Territorial jurisdiction

In Anderson v Stena Drilling PTE Limited, the EAT considered the territorial jurisdiction tests established by the House of Lords in Lawson v Serco for the first time. The Scottish claimant, who worked on an oil rig in far eastern waters and was employed by a company registered in Singapore, unsuccessfully argued that he had the protection of the unfair dismissal provisions in the Employment Rights Act 1996 on the basis that he was a peripatetic or an expatriate employee (the second and third category of employee in Lawson v Serco). The EAT upheld the tribunal's finding that it had no jurisdiction to hear his unfair dismissal claim.

PLC Employment


The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area

Log in using Practical Law username

Only use this login if you have not set up OnePass for Practical Law

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247247799895", "objName" : "Territorial jurisdiction", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://us.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/us/resource/4-204-0484?source=relatedcontent", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "2-237a01f7:15a5bcc5090:-3553", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "2-237a01f7:15a5bcc5090:-3552", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }