Delaware 2014 Statutory Amendments Signed into Law | Practical Law

Delaware 2014 Statutory Amendments Signed into Law | Practical Law

The 2014 amendments to the DGCL, LLC Act, DRULPA and DRUPA have been signed into law.

Delaware 2014 Statutory Amendments Signed into Law

Practical Law Legal Update 3-575-5407 (Approx. 6 pages)

Delaware 2014 Statutory Amendments Signed into Law

by Practical Law Corporate & Securities
Published on 24 Jul 2014Delaware
The 2014 amendments to the DGCL, LLC Act, DRULPA and DRUPA have been signed into law.
On July 15, 2014, the amendments to the DGCL, the Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act), the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (DRULPA) and the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Agreement (DRUPA) proposed earlier this year were signed into law by the governor of Delaware. The amendments will become effective on August 1, 2014.

DGCL Amendments

The amendments to Section 251(h) of the DGCL will apply to merger agreements signed on or after August 1, 2014. All other DGCL amendments will be effective on August 1, 2014.

Section 251(h) Tender Offers

The amendments to Section 251(h) clarify its implementation following questions that arose after its introduction in August 2013. The primary amendments will have the following effects:
  • Eliminate the prohibition against "interested stockholders" taking part in the Section 251(h) process. The advantages of this amendment are that it:
    • makes Section 251(h) tender offers available to large or controlling stockholders; and
    • removes the confusion over whether tender and support agreements and rollover agreements could cause the buyer to cross the interested stockholder threshold. These agreements can now be entered into with no concern for disqualifying the tender offer from the benefits of Section 251(h).
  • Clarify that a merger agreement may "permit or require" the merger to be effected under Section 251(h), rather than force the buyer to opt in conclusively into Section 251(h). The statute will also be clear that the requirement to proceed to a merger "as soon as practicable" following the tender offer will only apply to tender offers consummated under Section 251(h). These amendments will permit the parties to the agreement to change course and effect the merger under a different statutory provision, such as a long-form merger under Section 253. This permissiveness is useful if, for example, a delay for regulatory approval necessitates the tender offer to stay open for longer than the parties intended. Such a delay can be problematic for the buyer because the board of the target company customarily keeps its fiduciary out open until either the stockholders approve the transaction in a merger or the shares are accepted by the buyer in a tender offer. By shifting to Section 253, the parties can bring the merger to a vote and close the period for the fiduciary out.
  • Clarify that shares of stock tendered into an offer are not counted for purposes of Section 251(h) unless irrevocably accepted for exchange and received by the depositary before the expiration of the offer. This amendment confirms that:
    • ownership of the necessary amount of stock to proceed to a second-step merger is determined on the basis of the outstanding shares of the target company, not the fully diluted shares;
    • shares delivered with a notice of guaranteed delivery are not deemed "owned" by the buyer until either their physical receipt or, in the case of uncertificated shares, an agent's message being received by the depository; and
    • "consummation" of the tender offer is defined as acceptance for payment, even though payment itself has yet to occur. This confirms that the second-step merger can proceed before payment, which in turn gives buyers ownership over the target company's underlying assets before making payment. Consequently, buyers relying on debt financing can use the Section 251(h) tender offer process without wondering how to pay for the shares before using the assets as collateral for a loan.

Other Amendments to the DGCL

Other amendments to the DGCL coming into effect on August 1, 2014, do the following:
  • Permit charter amendments without stockholder approval to change the corporate name or delete historical provisions relating to the corporation's incorporator, initial board of directors or initial subscribers for shares and provisions relating to previously effected changes to stock.
  • Clarify that directors and stockholders may escrow written consents, to be effective no later than 60 days after the date of the consent, even if the person is not a director or stockholder at the time of signing, as long as the person is a director or stockholder, as applicable, as of the relevant record date. The amendment adds that the consents are revocable unless otherwise provided. This amendment is particularly helpful in an acquisition context when establishing shell entities that will participate in a future merger. The statute now explicitly authorizes the signing of consents by directors and stockholders before the signers actually hold those positions.
  • Permit a voting trust agreement, or any amendment to that agreement, to be delivered to the principal place of business of the corporation instead of its registered office.
  • Amend Sections 103(a)(1) and 108(d) to account for an incorporator's unavailability.
For the full text of these amendments, see DGCL Amendments.

LLC and DRULPA Amendments

The amendments to the LLC Act and DRULPA, effective August 1, 2014, will:
  • Add new sections that require:
    • an LLC to maintain a current record of the name and last known business, residence or mailing address of each member or manager; and
    • a limited partnership to maintain a current record of the name and last known business, residence or mailing address of each partner.
  • Confirm that a member or limited partner of an LLC or limited partnership may make a books and records request in person or by an attorney or other agent.
  • Require the LLC or the limited partnership to provide its communication contact, upon a written request, with the name, business address and business telephone number of a natural person who has access to the record now required to be maintained.
  • Clarify that a person who is not yet a limited or general partner of a partnership or member of an LLC may, unless prohibited by the partnership or LLC agreement, consent to any matter as long as the consent is effective only after the person is a limited or general partner, member or manager. Notably, these amendments do not contain the 60-day limit of the comparable amendment to the DGCL, nor do they contain any statement regarding the revocability of the consents.
  • Modify and provide additional means for an LLC to revoke dissolution. If the LLC agreement describes how to revoke dissolution, then that method governs, including if revocation were otherwise prohibited by default under the statute. However, if the LLC agreement is silent on revocation, then:
    • if an event of dissolution occurred under the LLC agreement, a vote to revoke dissolution that is equivalent to the vote that would be needed to amend the LLC agreement is required;
    • if dissolution occurred because the members voted to dissolve, those members must vote to revoke dissolution; and
    • if dissolution occurred because the last remaining member of the LLC is no longer a member, then the personal representative of that member or the assignee of all the LLC membership interests can vote to revoke the dissolution, but must also agree in writing to the admission of a nominee or designee as a member.
  • Modify and provide additional means for a limited partnership to revoke dissolution. If the partnership agreement describes how to revoke dissolution, then that method governs, including if revocation were otherwise prohibited by default under the statute. However, if the partnership agreement is silent on revocation, then:
    • if an event of dissolution occurred under the partnership agreement, a vote to revoke dissolution that is equivalent to the vote that would be needed to amend the partnership agreement is required;
    • if dissolution occurred because the partners voted to dissolve, those partners must vote to revoke dissolution; and
    • if dissolution occurred because the general partner withdrew or the last remaining limited partner is no longer a limited partner, then the dissolution may be revoked by an affirmative vote of all remaining general partners and limited partners, or personal representative of the last remaining limited partner.
For the full text of these amendments, see LLC Amendments and DRULPA Amendments.

DRUPA Amendments

On July 15, 2014, the governor of Delaware also signed into law two amendments to the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act, effective August 1, 2014. The amendments confirm that:
  • A partner may make a books and records request in person or by an attorney or other agent.
  • A person who is not yet a partner of a partnership may, unless otherwise provided in a partnership agreement, consent to any matter as a partner as long as the consent will only be effective when the person is actually a partner of the partnership.
For the full text of these amendments, see DRUPA Amendments.