No permission required to appeal arbitration award where parties' agreement silent | Practical Law

No permission required to appeal arbitration award where parties' agreement silent | Practical Law

In Royal & Sunalliance Insurance PLC v BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 743 (Comm) the court had to consider whether permission to appeal an award under section 69(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) was required where the parties had agreed a provision in the underlying contract that an appeal could be made on a question of law, but that provision was silent as to whether permission from the court was still required.

No permission required to appeal arbitration award where parties' agreement silent

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 3-381-3546 (Approx. 5 pages)

No permission required to appeal arbitration award where parties' agreement silent

by PLC Dispute Resolution
Published on 22 Apr 2008England, Northern Ireland, Wales
In Royal & Sunalliance Insurance PLC v BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 743 (Comm) the court had to consider whether permission to appeal an award under section 69(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) was required where the parties had agreed a provision in the underlying contract that an appeal could be made on a question of law, but that provision was silent as to whether permission from the court was still required.
Mr Justice Walker held that on a true construction of the relevant provision in the underlying contract, permission was not required to bring the appeal.
Whilst the case really turned on the construction of the clause in question, it serves as a reminder to practitioners of the importance of clear and precise drafting of arbitration agreements. Whilst the claimant was ultimately successful in demonstrating leave was not required, this issue could have been avoided altogether had the provision expressly provided so.