British Airways plc v Starmer EAT/0306/05/SM | Practical Law

British Airways plc v Starmer EAT/0306/05/SM | Practical Law

In Starmer v British Airways, the EAT upheld a tribunal's finding that BA's decision to require a female employee to work 75% of her full-time hours following her request to reduce her hours to 50% was indirectly discriminatory under section 1(2)(b) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, since it was a provision, criterion or practice that had a disparate impact on women and was not justified.

British Airways plc v Starmer EAT/0306/05/SM

Practical Law Resource ID 5-364-7004 (Approx. 2 pages)

British Airways plc v Starmer EAT/0306/05/SM

by PLC Employment
Published on 21 Jul 2005England, Scotland, Wales
In Starmer v British Airways, the EAT upheld a tribunal's finding that BA's decision to require a female employee to work 75% of her full-time hours following her request to reduce her hours to 50% was indirectly discriminatory under section 1(2)(b) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, since it was a provision, criterion or practice that had a disparate impact on women and was not justified.