Private equity in Singapore: market and regulatory overview
A Q&A guide to private equity law in Singapore.
The Q&A gives a high level overview of the key practical issues including the level of activity and recent trends in the market; investment incentives for institutional and private investors; the mechanics involved in establishing a private equity fund; equity and debt finance issues in a private equity transaction; issues surrounding buyouts and the relationship between the portfolio company's managers and the private equity funds; management incentives; and exit routes from investments. Details on national private equity and venture capital associations are also included.
To compare answers across multiple jurisdictions visit the Private Equity Country Q&A Tool.
This Q&A is part of the global guide to private equity. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit www.practicallaw.com/privateequity-guide.
The main sources of Asian-based investment are:
Banks or investment banks.
Other common means of obtaining funding include:
Private equity "fund of funds" managers.
Sovereign wealth funds.
Although Southeast Asia remained one of the few growth hotspots in 2015, the year was characterised by investors taking a more conservative approach to emerging markets with the acknowledgment that the region has a number of diverse markets and variable local conditions. In a survey carried out by Preqin in 2015, only 27% of Asian PE investors surveyed made new commitments in 2015, compared with 55% in the preceding year.
Despite this, private equity investment in the technology sector continues on a high, with investors favouring funds with strong sector and geographical advantages. A number of technology funds were established in 2015 in Southeast Asia, particularly in Singapore, where the fund management industry is more mature. Many funds are looking to make a name for themselves in this sector and to take advantage of the high growth expected over the next few years.
In addition, with the continued downward spiral of commodity prices, interesting opportunities have arisen in the oil and gas sector (together with ancillary services) and a number of other sectors that benefit from low oil prices. The industrial production sector and consumer sector also top the list of attractive target sectors, particularly with a fast-growing middle class in the region.
Competition among investors for key assets remains high, with the ability to source off-market opportunities and create value being key differentiators. According to a Preqin report from September 2015, PE firms based in Asia have estimated dry powder (marketable securities that are highly liquid or cash reserves) of US$140 billion, a new high for the region that brings with it the risk of over-valuation of desirable assets.
Distributions from private equity funds in Asia, which in the past have been lacklustre compared to those in developed markets, are also expected to rise as the industry matures with a deepening talent pool across Asia. Investors continue to be wary of regional market volatility and political and regulatory uncertainties, although these concerns are largely avoided in pure Singapore transactions.
The growing middle class across Southeast Asia, combined with pressures on commodity prices, has led to an increased focus on the consumer sector. Technology and media play an important part in Singapore, with high demand for mobile technology requiring increased investment in all aspects of these sectors. Increasing demand in the education, healthcare and logistics industries also presents opportunities in the wider Southeast Asia region.
Synthetic fund structures
Secondary funds are increasingly using synthetic fund structures to gain economic exposure to existing asset portfolios. This approach reduces the need to transfer the underlying legal title and allows transactions to be effected much more quickly.
Co-sponsorship transactions (a form of "shadow capital", where an institutional investor and a private equity fund are equal partners) are also on the rise, representing a more active form of investing. Shadow capital arrangements are increasingly displacing private equity syndicates that were historically formed to accommodate larger investments.
Singapore as a jurisdiction for registration
Fund vehicles are increasingly being registered in Singapore, enabling closer proximity to their portfolio companies. Singapore is perceived as a springboard into the other Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, which increases its attractiveness as a base.
There has been a marked increase in the value of funds raised, together with an increase in deal value over the past few years.
The level of private equity investment in Singapore has developed steadily over recent years, as Singapore continues to function as a reliable hub for Southeast Asian deals. Investment in the digital/tech market in Singapore is at a high, as it has been over the past two years, with the advantages of committed infrastructure investment from the government and the promise of access to the ASEAN region. Real estate is another sector that has seen healthy investment by funds.
While the value of PE investment remained stable year-on-year, deal volume was up in 2015 compared to 2014. Transactions were clustered in the technology and consumer sectors, with a focus on small-to-mid-market companies with bases in Singapore and Indonesia. For example:
In July 2015, Singapore-based GrabTaxi raised over US$200 million in new capital led by US hedge fund Coatue Management LLC.
In March 2015, Singapore-headquartered PE firm KV Asia invested into Aalst Chocolate with the aim of expanding the company's offering into new Asian markets.
According to a 2015 report by Ernst & Young, a number of private equity houses are retaining their investments for longer than anticipated to try to reach their targeted multiple. Because of these longer holding periods, and the record amount of dry powder, the volume of secondary buy-outs in Southeast Asia is expected to increase.
Amendments to the Singapore Companies Act
The Singapore Companies Act (Chapter 50) was recently amended, with the last of the amendments coming into force on 3 January 2016. The following changes are of particular interest to PE houses:
The prohibition on giving financial assistance no longer applies to private companies, reflecting the changes made to the UK Companies Act in 2006. This will mean greater flexibility and will simplify many corporate transactions, such as group re-organisations and leveraged buy-outs. Accordingly, the "whitewash" procedure is now redundant, which will save time and costs and allow for simpler transaction structuring.
SME portfolio companies stand to benefit from broader exemptions from statutory audit (effective 1 July 2015), reducing the regulatory burden in a move towards a more risk-based approach.
The following schemes run until 31 March 2019:
Offshore Fund Incentive Scheme.
Resident Fund Incentive Scheme.
Enhanced-Tier Fund Incentive Scheme.
Enhancements to the Enhanced-Tier Fund Incentive Scheme were announced in the 2015 Budget. From 1 April 2015, the Enhanced-Tier Fund Incentive Scheme applies to special purpose vehicles (SPVs) held by master-feeder fund structures. Master and feeder funds and SPVs within a master-feeder fund structure can apply for the Enhanced-Tier Fund Incentive Scheme and can meet certain economic conditions on a collective basis.
In the 2015 Budget, it was announced that a 5% concessionary tax rate will be given to approved venture capital fund management companies on their specified income. The approval window will be from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2020. The Pioneer Service incentive for venture capital fund management companies was withdrawn on 1 April 2015. A review date of 31 March 2020 will be legislated for the tax exemption scheme under section 13H of the Income Tax Act (Chapter 134) for approved venture capital funds.
Goods and services tax
The existing goods and services tax (GST) concession that allows qualifying funds that are managed by prescribed fund managers in Singapore to claim input GST incurred on prescribed expenses will run until 31 March 2019.
In 2015, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) published the Second Edition of the e-Tax Guide "GST: Guide for the Fund Management Industry", covering revisions to the GST treatment of services provided or received by fund managers in the fund management industry.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)
On 18 March 2015, the following came into force:
The Singapore-US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Model 1 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA).
The Income Tax (International Tax Compliance Agreements) (United States of America) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations).
Under the IGA and the Regulations, reporting Singaporean financial institutions (RSFIs) must fulfil their reporting obligations arising under FATCA through the IRAS instead of reporting directly to the US Internal Revenue Service (US IRS). The information reported to the IRAS is in turn shared with the US IRS. Non-reporting Singapore-based financial institutions (NRSFIs) are generally not required to report such information to the IRAS.
RSFIs must register themselves with the US IRS to avoid FATCA-related withholding tax. NRSFIs can also be subject to US IRS registration requirements.
Tax incentive schemes
There are no tax incentives or other schemes specifically aimed at encouraging investment in unlisted companies. However, the income tax system is designed to encourage private equity investment activities.
The GST concession for qualifying funds managed by prescribed fund managers in Singapore will last until 2019 (see Question 4).
Single-tier corporate tax system
Corporate income tax paid by a resident company is final and there is no further tax on dividends.
Non-taxation of gains on disposal of equity investments
There is no capital gains tax. Provided that a company has held at least 20% of the ordinary shares in the target for a continuous period of 24 months immediately before disposal of the shares, the gains realised on the sale of its shares in that company are exempt from income tax, if certain conditions are met. Currently, this tax treatment applies to disposals of ordinary shares made during the period 1 June 2012 to 31 May 2017 inclusive.
Financial sector incentive scheme (FSI Scheme)
The FSI-Fund Management (FSI-FM) Award under the FSI Scheme (regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)) has been extended to 31 December 2018. The FSI-FM Award provides for a 10% concessionary income tax rate for qualifying income derived by an approved fund management company that was granted an FSI-FM Award. New applicants for the FSI-FM Award are subject to MAS requirements.
Offshore fund incentive scheme
A foreign investment fund vehicle (an individual, company or trustee) can automatically qualify for tax exemption on specified income derived from designated investments if key conditions are met, including:
The income arises from funds being managed by a Singapore fund management company holding a capital markets services (CMS) licence for fund management under the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289) (SFA) or that is exempted from holding such a licence.
The fund is not wholly beneficially owned by Singaporeans.
A financial penalty may be payable to the Comptroller of Income Tax by an investor in the fund if he is not a qualifying investor. A qualifying investor is:
An individual investor.
A bona fide non-resident and non-individual investor that does not have a permanent establishment or carry on a business in Singapore, or that carries out operations in Singapore through a permanent establishment but does not use funds from these operations to invest in the fund.
A designated person.
An investor that (either alone or together with its associates) does not beneficially own more than 30% of the value of the fund (where the fund has fewer than ten investors) or more than 50% of the value of the fund (where the fund has ten or more investors).
Resident fund incentive scheme
The MAS can approve an application by a Singapore-incorporated resident fund for tax exemption on specified income derived from designated investments, provided that the conditions listed under the Offshore Fund Incentive Scheme are met. The fund must also comply with conditions imposed by the MAS, including the following:
Its investment strategy must remain the same from the approval date.
It must use a Singapore-based fund administrator.
It must incur at least SG$200,000 of expenses in each financial year.
A financial penalty is payable to the Comptroller of Income Tax by an investor in the fund who (either alone or together with its associates) beneficially owns either more than:
30% of the value of the fund (where the fund has fewer than ten investors).
50% of the value of the fund (where the fund has ten or more investors).
Enhanced-tier fund incentive scheme
There are no restrictions on investors under the Enhanced-Tier Fund Incentive Scheme and other types of fund vehicles are allowed to be used, such as limited partnerships (LPs). Fund vehicles that have been approved by the MAS enjoy a tax exemption on specified income from designated investments. A fund must meet conditions imposed by the MAS, including:
A minimum fund size of SG$50 million (committed capital for private equity funds).
Managed or advised by a fund management company holding a CMS licence or that is exempted from holding such a licence.
Singapore-based fund administrator if the fund is a Singapore-incorporated resident company with its tax residency in Singapore.
At least three investment professionals in fund management roles, each earning more than SG$3,500 per month.
At least SG$200,000 local business spending in each basis period.
Investment strategy remaining unchanged from the date approval is given.
Not enjoying other tax incentive schemes.
Master and feeder funds and SPVs within a master-feeder fund structure can apply for this scheme and meet the economic conditions on a collective basis.
Cayman Islands exempted LPs have historically been the preferred legal structure for private equity funds managed in Singapore. Singapore has its own Limited Partnerships Act (Chapter 163B), which governs the establishment of Singapore LPs, but familiarity with the Cayman structure has meant private equity funds have used the Cayman legal structure, even though both are modelled on Delaware law.
It is fairly common for a master-feeder structure to be put in place, under which a Cayman LP acts as the pooling vehicle that owns a Singapore-incorporated master fund. This trend is generally because of Singapore's network of double taxation treaties. Companies incorporated in Singapore can benefit from employing a master-feeder structure that allows a fund to enjoy the flexibility of an LP and the tax efficiencies of a Singapore master fund.
Certain private equity funds can be structured as stand-alone companies incorporated either under:
Cayman's Exempted Limited Partnership Law (2001 revision).
Singapore's Limited Partnerships Act (Chapter 163B).
Limited partnerships (LPs)
LPs are tax transparent for the purpose of taxation on income.
Companies are subject to tax on income either:
Accruing in, or derived from, Singapore.
Foreign and received (or deemed to have been received) in Singapore (unless exempted under a tax incentive scheme or foreign-sourced income exemption scheme).
Fund duration and investment objectives
The average life of a private equity fund is typically between five and ten years, although this can change depending on the performance of the assets and what exit opportunities arise.
Investors may not have to inject their committed capital all at once. A fund can draw down commitments over a certain period, typically ranging from two to five years. A fund can also build in a right to make additional capital calls.
Fund regulation and licensing
Fund management is a regulated activity for which a capital markets services licence is required under the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289). Companies carrying out fund management activities must be Licensed Fund Management Companies, unless one of the available exemptions applies and is approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
Registered fund management company (RFMC) exemption
An RFMC must:
Only provide fund management services to qualified investors.
Have a minimum base capital of SG$250,000.
Serve no more than 30 investors (up to 15 can be funds, including feeder funds).
Not have total assets under management exceeding SG$250 million.
Immovable assets (real estate and infrastructure) exemption
A company does not need to be registered with, or licensed by, the MAS if:
It manages a fund that invests solely in immovable assets or in securities issued by investment holding companies whose sole purpose is to invest into real estate development projects or real estate properties.
Where the fund is offered only to accredited or institutional investors.
A qualified investor can be either:
Accredited investors, that are either:
individuals whose net personal assets exceed SG$2 million, or whose income in the preceding 12 months is not less than SG$300,000; or
corporations with net assets exceeding SG$10 million.
Institutional investors, that are either:
Singapore-licensed banks and other financial institutions; or
governmental authorities and statutory boards in Singapore.
A fund, where the fund's units are offered only to:
investors in an equivalent class under the laws of the country or territory where the offer is made.
Since July 2013, closed-ended funds can be deemed and regulated as restricted collective investment schemes where certain criteria are satisfied. If a fund is deemed to be a collective investment scheme then it is under various obligations, such as the requirement to:
Submit a notification and annual declaration to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
Provide an information memorandum that complies with specific disclosure requirements.
To be marketed in Singapore, a private equity fund must be either:
Approved as an authorised or recognised scheme and register its prospectus with the MAS (a mandatory requirement for retail schemes).
Exempt from authorisation and prospectus registration requirements.
Fund managers usually do not want to create a prospectus, so they try to fall within a "safe harbour". Some of the available "safe harbour" exemptions to lodging a prospectus with the MAS are:
Where offers are made only to institutional investors as detailed in the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289), for example, insurance companies and pension fund managers.
Where the offers are made only to accredited investors (high-net-worth individuals and corporations with certain high-net-worth).
The "private placement exemption", where the offer is made to no more than 50 prospective investors in any 12-month period.
These exemptions come with various resale and publicity restrictions.
Limited partnerships (LPs)
Private equity funds structured as LPs are governed by a partnership agreement that sets out important terms, such as:
Appointment of advisory committee members.
Key person clauses.
Removal of the general partner and the manager.
Clawback or deferral provisions.
LPs are managed by the general partner, who appoints a fund management company as investment manager.
A fund structured as a Singapore-incorporated company is governed by its memorandum and articles of association (now known as the "constitution").
The constitution must be lodged with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority and will then be publicly available. A private equity fund structured as a company would usually also enter into a private shareholders' agreement setting out other, more confidential, terms of the fund.
Interests in portfolio companies
Most common form
Funds typically inject cash into their portfolio companies in return for convertible and redeemable preference shares (RPS) when a minority interest is taken.
Advantages of RPS include:
Flexibility in carrying voting rights.
Preferential rights on liquidation and to receive dividends.
Redemption not being subject to rules on capital reduction or share buyback.
Disadvantages of RPS include:
Being treated as a liability for accounting purposes.
Ranking after creditors and other debt holders (including holders of convertible debt instruments) on liquidation.
Redemption being contingent on the company having sufficient profits or capital.
Convertible debt (such as loan notes or convertible bonds) is also common. The advantage of convertible debt over RPS is the greater repayment flexibility. Holding debt also avoids restrictions applicable to direct shareholdings in controlled sectors.
Under the Companies Act, any issue of shares by a private company requires shareholder approval, and any issue of a new class of shares affecting the rights of any existing class requires the approval of the affected class of shareholders.
Singapore does not impose a tax on capital gains. However, gains derived from the disposal of shares may sometimes be treated as income in nature and subject to income tax. Stamp duty is payable (generally by the buyer) on the transfer of shares at a rate of 0.2% of the net asset value of the shares or the consideration paid, whichever is higher. The position is the same for ordinary and preference shares. No stamp duty is payable in respect of transfers of scripless shares (that is, shares in public companies listed on the Singapore Exchange where the transfer is effected through the central depository book entry system).
Sales by auction process are less common in Singapore than in Europe or the United States, but do happen for desirable target companies. The auction process is generally run by an investment bank or financial advisor in conjunction with the sell-side legal advisors responsible for drafting the auction process documents (including the process letter and information memorandum) and running the due diligence process.
A well-run, competitive auction process is often effective in placing the seller in a strong negotiating position, both in terms of purchase price and sale terms. The seller can set parameters for the transaction at an early stage and make clear the factors that will incentivise the seller in receiving bids and, conversely, make a bid less attractive.
The trend for taking public companies private continues. In the last few years, Singapore has overtaken Indonesia as the most targeted country in Southeast Asia for buyouts. Singapore is the top ASEAN destination for buyouts, with aggregate deal size reaching a record high of US$7.2 billion in 2014, albeit slipping in 2015. This trend emerges from an environment where companies on the Singapore Exchange often trade at a discount to their book values.
The key legislation in this area is:
Singapore Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
Singapore Exchange Listing Manual.
Securities and Futures Act.
There are various ways to make a public company private, which are:
General offer where the co-operation of the target company is not necessary. This is usually coupled with the compulsory acquisition procedure under section 215 of the Companies Act and compulsory delisting under Rule 1303 of the Listing Manual.
Voluntary delisting under Rule 1307 of the Listing Manual.
Scheme of arrangement under section 210 of the Companies Act.
Amalgamation under section 215 of the Companies Act.
The common protections requested in a buyout of a private company include:
Price adjustments and retention funds.
Indemnification, representations and warranties around operations and tax.
Irrevocable undertakings: non-compete and non-solicit undertakings from existing shareholders.
Transaction liability insurance: warranty and indemnity insurance is increasingly used.
Targeted internal rate of return (IRR) provisions are seen in minority stake direct investment deals. Failure to meet the targeted IRR can trigger the following:
option to redeem any redeemable preference shares (RPS);
rights to exercise put options;
other provisions, such as mandatory trade sale provisions.
Common protections sought in a buyout of a listed company include break fees and irrevocable undertakings.
A break fee must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss, not a penalty, and must be minimal, meaning no more than 1% of the value of the target based on the offer price. Securities Industry Committee (SIC) approval is required where a break fee is proposed.
Irrevocable undertakings are often obtained from key shareholders to secure votes in favour of the offer, for example, as part of a general offer.
Common law duties (non-exhaustive list)
Under the common law, company directors must:
Act in good faith and in the company's interests.
Avoid conflicts of interest with the company.
Use their powers for the purpose for which the powers are conferred.
Exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence in the performance of their duties.
The statutory duties of company directors include:
Acting honestly and using reasonable diligence in the discharge of their duties.
Disclosing certain information to the company, including:
information necessary to maintain the register of directors' shareholdings;
changes to interests in shares, debentures, participatory interests, rights, options and contracts.
Notice periods/gardening leave
A suitable notice period is imposed on the management by the private equity investor in an MBO. An individual can be put on garden leave during their notice period.
Restrictive covenants can include the following clauses:
Any non-compete or non-solicitation period must be reasonable to be enforceable. This means that it must be limited in time, business activity and geographical scope to the extent necessary to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.
Measures that allow a private equity fund a degree of control are usually contained in the shareholders' agreement, but can also be written into the company's constitution (that is, its memorandum and articles of association). Examples include:
Board or committee appointment rights.
Sizeable buyout transactions are rare and, consequently, private equity transactions in Singapore have not used leverage (where debt is secured by the assets of the target group) to the same extent seen in other Asian jurisdictions. However, where the deal size dictates, leverage is still an important mechanic. KKR's US$1.1 billion acquisition of Singapore container company Goodpack Limited was reported to comprise debt in excess of six times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA).
Larger transactions occasionally use a combination of senior and mezzanine debt, and high-yield bonds. Mezzanine debt holders are exposed to greater credit risk and consequently expect a higher margin. Mezzanine debt holders can sometimes convert their debt into equity or subscribe for shares in either the acquiring entity or the target at defined times. High-yield bonds are only viable for larger transactions, as a significant quantum of such bonds is necessary to generate liquidity and justify the significant cost and time commitment required to put a public offer of bonds into effect.
The structure of leveraged buyouts commonly includes an element of financial assistance where the assets of the target group are used to support the acquisition debt obligations of the group.
Lenders take security in many forms to protect their investments. These usually include a combination of:
Security over the shares in the bidding company, the target and its group companies.
Debentures taking both fixed and floating charges over tangible and intangible assets.
Assignments of contractual rights.
These are usually combined with other terms in the financing to protect against structural subordination or other actions by the target group that would be disadvantageous to the financiers. Lenders often use several layers of these protections, particularly where there is a need to secure both offshore and onshore components, as is typical in the kinds of multi-jurisdictional deals based in Singapore.
Contractual and structural mechanisms
Lenders seek to minimise uncertainty and conflict in the event of an insolvent liquidation. They can structure the transaction to subordinate particular debt claims (for example where some of the "equity" in the deal is technically being provided by way of a loan), or agree in contract to a hierarchy of payments, such as where mezzanine debt is deployed (see Question 23). This is usually set out in an inter-creditor agreement.
When an acquisition has been financed by a combination of senior and mezzanine debt, it is usual to take advantage of the separate legal personality of each company and insert a new holding company into the acquisition structure. The senior debt is secured lower down in the structure (ideally at operating company level), while mezzanine and high-yield bonds are usually lent to holding companies that do not themselves own assets other than shares in their subsidiaries. This ensures that the senior debt has priority recourse to the assets and cash flow of the group.
Financing arrangements can contain covenants to deal with any prior contractual arrangements (or encumbrances over assets) of the target company and to ensure the necessary procedures are followed to allow any planned financial assistance, where necessary (for example, where public companies are involved). Covenants can also restrict the:
Payment of dividends.
Redemption of shares.
Return of capital to shareholders without the consent of the debt providers.
Covenants can also ensure that the business is managed appropriately to protect the interests of the financiers during the life of the financing.
The Companies Act was amended, effective on 1 July 2015, to partially abolish the prohibition on giving financial assistance in line with changes made to the UK Companies Act in 2006. The prohibition on giving financial assistance no longer applies to private companies, and the "whitewash" procedure is now redundant. However, before providing financial assistance, private companies must carry out a legal and financial analysis of the effect of the transaction and the directors must consider whether the transaction will promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members.
Public companies are not permitted to provide financial assistance for the acquisition of their own shares unless to do so would not materially prejudice:
The interests of the company.
The interests of its shareholders.
The company's ability to pay its creditors.
In addition, the directors of public companies must deem the terms of any financial assistance fair and reasonable.
Priority on insolvent liquidation is determined by law, as follows:
Secured debts (these actually sit outside of the liquidation process, as the secured creditors typically retain rights to deal with their securities first and foremost).
Statutory preferential debts, which are:
costs and expenses of the winding up;
wages and salaries of employees, up to a maximum of five months' salary or SG$7,500 (whichever is less), with the remainder being an unsecured debt;
retrenchment benefits and ex gratia payments under the Companies Act, up to a maximum of SG$7,500, with the remainder being an unsecured debt;
compensation to an employee for injuries suffered in the course of employment under the Workplace Health and Safety Act;
gratuity and retrenchment benefits under the Employment Act.
Portfolio company management
Management can be granted the following incentives:
Equity securities in the company that can be subject to "ratchets" measured by key performance indicators.
Cash bonuses payable on certain targets being met.
Hybrid instruments, such as phantom share option schemes and equity trackers.
All of the above are usually subject to detailed clawback mechanisms so as to ensure that management are not over-incentivised to meet short-term performance objectives at the expense of longer term goals.
There are no specific tax reliefs or incentives available to portfolio company managers investing in their company. A number of Equity Remuneration Incentive Schemes were phased out between 2013 and 2014, but may continue to apply in respect of investments made or shares granted before 1 January 2014.
A company can only pay dividends to shareholders out of its distributable profits. Case law provides guidance on what constitutes a company's distributable profits, but generally to pay out dividends a company must be cash flow and balance sheet solvent.
A company cannot reduce its capital or otherwise return assets to its members (particularly if this would prejudice its creditors) except to the extent and in the manner specified by the Companies Act.
Payments of interest or principal on a debt are not restricted.
Singapore has robust anti-corruption and anti-bribery enforcement, and is often ranked among the least corrupt jurisdictions in the world. Corruption and bribery are criminal offences in Singapore. Sanctions depend on the severity of the crime, and can include either imprisonment or a fine, or both. Directors (who must be natural persons) found guilty of corruption or bribery will also be in breach of their fiduciary and statutory duties to the company, and can be liable for civil damages to the company or for disgorgement of any profits earned through the breach. Directors can also be disqualified from serving as directors if convicted of any one of these offences.
Anti-corruption and anti-bribery provisions can be included in investment documents to require compliance with:
Local laws, including the Singapore Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap. 241).
US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
UK Bribery Act 2010.
Forms of exit
The forms of exit are:
Trade sale. A trade sale is a sale of shares to a third party that is not a financial investor. Private equity sellers are reluctant to give warranties on the operation of the business, so a buyer can purchase warranty and indemnity insurance to cover any business-related warranties given by management.
Initial public offering (IPO). The viability of a public listing in Singapore is dependent on the ability of the company to meet the Singapore Exchange listing criteria. The disadvantage of an IPO is that the private equity fund may be unable to dispose all of its shares at the time of the IPO and may be subject to a lock-up period (typically six to 12 months) for its retained stake, potentially exposing the fund to share price fluctuations and liquidity risk.
Secondary buyout. This involves a sale of a fund's stake in the company to another financial investor. As with trade sales, the availability and source of warranty protection is an issue to be considered.
Advantages and disadvantages
See above, Forms of exit.
Forms of exit
The forms of exit that are typically used to end a private equity fund's investment in an unsuccessful or distressed company include:
Sale to a "white knight" investor. This represents the simplest exit route, although finding an investor willing to put money (even if a deep discount is offered) into a distressed company can be a challenge.
Redemption of shares for cash. Shares held by the fund must be redeemable in the first place, and the company must have sufficient financing in place to finance the redemption.
Voluntary winding up. The company must be solvent, and the winding up must be approved by special resolution of the members. The fund, as a shareholder, ranks after creditors in the order of priority when a distribution is made.
Scheme of arrangement. Creditors agree through a court-sanctioned statutory scheme to reschedule their debts, while allowing the company to carry on as a going-concern. The company can bind a dissenting minority of creditors and members representing up to 25% in value and 50% in number.
Advantages and disadvantages
See above, Forms of Exit.
Private equity/venture capital associations
Singapore Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (SVCA)
Status. Non-governmental organisation founded under the patronage of the Singapore Economic Development Board.
Membership. Exceeds 100 and continues to grow with the industry's development.
Principal activities. The SVCA strives to:
Promote the professional development of the industry through awards, training, workshops and conferences.
Facilitate interaction and collaboration among its members through regular networking events.
Act as a platform for dialogue on regulatory and policy issues relating to venture capital and private equity through data research, feedback and consultation with members and regulatory authorities.
Build connections to centres of venture capital and private equity activities in the region through active participation at regional and global venture capital and private equity initiatives.
Published guidelines. The SVCA publishes the annual Singapore Venture Capital and Private Equity Directory.
Information sources. Please see website above.
Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited
Description. Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited is the main trading platform for Singapore listed companies.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) – Securities Industry Council (SIC)
Description. The MAS oversees the SIC. The SIC has regulatory oversight of takeovers of public companies in Singapore.
Singapore Government Website
Description. This is a government website for online publication of legislation that is maintained by the Attorney General's Chambers.
Matthew Bousfield, Senior Associate
Hogan Lovells Lee & Lee
T +65 6302 2565
F +65 6538 7077
Professional qualifications. England and Wales, Lawyer, 2010
Areas of practice. Corporate; M&A; private equity and buyouts; commercial; employment.
Hogan Lovells Lee & Lee
Professional qualifications. England and Wales, Lawyer, 2014
Areas of practice. Corporate; M&A; private equity and buyouts; commercial; employment.
Mark Cooper, Partner
Hogan Lovells Lee & Lee
Professional qualifications. England and Wales, Lawyer, 2005
Areas of practice. Corporate; M&A; private equity and buyouts; commercial, equity capital markets.
Adrian Chan, Partner
Hogan Lovells Lee & Lee
Professional qualifications. Singapore, Lawyer, 1989
Areas of practice. Corporate; M&A; private equity and buyouts; commercial, equity capital markets; employment; corporate financing and restructuring.