No valid amendment to scheme rules (or estoppel) to close Barber window

In Trustee Solutions and others v Dubery and another [2006] EWHC 1426 (Ch) (21 June 2006), the High Court held that documents issued by the principal employer of a final salary pension scheme, that purported to increase the normal retirement age for female members to 65, did not amount to a valid amendment of the scheme's rules. It was necessary for a document amending the rules to be signed by the trustees and employer, and the documents in question were not. There was also no effective estoppel created, as the evidence did not bear out the view that a common understanding arose that there was a normal retirement age of 65 for female members.
PLC Pensions


The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area

Log in using Practical Law username

Only use this login if you have not set up OnePass for Practical Law

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247246870651", "objName" : "No valid amendment to scheme rules (or estoppel) to close Barber", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "23eeb4667:157ffde6601:65ca", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "23eeb4667:157ffde6601:65cb", "statisticSensorPath" : "" }