair market value may result in liability accounting and may be a violation of Section 409A. To avoid having an equity award subject to a call right (or put right) attract liability accounting, the shareholders' agreement must provide that the repurchase cannot take place before the 181st day from the latest of:
  • The date of termination of employment.
  • In the case of an option or SAR, the date the shares were issued following exercise.
  • In the case of other equity awards, the date the awards became vested.

Put Rights

Senior executives of private companies are sometimes able to negotiate a put right, which:
  • Gives the holder the right to sell a certain quantity of his outstanding shares back to the company at a specified price for a specified period after a termination of the executive's employment (for example, seven months after the termination date). The price is generally fair market value at the time the repurchase occurs. A repurchase at a price that is greater than fair market value may result in liability accounting and may be a violation of Section 409A.
  • Is typically provided only after a "good leaver" termination (and is often restricted to termination due to death or disability).
  • Would not customarily be given to an executive who is a "bad leaver."
  • Is subject to the same potential accounting and Section 409A considerations as are described above for call rights.
Executives may also try to negotiate for a right to put some portion of their equity back to the company while they are still employed if there has not been a liquidity event by a certain time (for example, five years after the incumbent private equity sponsor acquired the company). An in-service put right is rarely granted by private companies. Put rights in general are a contentious issue as they give the holder the right to receive liquidity for their equity before other equity holders (including the majority equity holders).

Other Shareholders' Agreement Considerations

In addition, shareholders' agreements typically include provisions granting the following rights:
  • Drag Along Right. This gives the majority shareholder the right to force minority shareholders (in this case, the participant in the plan) to join, on a pro rata basis, in a sale of the company at the same price, terms and conditions that the majority shareholder receives. Drag along rights are important for the majority shareholder to be able to deliver 100% of the company on a sale without any dissenting majority shareholders.
  • Tag Along/Co-sale Right. This gives the minority shareholder participant the right to sell the same portion of his shares, at the same price and on the same terms and conditions that the majority shareholder receives, when the majority shareholder sells all or a portion of its shares.
  • Right of First Refusal. This gives the company the right to purchase any shares held by the participant before a sale of the shares to a third party, at the same price and on the same terms and conditions as were offered to the third party purchaser. The participant may only sell to the third party if the company declines to purchase the shares. A participant's rights to sell to a third party always remain subject to the other provisions of the shareholders' agreement (including any then applicable transfer restrictions).

Clawbacks and Forfeitures

Although private companies are not subject to the clawback requirements of either the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, they should consider including a broad provision in the plan authorizing the company to recover gains on equity awards if it was determined that the gains resulted from:
  • A restatement of financial results.
  • Fraud.
  • Other participant misconduct.
Similarly, a company may wish to include a provision in the plan that causes an employee to forfeit equity awards (including vested awards) in the event of a termination for cause. Without a specific forfeiture provision in the plan or award agreement, courts may be reluctant to enforce this action at a later date.
For more information on drafting a private company equity incentive plan, see Practice Note, Drafting an Equity Incentive Plan for a Private Company. This Practice Note was contributed by Tristan Brown and Jennifer M. Wolff, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, with PLC Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation.