Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: How are sub meters treated under the CRC? | Practical Law

Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: How are sub meters treated under the CRC? | Practical Law

An Ask the team article on how sub meters are treated under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC).

Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: How are sub meters treated under the CRC?

Practical Law UK Legal Update 3-503-0137 (Approx. 9 pages)

Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: How are sub meters treated under the CRC?

by PLC Environment and PLC Property
Published on 10 Aug 2010UK
An Ask the team article on how sub meters are treated under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC).

Speedread

An Ask the team article on how sub meters are treated under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC).

Question

Terms that appear in capital letters in this Ask the team article are defined in Practice note, CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: PLC glossary and abbreviations.
PLC has received a number of queries that relate to the treatment of sub meters under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC). Various different scenarios were described in these queries but most of them posed a central question: whether the definition of metering device in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme Order 2010 (SI 2010/768) (the CRC Order) was sufficiently wide to include sub meters.
PLC has collated all these questions into a single "Ask the team". The different scenarios are dealt with in the section entitled Explanation of the various examples below.

Background regarding the treatment of sub meters under the CRC

Responsibility for supply

The CRC Order provides that where an organisation is "responsible" for an electricity supply:
Where an organisation is responsible for supplies of gas and other fuels it must similarly consider whether it must report those supplies and surrender Allowances in respect of emissions associated with those supplies.
Prior to this concept of responsibility for an energy supply, the draft CRC Order required organisations to assess their qualification for the CRC and report their energy supplies where they were the "counterparty to the energy supply contract".
The CRC Order does not contain a definition of "responsibility for a supply". There are many factors that need to be considered to determine when an organisation is responsible for an energy supply, including:
  • Whether the organisation is the named customer on the energy supply contract.
  • Whether the organisation consumes the energy supplied.
  • What sort of meter measures the supply.
This Ask the team concentrates on the meter type and its influence on responsibility for the supply
The relevant parts of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order regarding the concept of responsibility for an energy supply are:
  • Paragraph 1 (which relates to electricity supplies).
  • Paragraph 2 (which relates to gas supplies).
  • Paragraph 3 (which relates to other fuel types).
Paragraphs 1 and 2 require a supply for the purposes of the CRC, to be made through a metering device (except in the case of Dynamic Supply in relation to electricity). Metering device is defined in both paragraphs as being a device where the electricity or gas supply (as relevant) is charged for, as measured by the device.

Traditional interpretation of metering device as meaning "fiscal meter"

The conventional interpretation of the wording regarding metering device in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order was that it referred to a fiscal meter. The term "fiscal meter" is usually used by energy managers and those in the energy industry to refer to meters that an electricity or gas supplier uses to calculate the bill which it presents to its customer for payment.
This interpretation was supported by the wording at page 30 of the version of the CRC User Guide published in January 2010 and also the wording at page 50 of the Response to the Consultation published in October 2009. Both these documents mention the need for the supply to be measured by a fiscal meter. The CRC User Guide does not define fiscal meter but the Response Document defines fiscal meter as "one from which data is used to [for] billing purposes".
The Response to the Consultation goes on to say that "where a supply is not measured by a fiscal meter (for example, when electricity is delivered via private wire or is measured by a sub meter), the conditions outlined above are not met and the supply is not captured under the CRC."

Wider interpretation of metering device

However, the definition of metering device in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order appears to be wide enough to cover sub metering.
In response to the queries that PLC received, we contacted the Environment Agency's (EA's) CRC Helpdesk asking for clarification of the treatment of sub meters under the CRC. Specifically, we asked if an organisation received a supply of energy from a third party that was measured by a sub meter and, if that organisation was charged by the third party for the energy it consumed on the basis of reading from that sub meter, would the organisation be responsible for that supply under the CRC?
The CRC Helpdesk confirmed to PLC that the definition of metering device in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC order could include sub meters used for payment purposes and that it will also capture some types of private wire supply arrangements.
PLC requested further clarification from the CRC Helpdesk regarding how sub meters installed in relation to leased premises could be treated under the CRC, particularly in view of the landlord and tenant rule. For more information on this rule, see The landlord and tenant rule below.
PLC was concerned that in buildings where the landlord procures energy for the building as a whole (monitored by a main meter) but distributes it to tenants (with each demise being monitored by a sub meter) then both the landlord and the tenant might be said to have responsibility for the supplies to the demised areas, because both satisfy the conditions in paragraphs 1 or 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order (as relevant).
  • The landlord's responsibility would be based on his contract with the supplier and the bills charged to the landlord by that supplier based on the main meter reading. The fact that the landlord did not consume the energy would be ignored owing to the landlord and tenant rule.
  • The tenant's responsibility would be based on its use of the energy supplied to it by the landlord, measured by the sub meter and billed by the landlord to the tenant based on the measurements by that sub meter.
This might result in double counting of energy supplies to demised premises.
In March the EA's guidance on meters and metering was published and the definition of metering devices on page 10 echoes the definition of metering device in the CRC Order. The EA guidance also states that "this definition includes private wire arrangements and sub-meters where a metering device is used to measure electricity and/or gas supply for charging purposes."
In April 2010, the CRC User Guide was republished and the reference in it on page 30 to fiscal meters was amended to refer to the wider definition of metering device in the CRC Order.
In response to PLC's request for clarification, the CRC Helpdesk has confirmed that:
  • A tenant will not be responsible for any supplies that it receives from its landlord regardless of whether the supply is sub metered.
  • "There will be no requirement to double account for emissions" where a tenant could, under the definition of energy supplies in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order, be regarded as being responsible for a supply of energy.
  • They will clarify this point in their guidance.
PLC takes this to mean that:
  • The EA do not expect tenants, whose landlords procure energy for them, to register for the CRC in respect of those electricity supplies to the demised premises.
  • The EA will not take enforcement action against tenants who exclude these electricity supplies when assessing whether they should participate in the CRC. For more information about when an organisation will have to participate in the CRC, see Qualification Criteria above.
Depending on how and when this is clarified, tenants who are in such a position may wish to obtain direct confirmation in writing from the CRC Helpdesk that they need not include these sub metered supplies in their assessment of their need to register as a Participant in the Introductory Phase of the CRC or (if the tenant is a Participant) in any future reports.

Qualification Criteria

It is important to remember that an organisation will only be required to register as a participant in the Introductory Phase of the CRC if it satisfies all of these criteria:
  • The organisation was responsible for electricity supplies in 2008.
  • The organisation, during 2008, was responsible for electricity supplied through at least one Settled Half Hourly meter. This could be in any part of the organisation and within any property owned or occupied by that organisation.
  • During 2008, the aggregate of electricity supplies through Half Hourly meters (HHMs) for which the organisation was responsible amounted to 6,000 MWh or more (excluding some kinds of supplies). Half hourly electricity supplies could be made through a Settled HHM or a Non-Settled HHM.
Therefore, the fact that the organisation is responsible for an electricity supply will not, of itself, determine that it must register as a Participant in respect of a particular Phase of the CRC.
For more information on the Qualification Criteria and the process for deciding whether to register as a Participant, see:

The landlord and tenant rule

Where a landlord procures a supply of energy which it then on-supplies to its tenants, consuming none of the energy itself, it remains responsible for that supply. The usual rule (allowing Unconsumed Supplies to be excluded) is overridden by this landlord and tenant rule (paragraph 14, Schedule 1, CRC Order). For more details see Practice note, CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: overview: Landlords and tenants.

Explanation of the various examples

Who is responsible for a supply where a company sells part of its freehold site and supplies electricity to the buyer through sub meters?

Tabular or graphic material set at this point is not displayable.
In this example, Company A is a big manufacturing company with a large freehold site. Company A sells part of the site to Company B. Prior to the sale, Company A installs sub meters in the two buildings that Company B occupies. The sale contract with Company B provides that Company A will continue to procure electricity for the entire site (including the part that has been sold) and that Company B will pay Company A for its share of the bill that Company A receives from its electricity supplier, based on the readings from the sub meters. Effectively, Company A is acting as an intermediary supplier to Company B.

Effect for Company A

Under the supply rule in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order, Company A will be responsible for the electricity supply that it consumes. The electricity that it passes on to Company B will be an Unconsumed Supply in relation to Company A (paragraph 13, Schedule 1). When Company A is assessing whether it should participate in the CRC and (if so), which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for, it needs only to consider the electricity that it has consumed (not that which it on-supplied to Company B). For more information, see Responsibility for Supply above.

Effect for Company B

Although members of the electricity industry would not describe the sub meter in this example as a fiscal meter, the CRC Helpdesk have confirmed that in their view, it falls within the definition of metering device in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order. So Company B will be responsible for the electricity that it consumes and which is measured by the sub meter.
Company B must therefore consider that supply when assessing whether it should participate in the CRC and (if so) which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for. For more information, see Responsibility for Supply above.
Based on the original view, many organisations may have excluded sub metered supplies when they assessed whether they need to register as a participant for the Introductory Phase of the CRC. They should review their assessment regarding the need to participate in the Introductory Phase to see if the addition of sub metered supplies which meet the requirements in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order will change their conclusion.

Who is responsible for a supply where a company sells part of its freehold site and supplies unmetered electricity to the buyer?

Tabular or graphic material set at this point is not displayable.
In this example, Company A is a big manufacturing company with a large freehold site. Company A sells part of the site to Company B. The supplies of electricity to the sold part of the site are not separately metered or sub metered. The sale contract with Company B provides that Company A will continue to procure electricity for the entire site (including the part that has been sold) and that Company B will pay Company A for a fair share of the bill that Company A receives from its electricity supplier. Effectively, Company A is acting as an intermediary supplier to Company B.

Effect for Company A

Under the supply rule in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order, Company A will be responsible for the electricity supply that it consumes. The electricity that it passes on to Company B will be an Unconsumed Supply in relation to Company A (paragraph 13, Schedule 1). When Company A is assessing whether it should participate in the CRC and (if so), which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for, it needs only to consider the electricity that it has consumed (not that which it on-supplied to Company B). For more information, see Responsibility for Supply above.
As the supply to Company B is not sub metered, Company A will have to estimate its own share of the overall electricity supply to the entire site. This estimate will be subject to the estimation adjustment of 10% in Company A's Annual Reports (if it is required to participate in the CRC). For more information about the rules regarding estimated supplies, see the Environment Agency guidance: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: Estimation techniques.

Effect for Company B

The CRC Helpdesk have indicated that the electricity supplied to Company B will qualify as a supply to B (within paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order) notwithstanding the fact that the only meter measuring the supply is the meter that measures the entire supply to Company A. The CRC Helpdesk consider that there is nothing in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to require that the supply has to be measured by a metering device when it passes from Company A to Company B. All paragraph 1(1)(c) of Schedule 1 states is that the supply has to be measured by a metering device.
Company B must, therefore, consider the electricity supplies which it receives from Company A, when assessing whether it (Company B) should participate in the CRC and (if so) which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for. For more information, see Responsibility for Supply above.
Company B will have to estimate how much electricity was supplied to it (since there is no sub meter) and this estimate will be subject to the estimation adjustment of 10% in Company B's Annual Reports (if it is required to participate in the CRC). For more information about the rules regarding estimated supplies, see the Environment Agency guidance: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: Estimation techniques.

Who is responsible for a supply where a company leases part of its site and supplies unmetered electricity to the tenant?

Tabular or graphic material set at this point is not displayable.
In this example, Company A is a big manufacturing company with a large freehold site. Company A leases part of the site to Company B. The electricity supply to the demised part is not separately metered, nor is there a sub meter. The lease with Company B requires the landlord, Company A, to supply electricity to the demised premises and requires the tenant (Company B) to pay Company A for a fair share of the bill that Company A receives from its electricity supplier. Effectively, Company A is acting as an intermediary supplier to its tenant, Company B.

Effect for Company A

Under the supply rule in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order, Company A will be responsible for the electricity supply that it consumes and, owing to the provisions of paragraph 14 of Schedule 1 (the landlord and tenant rule), it will also be responsible for the electricity that Company B consumes.
Company A will need to consider the electricity supply to the entire site when assessing whether it should participate in the CRC and (if so) which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for.

Effect for Company B

Company B is not responsible for the supply of electricity at all.

Wider application of this scenario

This analysis will also apply
  • Where Company B is a licensee rather than a tenant.
  • Where the demised premises are part of a larger building (rather than part of a larger freehold site). For example, where each floor in an office block is leased to a different tenant and where the landlord procures the energy supplies for both the common parts and all the demised areas and then charges each tenant for its share of the energy consumed in the building, the landlord will be responsible under the CRC for all those energy supplies.

Who is responsible for a supply where a company leases part of its site and supplies electricity to the tenant through sub meters?

Tabular or graphic material set at this point is not displayable.
In this example, Company A is a big manufacturing company with a large freehold site. Company A leases part of the site to Company B. Prior to grant of the lease, Company A installs sub meters to the demised part. The lease with Company B requires the landlord, (Company A) to supply electricity to the demised premises and requires the tenant (Company B) to pay its landlord for the electricity supplied, based on the readings from the sub meters. Effectively, Company A is acting as an intermediary supplier to its tenant, Company B.

Effect for Company A

Under the supply rule in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order, Company A will be responsible for the electricity supply that it consumes. Owing to the provisions of paragraph 14 of Schedule 1 (the landlord and tenant rule) it will not be able to claim that the electricity supply to the demised premises is an Unconsumed Supply. Company A will, therefore, be responsible under the CRC for the entire supply of electricity to the site (including the demised premises).
Company A will need to consider the electricity supply to the whole site when assessing whether it should participate in the CRC and (if so) which supplies it should report or surrender Allowances for.

Effect for Company B

As explained in Wider interpretation of metering device above, the CRC Helpdesk have confirmed that in their view, a sub meter used for payment purposes falls within the definition of metering device in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Order. In the current example, this means that because the electricity supply to the demised premises is sub metered, Company B would technically be responsible under the CRC for the supply of electricity to the demised premises.
However, the CRC Helpdesk has also confirmed that it does not consider that Company B is responsible for these sub metered supplies. Based on this confirmation, Company B does need not include these supplies when assessing whether it should register as a participant in the CRC or (if it is a Participant already), whether to report those supplies or surrender Allowances to cover the emissions associated with them. For more information, see Wider interpretation of metering device above.

Wider application of this scenario

This analysis will also apply
  • Where Company B is a licensee rather than a tenant.
  • Where the demised premises are part of a larger building (rather than part of a larger freehold site). For example, where each floor in an office block is leased to a different tenant, the landlord procures the energy supplies for both the common parts and all the demised areas, and then charges each tenant for its share of the energy consumed in the building by reference to the sub meter readings. Here the landlord will be responsible under the CRC for all those energy supplies and the tenants (although, in theory, they are also responsible) will not be asked to take those supplies into account.

Further information

For more information on:

Comments

If you have any comments on this, or any other, Ask the team, please mail the PLC Environment team at [email protected].