Svea Court of Appeal upholds an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause | Practical Law

Svea Court of Appeal upholds an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause | Practical Law

In Svea hovrätt case T 2454-14, the Svea Court of Appeal in Stockholm considered the validity of an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause in a case between the Russian Federation and I.M. Badprim S.R.L.

Svea Court of Appeal upholds an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 2-600-8305 (Approx. 4 pages)

Svea Court of Appeal upholds an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause

by Sverker Bonde, Advokatfirman Delphi, Stockholm, Sweden
Published on 18 Feb 2015 • Sweden
In Svea hovrätt case T 2454-14, the Svea Court of Appeal in Stockholm considered the validity of an inconsistent and potentially pathological arbitration clause in a case between the Russian Federation and I.M. Badprim S.R.L.