N.D. Cal.: Evidence Preclusion Sanction Appropriate Punishment for Untimely, Deficient Discovery Response | Practical Law

N.D. Cal.: Evidence Preclusion Sanction Appropriate Punishment for Untimely, Deficient Discovery Response | Practical Law

In a November 21, 2013 opinion in Sarytchev v. Korolev, the US District Court for the Northern District of California struck the defendants' answer and imposed an evidence preclusion sanction as punishment for providing untimely and inadequate discovery.

N.D. Cal.: Evidence Preclusion Sanction Appropriate Punishment for Untimely, Deficient Discovery Response

by Practical Law Litigation
Published on 30 Jun 2014 • USA (National/Federal)
In a November 21, 2013 opinion in Sarytchev v. Korolev, the US District Court for the Northern District of California struck the defendants' answer and imposed an evidence preclusion sanction as punishment for providing untimely and inadequate discovery.