IRS Final Regulations Clarify Premium Tax Credit Rules | Practical Law

IRS Final Regulations Clarify Premium Tax Credit Rules | Practical Law

On May 18, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations addressing the premium tax credit rules under the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) insurance exchanges. The regulations provide numerous clarifications reflecting comments received on proposed regulations addressing the premium tax credit that were issued in August 2011.

IRS Final Regulations Clarify Premium Tax Credit Rules

Practical Law Legal Update 3-519-5576 (Approx. 5 pages)

IRS Final Regulations Clarify Premium Tax Credit Rules

by PLC Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Published on 22 May 2012USA (National/Federal)
On May 18, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations addressing the premium tax credit rules under the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) insurance exchanges. The regulations provide numerous clarifications reflecting comments received on proposed regulations addressing the premium tax credit that were issued in August 2011.
On May 18, 2012, the IRS issued final regulations addressing the health insurance premium tax credit under the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) insurance exchanges (for more information, see Practice Note, The Health Insurance Exchange and Related Requirements under the ACA). The regulations, which finalize proposed regulations issued in August 2011 (see Legal Update, HHS and IRS Proposed Regulations for Health Insurance Exchanges), provide guidance to:
  • Individuals who enroll in qualified health plans (QHPs) through the exchanges and claim the premium tax credit.
  • The exchanges that make available QHPs to individuals and employers.
Starting in 2014, individuals who purchase coverage under a QHP through an exchange can receive a premium tax credit. To do so, however, an individual must not be eligible for other minimum essential coverage, which includes coverage under an employer-sponsored plan that:
  • Is affordable to the employee.
  • Provides minimum value, which means the plan's share of the total allowed costs of benefits provided under the plan is at least 60%.
The regulations make a number of clarifications to the proposed regulations, including:
  • Information provided about affordability. Under a regulatory safe harbor, an employer-sponsored plan is unaffordable for an employee for a plan year if:
    • the employee enrolls in a QHP for a period that coincides with the plan year; and
    • an exchange determines that the plan is unaffordable for that plan year.
    Individuals who apply for advance payment of the premium tax credit must provide the exchange with information on whether employer-sponsored coverage is available to them. Under the final regulations, the safe harbor:
    • does not apply if an individual, with reckless disregard for the facts, provides incorrect information to an exchange about the individual's portion of the annual premium for employer coverage; and
    • will not carry over to later plan years.
  • Duration of affordability safe harbor. Under the final regulations, the affordability safe harbor applies until the availability of employer-sponsored coverage changes. To extend the safe harbor in the event that new or different employer-sponsored coverage becomes available after the individual enrolls in a QHP, the individual must:
    • inform the exchange of the new or different coverage.
    • obtain a new affordability determination.
  • Eligibility for government-sponsored minimum essential coverage. An individual is allowed a premium tax credit for a particular month if, among other things, the individual is not eligible for minimum essential coverage, which is defined to include government-sponsored programs such as Medicare or Medicaid. The final regulations extend the timing rule under the proposed regulations for when an individual is treated as eligible for a government-sponsored program. Under the final regulations, an individual who does not complete the requirements for receiving benefits under a government-sponsored program by the last day of the third full calendar month after the event that establishes eligibility is regarded as eligible for the coverage on the first day of the fourth calendar month.
  • Definition of federal poverty line. The definition of federal poverty line now includes a rule that applies if:
    • married taxpayers reside in separate states with different federal poverty guidelines; or
    • a taxpayer resides in states with different federal poverty guidelines during the year.
    The final regulations clarify that the higher of the federal poverty lines will apply in these situations.
  • Impact of automatic enrollment. The final regulations address commenters' concerns that an individual could be automatically enrolled for minimum essential coverage under an employer-sponsored plan that is unaffordable or does not provide minimum value, and become ineligible for the premium tax credit. Automatic enrollment could occur:
    • under a new requirement added by the ACA, for which implementing regulations are being developed (for more information, see Practice Note, Automatic Enrollment under the ACA);
    • due to administrative error; or
    • because of automatic re-enrollment in a plan in a subsequent year.
    Under the final regulations, an employee is generally not treated as enrolled in an employer-sponsored plan year if the employee:
    • is automatically enrolled in the plan for that plan year; and
    • terminates the coverage before the later of a two-part deadline set out in the final regulations.
  • Wellness incentives and Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). Commenters sought clarification on how wellness incentives impact the premium affordability determination. The final regulations suggest that additional guidance will address how the affordability of employer-sponsored coverage reflects:
  • Eligibility for minimum essential coverage. An individual who enrolls in an employer-sponsored plan is generally ineligible for the premium tax credit even if the plan:
    • is unaffordable; or
    • does not offer minimum value.
    Addressing the duration of this ineligibility (for example, where an individual terminates coverage during a plan year), the final regulations clarify that an individual is regarded as eligible for minimum essential coverage under an employer-sponsored plan by enrolling in the plan or continuation coverage only for months the individual is enrolled in the coverage.
  • Married taxpayers filing separately. Married couples that fail to file a joint return are not allowed a premium tax credit. Also, if a married couple receives advance credit payments but does not file a joint return, they must repay the advance payments. The final regulations do not include special rules for individuals who receive advance payments but face difficulties in satisfying the joint return requirement (for example, because of a pending divorce or domestic abuse). However, the IRS indicated that it will propose additional guidance addressing this situation.
Although these latest regulations provide guidance on how the insurance exchanges under the ACA will operate, additional guidance is still needed, including rules for determining minimum value. In Notice 2012-31, the IRS recently sought additional comments on possible methods for determining minimum value, and additional guidance is expected on that issue (see Legal Update, IRS Notices Request Comments on Minimum Value and Reporting Requirements).