Ogletree Deakins: Rhode Island Court Rejects Tortious Interference Claim Against Current Employees Who Secretly Operated Competitor | Practical Law

Ogletree Deakins: Rhode Island Court Rejects Tortious Interference Claim Against Current Employees Who Secretly Operated Competitor | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., discusses Aid Maintenance Co. v. Realty Maintenance Service, Inc., in which the Rhode Island Superior Court held, as a matter of law, that a cleaning services employer failed to show that its employees tortiously interfered with its current and prospective customers despite showing that its employees simultaneously worked and secretly operated a competing business. The court ruled in favor of the employees, noting that the parties had no noncompete agreements, the employer was unable to quantify its damages and  the employees' conduct was ordinary competitive behavior in that industry.

Ogletree Deakins: Rhode Island Court Rejects Tortious Interference Claim Against Current Employees Who Secretly Operated Competitor

by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Published on 07 Apr 2014Rhode Island, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., discusses Aid Maintenance Co. v. Realty Maintenance Service, Inc., in which the Rhode Island Superior Court held, as a matter of law, that a cleaning services employer failed to show that its employees tortiously interfered with its current and prospective customers despite showing that its employees simultaneously worked and secretly operated a competing business. The court ruled in favor of the employees, noting that the parties had no noncompete agreements, the employer was unable to quantify its damages and the employees' conduct was ordinary competitive behavior in that industry.