Interplay of substantive and curial law in international arbitration | Practical Law

Interplay of substantive and curial law in international arbitration | Practical Law

Note: This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 5 December 2007 (see Legal update, Law of seat determines scope of permissible challenges to arbitral award).

Interplay of substantive and curial law in international arbitration

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 4-371-2028 (Approx. 7 pages)

Interplay of substantive and curial law in international arbitration

by PLC Dispute Resolution
Published on 03 Jul 2007England, International, Wales
Note: This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 5 December 2007 (see Legal update, Law of seat determines scope of permissible challenges to arbitral award).
In C v D [2007] EWHC 1541 (Comm), the claimants sought injunctive relief restraining the pursuit of legal proceedings in New York in which the defendant had sought to challenge a London arbitration award.
Granting the injunction, the court held that the fact the underlying contract was governed by New York law did not entitle the defendant to bring proceedings in the New York courts. The arbitration agreement was governed by English law, and the lex curiae was English. In those circumstances, the English court could and should intervene so as to prevent the claimant's rights being infringed by the New York proceedings. The judgment of Mr Justice Cooke considers, in particular, the relevance and interplay of substantive and curial laws in arbitral proceedings.