US registration and reporting changes for investment advisers | Practical Law

US registration and reporting changes for investment advisers | Practical Law

The United Kingdom update for December 2010 for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

US registration and reporting changes for investment advisers

Practical Law Legal Update 3-504-2197 (Approx. 3 pages)

US registration and reporting changes for investment advisers

by Nathan J. Greene , Jesse P. Kanach and Robert Zecher, Shearman & Sterling LLP
Published on 23 Dec 2010
The United Kingdom update for December 2010 for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

Speedread

Fundamental changes in the regulatory landscape for investment advisers is on the not-so-distant horizon, stemming from a slew of proposed SEC rules that add colour to the expanded regulation mandates set forth in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Effective from 21 July 2011, the heavily relied upon "private adviser" exemption has been revoked.
Fundamental changes in the regulatory landscape for investment advisers is on the not-so-distant horizon, stemming from a slew of proposed SEC rules that add colour to the expanded regulation mandates set forth in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Effective from 21 July 2011, the heavily relied upon "private adviser" exemption has been revoked. What will be left is a new narrowly crafted "foreign private adviser" exemption and two quasi-exemptions, giving rise to two new categories of so called "exempt reporting advisers"; investment advisers who:
  • Manage solely private funds and have less than $150 million in AUM in the United States.
  • Manage solely venture capital funds.
Significant new public reporting obligations for registered investment advisers, as well as exempt reporting advisers, also are proposed. Comments on the various proposals must be submitted to the SEC by 24 January 2011.
The new foreign private adviser exemption would be available if a non-US adviser:
  • Has no place of business in the United States.
  • Manages (directly or indirectly) no more than $25 million in assets of US persons.
  • Manages assets for 14 or fewer US persons.
  • Does not hold itself out publicly in the United States as an investment adviser.
  • Does not manage a fund regulated under the US Investment Company Act of 1940.
Exempt reporting advisers will avoid most of the substantive requirements of the Advisers Act yet are proposed to be subject to broad (and public) disclosure requirements, SEC examinations and any applicable US state registration requirements. During the SEC's 19 November open meeting, SEC Commissioner Kathleen L. Casey, expressed concern that the benefits of being an exempt reporting adviser "are effectively rendered empty by [the SEC's] parallel proposal imposing reporting requirements on these advisers". Using the same Form ADV registration document as fully registered advisers, exempt reporting advisers would fill out a subset of items from Part 1 of Form ADV, including the substantial private fund reporting requirements noted below.
One category of exempt reporting advisers, called "private fund advisers", includes any adviser that:
  • Advises solely private funds.
  • In the aggregate, manages less than $150 million in AUM in the United States.
Under the proposed rules, a private fund adviser may manage an unlimited number of private funds, but if the adviser has just one other type of client (for example; a separate account), the adviser would have to register with the SEC unless another exemption is available. As proposed, the $150 million threshold, calculated quarterly, reflects both contributions and redemptions of investor capital, and investment appreciation and depreciation.
For purposes of "private fund advisers" the SEC's proposed rules treat US and non-US advisers quite differently. Whereas a US adviser would count all assets of all private funds it manages, a non-US adviser, an adviser whose principal office and place of business is outside of the United States, may disregard accounts and investment funds managed from outside of the United States, regardless of the extent of investments by US persons. Under the proposed rules, it appears to be irrelevant where a non-US firm's funds are formed or domiciled. The SEC instead seems to be looking only to the location of the fund's management.
The other category of exempt reporting adviser is provided for in what the SEC calls the "venture capital exemption". Unlike the private fund adviser exemption, the venture capital exemption would apply its provisions equally to non-US advisers. A "venture capital fund" would be a private fund that:
  • Holds itself out to investors as being a venture capital fund.
  • Invests only in equity securities of private operating companies with the purpose of primarily providing operating or business expansion capital (not to buy out other investors).
  • Is not leveraged (other than limited short-term borrowing), and its portfolio companies do not borrow in connection with the fund’s investment.
  • Has an arrangement whereby the fund or the investment adviser offers to provide, and does so provide, significant guidance concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of the qualifying portfolio company, or controls its portfolio companies.
  • Does not offer investors redemption or other similar liquidity rights. This exemption is narrowly crafted and does not include typical private equity funds.
All registered advisers, as well as exempt reporting advisers, are proposed to be subject to extensive new public reporting requirements. Managers of private funds must provide no fewer than 29 separate items of information about each fund. Also, affiliate-by-affiliate disclosure will have to be made about all financial industry "related persons" rather than solely those that are investment advisers or broker-dealers.
Many of the new responsibilities for investment advisers will be unfamiliar and the private fund reporting requirements will be a significant change to the status quo. The importance of preparing for registration and reporting in the coming months cannot be underestimated. Firms still considering whether alternatives to registration exist must now identify the practical effects which these industry changes will have on their business and begin to adapt accordingly. Finally, it is important to note that the SEC proposals are subject to change; final rules cannot be expected until February 2011, at the earliest.
For more information on this topic, please click here.