Expert Q&A on Employee Benefits After the Supreme Court's Ruling that DOMA is Unconstitutional | Practical Law

Expert Q&A on Employee Benefits After the Supreme Court's Ruling that DOMA is Unconstitutional | Practical Law

An Expert Q&A with Howard Bye-Torre of Stoel Rives LLP on the recent US Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Windsor that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage for federal law purposes to mean opposite-sex marriage, is unconstitutional. The Q&A addresses the decision's impact for employers that sponsor health and retirement plans.

Expert Q&A on Employee Benefits After the Supreme Court's Ruling that DOMA is Unconstitutional

by Practical Law Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Published on 09 Jul 2013 • USA (National/Federal)
An Expert Q&A with Howard Bye-Torre of Stoel Rives LLP on the recent US Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Windsor that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage for federal law purposes to mean opposite-sex marriage, is unconstitutional. The Q&A addresses the decision's impact for employers that sponsor health and retirement plans.