Swiss Supreme Court considers to what extent an arbitral award must explicitly address relevant evidence | Practical Law

Swiss Supreme Court considers to what extent an arbitral award must explicitly address relevant evidence | Practical Law

The Swiss Supreme Court considered whether, under certain circumstances, there is a violation of the right to be heard where it could be proved that an arbitral tribunal had considered specific evidence, but had not explicitly referred to that evidence in its award.

Swiss Supreme Court considers to what extent an arbitral award must explicitly address relevant evidence

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 2-539-2006 (Approx. 4 pages)

Swiss Supreme Court considers to what extent an arbitral award must explicitly address relevant evidence

by PD Dr Nathalie Voser (Partner) and James U Menz, JD (Associate), Schellenberg Wittmer (Zurich)
Published on 28 Aug 2013Switzerland
The Swiss Supreme Court considered whether, under certain circumstances, there is a violation of the right to be heard where it could be proved that an arbitral tribunal had considered specific evidence, but had not explicitly referred to that evidence in its award.