Schnader: NY Appellate Court Clarifies Plaintiff's Burden Under the NYC Human Rights Law | Practical Law

Schnader: NY Appellate Court Clarifies Plaintiff's Burden Under the NYC Human Rights Law | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP discusses the New York Appellate Division, First Department's decision in Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center, affirming the dismissal of the plaintiff physician's age discrimination and retaliation claims against a hospital under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL). The discussion makes it clear that despite the broad protections of the NYCHRL, a discrimination claim will not survive summary judgment if the plaintiff does not present concrete evidence that the adverse action was motivated, at least in part, by discriminatory or retaliatory animus.

Schnader: NY Appellate Court Clarifies Plaintiff's Burden Under the NYC Human Rights Law

by Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
Published on 18 Jul 2012New York, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP discusses the New York Appellate Division, First Department's decision in Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center, affirming the dismissal of the plaintiff physician's age discrimination and retaliation claims against a hospital under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL). The discussion makes it clear that despite the broad protections of the NYCHRL, a discrimination claim will not survive summary judgment if the plaintiff does not present concrete evidence that the adverse action was motivated, at least in part, by discriminatory or retaliatory animus.