Latest discussions regarding revisions to UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules | Practical Law

Latest discussions regarding revisions to UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules | Practical Law

An update on discussions regarding proposed revisions to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.

Latest discussions regarding revisions to UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

Practical Law Legal Update 4-501-5424 (Approx. 3 pages)

Latest discussions regarding revisions to UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

by PLC Arbitration
Law stated as at 24 Feb 2010International
An update on discussions regarding proposed revisions to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
The 52nd session of the UNCITRAL Working Group II (Arbitration) took place in New York between 1 and 5 February 2010. (For reports on previous sessions, see Legal updates, Revisions to UNCITRAL arbitration rules and 50th session on the revisions to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules.)
In this session, the Working Group completed its second reading of the draft revised rules and then commenced its third reading. Many of the draft articles discussed were approved without any change. Others were approved following modification, including:
  • Draft Article 4, which was amended to provide that, where the respondent included, in its response to the notice of arbitration, claims against a party other than the claimant, its response would include a notice of arbitration in respect of that third party. Draft Article 17(5) introduces a provision enabling the tribunal to join a party to the arbitration, provided they are a party to the arbitration agreement. However, such joinder could only occur after the tribunal had been constituted. The amendment to draft Article 4 means that a respondent could, in its response to the notice of arbitration, formulate a claim against a party other than the claimant, rather than waiting until formal joinder at a later stage. This also allows the respondent to avoid having to serve a separate notice of arbitration.
  • Draft Article 26 (interim measures), which was amended to provide that a party requesting an interim measure may be liable for any costs and damages caused by the measure to any party if the tribunal later decides, based on the circumstances at that time, that the measure should not have been granted.
The latest draft revised rules are to be considered by UNCITRAL at its 43rd session, which is scheduled to be held in New York from 21 June to 9 July 2010. We will continue to monitor developments.
The Working Group's draft report is published on the Working Group II page on UNCITRAL's website.
Source: UNCITRAL