SEC Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rule Prohibiting Conflicts in ABS Transactions | Practical Law

SEC Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rule Prohibiting Conflicts in ABS Transactions | Practical Law

The SEC has extended the comment period for its proposed rule under Dodd-Frank that would prohibit underwriters, sponsors and other parties involved in the creation and distribution of asset-backed securities (ABS) from engaging in transactions that would create or result in a material conflict of interest with any investor in the ABS.

SEC Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rule Prohibiting Conflicts in ABS Transactions

by PLC Finance and PLC Corporate & Securities
Published on 14 Dec 2011USA (National/Federal)
The SEC has extended the comment period for its proposed rule under Dodd-Frank that would prohibit underwriters, sponsors and other parties involved in the creation and distribution of asset-backed securities (ABS) from engaging in transactions that would create or result in a material conflict of interest with any investor in the ABS.
On December 13, 2011, the SEC issued a release announcing the extension of the comment period for its proposed rule under the Dodd-Frank Act prohibiting certain conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions. Proposed Rule 127B under the Securities Act would prohibit certain parties involved in the creation and distribution of ABS from engaging in any transaction that would create or result in a material conflict of interest with any investor in the ABS for one year after the date of the first closing of the sale of the securities. In particular, the SEC is seeking additional comments on the potential interplay between the proposed rule and the Volcker Rule (see Legal Update, Agencies Issue Proposed Regulations Implementing the Volcker Rule).
The SEC will accept comments until January 13, 2012.