Presence of third party funding does not of itself justify security for costs order (ICSID) | Practical Law

Presence of third party funding does not of itself justify security for costs order (ICSID) | Practical Law

In EuroGas Inc and Belmont Resources Inc v Slovak Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/14/14) (Procedural Order No. 3), an ICSID tribunal issued a procedural order in which it considered the claimants' and respondent's requests for provisional measures under Article 47 of the ICSID Convention and ICSID Arbitration Rule 39.

Presence of third party funding does not of itself justify security for costs order (ICSID)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 2-617-7572 (Approx. 5 pages)

Presence of third party funding does not of itself justify security for costs order (ICSID)

by Practical Law Arbitration
Published on 29 Jul 2015 • International
In EuroGas Inc and Belmont Resources Inc v Slovak Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/14/14) (Procedural Order No. 3), an ICSID tribunal issued a procedural order in which it considered the claimants' and respondent's requests for provisional measures under Article 47 of the ICSID Convention and ICSID Arbitration Rule 39.