No analogy with Part 36 when considering effect of Calderbank offer under costs discretion in CPR 44.2 (Court of Appeal) | Practical Law

No analogy with Part 36 when considering effect of Calderbank offer under costs discretion in CPR 44.2 (Court of Appeal) | Practical Law

In Coward v Phaestos and others [2014] EWCA Civ 1256, the Court of Appeal considered a costs appeal by the unsuccessful claimant, primarily on the basis that the judge below had failed to take proper account of a Calderbank offer that he had made.

No analogy with Part 36 when considering effect of Calderbank offer under costs discretion in CPR 44.2 (Court of Appeal)

by Practical Law Dispute Resolution
Published on 08 Oct 2014 • England, Wales
In Coward v Phaestos and others [2014] EWCA Civ 1256, the Court of Appeal considered a costs appeal by the unsuccessful claimant, primarily on the basis that the judge below had failed to take proper account of a Calderbank offer that he had made.