Reasoning of arbitral awards: a delicate balance (Swiss Supreme Court) | Practical Law

Reasoning of arbitral awards: a delicate balance (Swiss Supreme Court) | Practical Law

In decision 4A_446/2013, the Swiss Supreme Court considered an application to set aside an award where the petitioner argued that its right to be heard had been violated.

Reasoning of arbitral awards: a delicate balance (Swiss Supreme Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 4-565-5228 (Approx. 5 pages)

Reasoning of arbitral awards: a delicate balance (Swiss Supreme Court)

by PD Dr Nathalie Voser (Partner, Zurich) and Julie Raneda (Senior Associate, Geneva), Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Published on 22 Apr 2014 • Switzerland
In decision 4A_446/2013, the Swiss Supreme Court considered an application to set aside an award where the petitioner argued that its right to be heard had been violated.