Commercial real estate in United States: overview
A Q&A guide to corporate real estate law in the United States.
The Q&A gives a high level overview of the corporate real estate market; real estate investment structures, including REITs; title; tenure; sale of real estate; seller's liability; due diligence; warranties; real estate tax, including VAT and stamp duty/transfer tax; climate change targets; restrictions on foreign ownership or occupation; real estate finance; leases; planning law and consents; and proposals for reform.
To compare answers across multiple jurisdictions, visit the Corporate Real Estate Country Q&A tool.
This Q&A is part of the global guide to corporate real estate law. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit www.practicallaw.com/realestate-mjg.
The corporate real estate market
The US commercial real estate market is thriving thanks to low interest rates and increased debt and equity capital availability. The commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market continues to grow at a robust pace. At the close of the first half of 2015, over US$54.5 billion in CMBS had been issued in the US, compared to US$43.8 billion and US$40.8 billion for the same periods in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Foreign investment continues to surge upward, accounting for US$39.2 billion in US commercial real estate investment in the first half of 2015, compared to US$19.5 billion for the same period in 2014. The market for office property has performed impressively over the past year, and has seen 21 consecutive quarters of lower or flat vacancy rates since the end of the recession, reaching the lowest rate since the third quarter of 2008. According to NAREIT's October 2015 study, real estate investment trusts (REITs) experienced a slow start and some volatility after 2014's standout performance due to concerns over rising interest rates, but have outpaced the broader stock market in recent months (www.reit.com/news/videos/quick-study-reits-outpace-broader-market-september; see also PREA Compendium of Statistics – 6 October, 2015, www.prea.org/research/compendium).
Recent significant deals include:
In January 2015, the Quebec government purchased 1095 Sixth Avenue, a 42-storey office tower in New York City, from Blackstone Group LP for US$2.2 billion.
In April 2015, General Growth Properties, Inc. and Jeff Sutton purchased the Crown Building, a 26-storey retail and office property at 57th Street and 5th Avenue in New York City for US$1.775 billion.
In May 2015, SL Green Realty purchased 11 Madison Avenue, a 29-storey property for US$2.29 billion from Sapir Organization and CIM Group, in the second largest sale ever of a single building in Manhattan.
In June 2015, Blackstone Group LP agreed to purchase Willis Tower in Chicago, the 110-storey office building commonly known as Sears Tower, for US$1.3 billion.
In October 2015, Blackstone Group LP agreed to lead the purchase of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village, an 11,000-apartment complex in New York City, for US$5.3 billion.
Real estate investment
It is possible to acquire US commercial real estate in an individual capacity, but the resulting personal liability is usually considered undesirable. It is typical for a prospective buyer to form a corporation, partnership or limited liability company as an acquisition vehicle. The following factors should be considered when choosing the type of entity:
Personal liability of investors.
The transferability of ownership interests.
However, no structure can shelter an investor from potential personal liability for certain acts, including fraud or torts.
Federal and state income tax regimes should be considered when evaluating an acquisition structure. Non-US investors often structure their investment to minimise the impact of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA), which applies to certain disposals by non-US persons of interests in US real estate. In addition, non-US investors should consider the applicability of any income tax treaty between the US and the home country that may minimise or eliminate the US federal income tax burden.
REITs are available and often used in the US. A REIT is not generally taxed on its net income and gains to the extent that it distributes the requisite income and gains to its shareholders. This tax advantage is offset by certain requirements that a REIT must fulfil in relation to its structure, assets and income. REITs are frequently used by foreign investors in the US markets as a tax efficient structuring strategy.
The EB-5 visa program for non-US investors was created by the Immigration Act of 1990. It provides approved non-US investors (and their families) with a US Permanent Resident Card in exchange for investing money in job-creating real estate development projects. Increasingly, many real estate developers have turned to it as an attractive source of relatively inexpensive financing.
Common financing structures include:
Mortgage loan financing (debt secured by a lien on commercial real estate).
Mezzanine loan financing (debt secured by a pledge of equity in the CRE-owning entity).
The issuance of preferred equity.
A combination of these structures (see Question 24).
One goal in selecting a financing structure is to reduce the actual taxable income of the investment vehicle in the US. For this purpose, it is important to ensure that the payments of interest are deductible for US federal income tax purposes, as some rules may limit this deductibility.
Investors in US commercial real estate can be divided into two categories, institutional investors and private investors.
Institutional investors, who often invest through joint venture arrangements or REIT structures with private investors and real estate companies, typically include:
Life insurance companies.
Private investors include:
High net-worth individuals and funds controlled by them.
Real estate developers.
Foreign investors (including sovereign wealth funds).
Private equity funds.
Foreign investment in US real estate is generally welcomed and encouraged, although the tax implications of it are under continual review (see Question 43) and vary depending on the jurisdiction of the investor.
Restrictions on foreign ownership or occupation
There are few restrictions on foreign nationals and entities limiting the ownership, purchase or transfer of real estate, except where the federal government has determined that national security may be at stake or protection of agricultural and natural resources is required. Various federal statutes contain disclosure and filing requirements applicable to foreign investors in US real estate. In addition, a non-US investor may be subject to the rules under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA) (see Question 2).
Depending on the nature of the asset being acquired, or the economic size of the transaction, certain legal pre-clearances may be necessary. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976, an anti-trust regulation, requires any investor seeking to acquire a stake valued at more than US$76.3 million in a particular security, or where one party to the transaction has US$152.5 million or more in annual sales and the other has US$15.3 million (in each case as of 2015, with figures indexed yearly to the percentage change in the gross national product), to file a notification with the federal government. Obtaining deal-specific legal advice on the effect of these statutes is important.
Title to real estate
Real estate is comprised of land, the improvements (buildings) constructed on the land, and the fixtures attached to the land or buildings. If these three elements of a parcel of real estate are owned by the same entity, they are conveyed together in one deed that is recorded in a single land registry office. Long-term leasehold interests are also considered real estate, and the leases creating them can be recorded in the land records.
Title to real estate is evidenced by a deed or other transfer document, which is recorded in the county or municipal land records. The Torrens land registration system, which differs from traditional US recording systems in that it establishes a legal procedure whereby the state guarantees the owner's title, has been implemented to a limited extent in certain US jurisdictions (including Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Ohio). The name of the public register of title (land records office), the authorities responsible for managing it, and the availability of electronic access and electronic conveyancing, varies by county and municipality.
The following are recorded in the public register of title:
Other documents that affect title to the commercial real estate.
Confidential information or documents cannot generally be protected from disclosure once recorded in the land records. However, confidential documents can in some cases be redacted prior to recording. It is also sometimes possible to protect the identity of an investor by creating a holding company to acquire title to real estate.
Except in the few US jurisdictions using the Torrens land registration system or equivalent (see Question 6), there is no state guarantee of title and the authority that manages the public register is not liable to pay compensation for errors made in relation to title registration. Title insurance is available from private insurers and widely obtained by buyers and lenders.
Sale of real estate
A real estate broker, typically acting as the seller's agent, lists properties through brokerage networks. For substantial transactions, the seller's broker may publicise an offering package and invite bids from prospective buyers. Sellers typically engage their brokers through brokerage agreements, which may include exclusivity provisions and generally bind the seller to pay a commission to the broker in the event of a completed sale. These agreements are legally binding.
If the seller decides to conduct an auction, the bid process typically includes a first round where the prospective buyer submits a detailed written bid package, including a description of the economic terms of the offer, the sources of the buyer's funds, the buyer's market experience and other details. The seller will usually select certain bidders to participate in a second round of bids. In response, a bidder typically submits its "best and final" offer, written responses to the seller's questions and commercial and legal comments on the seller's form of sale contract. After the second round of bids, a buyer is usually selected.
A letter of intent (LOI) for the acquisition can be finalised when an offer is accepted. However, it is also common to move directly to definitive contract documentation. The LOI can, at a minimum, set out the basic understanding of the parties and a confidentiality provision, or may be more comprehensive and cover some or all of the material issues in the transaction. The LOI usually states that it is non-binding until the parties enter into a definitive sale contract. Unlike certain other jurisdictions, a US seller can cease negotiations before execution of the sale contract, even though the buyer may have already incurred due diligence costs and legal fees. In such case, if the LOI required the parties to negotiate in good faith, the buyer may try to claim that the seller is liable for acting in bad faith in terminating negotiations.
The sale contract is generally drafted by the seller's lawyers, and typically includes:
A legal description of the real property.
The purchase price, contract deposit, and circumstances under which the deposit (or a portion of it) may be refundable to the buyer.
A description of any included fixtures, personal property service contracts, leases, employee obligations and other material items.
The timing of fulfilment of any conditions precedent, the date of the closing (including any postponement rights) and a list of closing deliverables.
Any due diligence, financing or casualty contingencies.
A section regulating the seller's obligations until the closing date.
Warranties and a provision regulating the consequences of any inaccuracies.
A section regulating monetary adjustments (pro-rations) to be made at the closing and an apportionment of closing costs.
Subject to any contingencies, a purchase contract becomes legally binding on execution by the parties and delivery to the seller of any consideration required on execution.
In a sale of a company that owns real estate, the share purchase contract will also typically include negotiated warranties and covenants covering real estate-related matters. See Question 13.
The major substantive areas of due diligence include review of:
The public records through a title insurance commitment.
A land survey.
Environmental reports and database searches.
Leases and tenant estoppel certificates.
Engineering and property condition reports.
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) searches.
Building and zoning code violation searches.
The above materials are typically provided by third-party specialists or search firms. The buyer's lawyer is typically involved in review, except for engineering and property condition reports, which are generally examined by the buyer or an independent engineering consultant. Aspects of review are sometimes outsourced to specialists (for example, zoning).
In the commercial real estate market today, market standard is for sale contracts to not include extensive warranties, and property is instead sold "as is", with minimal representations and warranties. Nonetheless, where the purchaser has bargaining power, some sale contracts do include heavily negotiated warranties. Sellers seek to limit warranties in areas where the buyer can conduct its own investigations, or qualify them to seller's actual knowledge. Buyers seek to include seller warranties where the results of due diligence are not conclusive, or where due diligence cannot provide the necessary level of comfort. Seller warranties may include that the:
Seller owns the property and has the requisite power and authority to sell.
Property does not violate any law or regulation, and does not, to the knowledge of the seller, contain environmental contamination, or, at a minimum, that the seller has not received any notice of the same.
Property is not subject to any third party claims, litigation or eminent domain proceedings, or, at a minimum, that the seller has not received any notice of the same (see Question 39).
Certain federal and state laws (generally applicable to residential transactions) require disclosure of the presence of lead paint or other known environmental hazards, and/or the provision of a property condition report to the buyer. Contractual liability depends on the scope of warranties given by the seller (see Question 13) and the negotiated remedy for breach.
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and its state counterparts impose strict liability for environmental remediation on the present owner of a property. Other persons may share in that liability, such as prior owners or operators of the property. Buyers can avoid strict liability for pre-existing conditions under CERCLA and some state statutes if they perform all appropriate inquiry into the property's environmental condition before purchase. The standard for all appropriate inquiry is contained in the US Environmental Protection Agency's All Appropriate Inquiry Rule (AAIR). The AAIR prescribes protocols for the pre-acquisition performance of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. New owners who comply with the AAIR are protected from liability as "bona fide prospective purchasers", but that protection can be lost if the new owner exacerbates the pre-existing conditions or otherwise fails to exercise "due care" in its stewardship of the property. Buyers typically seek to limit their exposure to ongoing environmental liability through the negotiation of warranties in the sale contract, while sellers typically seek to limit such warranties to matters of which they have knowledge or that they caused. Buyers frequently purchase environmental insurance to further manage risk associated with unknown pre-existing conditions.
A real estate buyer is generally not liable for events occurring before its period of ownership. However, a buyer can potentially inherit liability for pre-existing environmental contamination under federal, state and local laws. A buyer may also inherit certain obligations under existing leases of space in an income-producing property. A seller may retain liability as a statutory obligation, or as a matter of contract between the parties. Contractual warranties concerning the property's condition usually survive the closing, though increasingly a seller's liability is negotiated to extend only for a defined number of months thereafter and/or up to a specified monetary amount.
The completion of the sale of commercial real estate occurs at a "closing", either in person at the offices of seller's or purchaser's attorneys or the office of an escrowee (typically a title insurance company), or via the e-mail exchange of electronic documents and wired funds (sometimes with originals to be subsequently exchanged).
A deed is generally recorded in the land records immediately after the payment of the purchase price to the seller, with title insurance protecting the buyer from any intervening liens or a competing deed. In some jurisdictions, particularly in western states, it is customary for the purchase price to be placed in an escrow account held by a title insurance or escrow company, with recording of the deed and issue of the buyer's title insurance policy occurring at the same time as the release of the purchase price from escrow.
Title to real estate transfers on delivery to the buyer of a written deed, the form of which varies by state and by contract. The recording of the deed in the land records is not a condition to the transfer's effectiveness. However, certain formalities, including notarisation, are required before the deed can be accepted for recording.
Buyer's costs generally include:
Mortgage recording tax. If the buyer finances the acquisition with a mortgage, mortgage recording tax is payable (at the time of recordation) in a number of jurisdictions. The tax is usually a percentage of the principal amount secured.
Title, financing and diligence fees. The buyer is generally responsible for payment of the:
title insurance premium (for its own policy and the lender's policy) and search fees;
cost of a land survey;
cost of any environmental, engineering or property inspection reports required by the buyer or its lender;
Legal fees. The buyer will pay its own and the lender's lawyer's fees.
Miscellaneous fees. Most jurisdictions impose a de minimis per-page fee for the recording of documents. Escrow fees are often split with the seller.
Seller's costs typically include:
Transfer taxes. Real estate transfer tax, imposed by many jurisdictions based on the purchase price of the property, is generally payable by the seller, although this can vary by statute, local custom or contract (see Question 18).
Legal fees. The seller will pay its own legal fees.
Miscellaneous fees. Brokerage commissions are generally paid by the seller.
Real estate tax
Many jurisdictions impose transfer tax based on the consideration paid for the property, typically including the purchase price and the face amount of indebtedness assumed by the purchaser. Some jurisdictions impose transfer tax on the creation of a long-term lease. Each state and local government sets its own rate of tax and tax basis. Statutory exemptions from transfer tax vary by jurisdiction. Transactions that are commonly exempt include conveyances:
Under the federal Bankruptcy Code.
To governmental agencies.
Of real estate without consideration.
That change identity or mere form of ownership with no change in beneficial ownership.
Some states impose a transfer tax on conveyances of a controlling interest in an entity that owns property located within the state. Each jurisdiction sets its own rate of tax.
Mortgage recording tax payable by a buyer may, in certain instances, be avoided by structuring, such as by having the mortgage secure a guarantee rather than a promissory note, or in a refinancing that involves assignment of existing debt to the new lender. Transfer taxes can in some jurisdictions be avoided by structuring a transfer of ownership interests in the entity owning the commercial real estate (see Question 18).
Commercial rent tax is imposed in certain municipalities, such as New York City, to be paid by the tenant under a lease of business premises. An exemption may apply if the tenant's annual rent falls under a specified threshold, or in particular municipal districts to encourage economic development. Certain states (for example, Florida) impose a sales tax on rents payable under commercial leases.
Climate change issues
Individual states have enacted a range of "green" or "stretch" building codes aimed at improving the energy efficiency of buildings and reducing their carbon emissions. Most of these codes are voluntary or employ tax incentives to foster compliance, but in some jurisdictions (for example, California) many energy efficiency provisions are mandatory for new commercial development. For significant real estate development projects under environmental impact review, some states now require an analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and opportunities to mitigate them.
Real estate finance
Secured lending involving real estate
The most common form of real estate security for financing is the mortgage or deed of trust. A mortgage grants a lien on the real property to the lender, which is released when the loan is repaid. A deed of trust transfers title to the encumbered real property to a trustee for the lender, who holds title until the loan is repaid. Whether a mortgage or a deed of trust is used depends on the applicable state's legal view of real estate security (lien-theory or title-theory). The practical difference for the borrower is negligible, since the primary difference between the two is in the manner of enforcement after default. Mortgages and deeds of trust are perfected by recording in the land records in the jurisdiction where the real property is located.
Lenders use a number of tools to protect against a default by the borrower.
Loan agreements will typically include certain conditions precedent that the borrower must meet prior to any funding of proceeds, such as providing borrower equity, delivering certain financial documents and certifications, and providing for acceptable loan guarantees.
Lenders also require borrowers to provide ongoing covenants as to certain critical matters. For example, lenders will often request that borrowers (and any guarantors) provide covenants as to satisfaction of certain financial ratios or tests. Lenders will also require borrowers to maintain the property, to grant lenders consent rights with respect to ongoing leasing activity, and to ensure maintenance of single-purpose entity status.
Guarantees and letters of credit
Lenders will often request a guarantee from a credit worthy party, typically with an interest in the borrower. Guarantees may be full payment guarantees, guarantees of non-recourse carveouts contained in the loan agreement (typically borrower defaults in the nature of bad faith acts), or guarantees of completion of work. Instead of a guarantee, lenders will in some transactions accept a letter of credit from a financial institution.
Other forms of lender protection
Lenders may also utilise any of the following methods to protect their interests:
Reserves. Lenders may require that portions of the loan proceeds are held back in the form of interest, capital improvement or other reserves, to be disbursed upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
Cash management. Lenders may include provisions that require the "sweeping" of property income into managed bank accounts.
Right of entry/management. Loan agreements typically give lenders the right to entry and management of property affairs during events of default by borrowers.
Lenders are protected from liability for contamination if they observe guidelines specified in federal and state law. Despite these statutory protections, lenders typically require borrowers and guarantors to deliver environmental indemnities at closing, whereby lenders are indemnified against environmental claims. Such indemnities typically survive full payment or termination of the loan.
Though the range of available remedies varies among jurisdictions, typical remedies for default include acceleration of the unpaid balance of the loan, foreclosure, taking possession of the property to complete a construction project, and offsetting any borrower account balances against unpaid loan obligations. Typically, loan agreements will provide that lenders' remedies upon borrower default are cumulative; lenders may select which remedy or remedies they would like to pursue. In the event of borrower insolvency, the intent of the remedies is to give the lender recourse through direct access to the collateral. In the alternative, lender recourse to creditworthy entities is typically provided through guarantees (see Question 25).
The primary concerns for lenders in construction and development projects relate to insuring the completion of such projects, avoidance of construction-related liabilities, and the risk that permanent "take-out" financing may not be obtained. Such loans are typically structured such that funding occurs in increments, each contingent upon satisfaction of certain work-related and other conditions. Funding of final proceeds upon project completion will often require that borrowers deliver final lien waivers from contractors and certificates of occupancy from local municipalities. Lenders will also typically require a guarantee of completion from a credit-worthy affiliate of the borrower (see Question 25) and a borrower indemnity.
Other real estate financing techniques
Real estate securitisation is a common and attractive finance technique in the US (see Question 1).
Sale and leaseback transactions are sometime used by corporate property owners as an alternative to loan financing.
Real estate leases
Negotiation and execution of leases
It is essential to the validity of a lease that:
The landlord and tenant are separate parties.
The landlord holds the title to the leased property.
Any necessary third party consents are obtained, and if executed by an agent, the agent has the appropriate authority to execute the lease on the landlord's behalf.
The formalities of lease execution vary by type of entity and across states, but generally, notarisation and/or recordation in the land records is not required (except in the case of certain long-term leases and ground leases where recordation is desired by the tenant). In some states, leases are executed as a deed.
Rent levels are set contractually within the lease. Rent increases are typically specified either as a percentage increase or, less frequently, are based on a referenced index of inflation (such as the Consumer Price Index of the US Department of Labour). Rent levels and increases thereto are not controlled by statute (other than in the case of certain residential leases). When a lease includes an extension right, the extension term rent is often reset at a fair market rental value, determined by appraisal.
VAT is not payable on rent, but certain jurisdictions (see Question 21) impose a tax on rents in certain circumstances.
Rent security deposits are often required in commercial leases as a matter of contract, but are not required by law. Certain jurisdictions legislate the type of account in which rent security deposits under residential leases may be held and impose reporting obligations on the landlord with respect thereto.
Length of term and security of occupation
Commercial occupancy arrangements are typically set out in a lease. There are many types of lease in use in the US, and the typical length of the lease term will vary with the type of lease and will also be dictated by the economics of the transaction. Common types of commercial leases include:
Triple net leases, where in addition to rent, the tenant pays for all real estate taxes, insurance and operating expenses.
Gross leases, where the tenant pays rent and the landlord pays the above expenses (although in a modified version, the tenant may pay its share of increases in those expenses over a specified base year).
Ground leases, often net leases of land to be developed by the tenant.
Gross leases generally bear shorter terms than net leases, and may run from two years to 15 years, although five- and ten-year terms are common. Ground leases may have terms running from 25 years up to 99 years and longer.
The tenant's right to renew a commercial lease at the end of the term is a matter of contract. Some jurisdictions provide that if the landlord accepts rent from the tenant after expiration of the lease term, a month-to-month tenancy or tenancy at will is created, which gives the tenant certain legal rights despite the expiry of the lease term.
Tenants are typically restricted from assigning or subletting, subject to obtaining landlord's consent. Some state laws require that any consent is subject to the landlord's reasonable discretion (although this protection is more typical in residential leases). Sharing of leased premises with the tenant's affiliated company generally requires landlord consent, although some leases provide that a certain amount of square footage may be occupied by the tenant's affiliated company. Subleases or assignments to affiliated companies may be expressly permitted, sometimes with specified conditions. Restrictions on lease assignment can include restrictions on the legal reorganisation or change of control of a corporate entity. Tenants may be able to negotiate some flexibility concerning this restriction, such as by providing a replacement guarantor meeting certain specified tests.
Most commercial leases will provide that an assigning tenant retains liability for performance of all lease obligations even after the lease is assigned, although occasionally, a tenant with strong bargaining power may negotiate a release. A landlord selling its property will typically assign its interest as landlord under all leases to the buyer. Whether the selling party retains liability for obligations under the lease arising prior to the date of sale is a question of contract.
Repair and insurance
Landlords are usually responsible for structural and roof repairs and repairs to any building systems. Tenants are generally responsible for non-structural repairs within the leased premises, and repairs of any damage caused by tenant. Commercial leases often provide that lease improvements made by a tenant that are affixed to the real estate become the landlord's property either upon installation or upon the termination of the lease.
Landlord's remedies and termination
Landlord remedies for breach of lease vary by contract and by jurisdiction. Certain state laws provide for expedited recovery of possession of the premises by the landlord after an event of default. Typical lease provisions entitle a commercial landlord to bring an action for damages, including delinquent rent and the cost to relet the premises. Landlords also typically reserve in the lease the right to accelerate the rents, so that the landlord can recover a judgment for the present value of future rents under the lease. In instances where a tenant remains in possession after termination of a lease, landlords are often entitled by contract to recover rent at a penalty rate.
The grounds on which a landlord can terminate a lease, and the notice and other procedures that apply, are a matter of contract. These typically include:
The tenant's failure to pay rent and other amounts when due.
Breach by the tenant of its lease obligations (often after a stated notice and cure period).
The bankruptcy or insolvency of the tenant or a lease guarantor (but note that the federal Bankruptcy Code prevents the landlord from exercising remedies directly against the tenant during a certain period).
In certain cases (particularly retail leases), abandonment of the leased premises.
Commercial tenants may sometimes negotiate a right to a rent abatement, or even a termination right, if the premises suffer serious damage that is not repaired within a specified period of time. Generally, however, tenants do not have a right to withhold rent. Tenant termination rights are strictly limited, although a lease sometimes may provide that the tenant can terminate if critical lease services are not delivered for a specified period or if the landlord fails to deliver the leased premises to the tenant by a specified date.
Planning and development controls
Local zoning regulations dictate the permitted use of a property. The type of property (for example, office building, shopping centre or multi-use building) and relevant zoning laws can be used to determine the best use of the property. Variances to local zoning regulations may sometimes be obtained, with some effort. In certain municipalities, historic buildings are regulated, requiring consent of landmarks or similar historic preservation boards to modify their appearance or demolish them.
Local zoning laws typically dictate:
As of right uses (uses permitted without consent of a local authority).
Uses that require consent (or a zoning variance) from a local authority.
Building permits are typically required for most types of construction, and a completed project must obtain a certificate of occupancy before it can operate for its intended use.
Typically, local or regional planning and zoning boards grant initial consents. The length of the decision-making process varies by locality and depends on the complexity of the development, the number of entities involved in the review, and whether objections are made by third parties. Time frames are often extended upon request of the applicant to obtain additional support.
The US Congress is contemplating changes to the tax code that would limit or repeal the deferral of capital gains taxes for like-kind exchanges (known as Section 1031 Exchanges). Also under consideration are changes to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA) (see Question 2), which imposes tax liability on sales of real estate by foreign investors, whereby the sale of real estate investment trust (REIT) shares by foreign investors would not be subject to FIRPTA and the threshold whereby foreign investors may own shares in publicly-traded companies without triggering FIRPTA liability would increase from 5% to 10%. Congress is also considering extending or making permanent the EB-5 visa program (see Question 2). Current proposals would increase the program's transparency, oversight and fraud prevention measures. Commentators believe that FIRPTA proposals have the most bipartisan support of the three areas of reform, although it is considered unlikely that any of these proposals will be enacted into law in 2015.
Internal Revenue Service
Description. Official, up-to-date Internal Revenue Service's Manual containing the text of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA).
US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Description. Official, up-to-date US Citizenship and Immigration Services website, containing background and guidance on the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.
Cornell University Law School
Description. Unofficial, up-to-date Cornell University Law School website containing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
US Environmental Protection Agency
Description. Official, up-to-date US Environmental Protection Agency website, containing background on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and a link to the text of the law.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Description. Official, up-to-date US Environmental Protection Agency website containing the text of and background on the All Appropriate Inquiry Rule (AAIR).
US House of Representatives
Description. Official, up-to-date US Government Printing Office website containing the text of the US Bankruptcy Code.
Federal Trade Commission
Description. Official, up-to-date Federal Trade Commission website containing the text of and background on the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976.
US Department of Treasury
Description. Official text of the Obama Administration's explanation of its FY2016 Proposed Budget, including its proposal to limit the deferral of gain for Section 1031 Exchanges to US$1 million per taxpayer, per year (page 110 to 111).
United States Congress
Description. Official text of Tax Reform Act of 2014 Discussion Draft, which would repeal Section 1031 Exchanges (Feb. 21, 2014) (Expired).
Description. Official, up-to-date US Congress website containing the text of and background on proposed S.915, the Real Estate Investment and Jobs Act of 2015, which would reform FIRPTA.
Description. Official, up-to-date US Congress website containing the text of and background on proposed H.R.2128, the Real Estate Investment and Jobs Act of 2015, which would reform FIRPTA.
Description. Official, up-to-date US Congress website containing the text of and background on proposed S.1501, the American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act of 2015, which would extend and reform the EB-5 program.
Description. Official, up-to-date US Congress website containing the text of and background on proposed S.2122, the Invest in Our Communities Act, which would make permanent and reform the EB-5 program.
Description. Official, up-to-date US Congress website containing the text of and background on proposed S.2115, the Targeted Employment Areas Improvement Act, which would reform the definition of Targeted Employment Areas under the EB-5 program.
David C Djaha, Partner and Global Practice Leader
Ropes & Gray LLP
Professional qualifications. New York, US, 1989
Areas of practice. Real estate; commercial finance; capital markets and joint ventures.
Representing a global private equity fund in the purchase of distressed loan portfolios valued in excess of US$2.5 billion.
Representing a global hedge fund in a joint venture with a New York developer and the US$600 million acquisition and financing of a NYC multi-tower condominium development site.
Representing a major Middle East-based investor in all its acquisitions, joint ventures and financings throughout the US.
Representing an international financial conglomerate in their real estate and private equity investment in the US, Asia and in Europe.
Laurie C Nelson, Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP
Professional qualifications. New York, US, 1983
Areas of practice. Real estate transactions and finance; commercial leasing.
Representing a group of publicly traded REITs in a series of acquisitions of trophy office and retail properties across the US.
Representing a major hospitality group in securitised financings of properties in New York and Florida.
Representing a national financial institution in major regional headquarters lease and data centres throughout the northeast US.
Representing a California-based private equity firm in a series of acquisitions of individual and pooled non-performing loans.
Matthew Stoller, Associate
Ropes & Gray LLP
Professional qualifications. New York, US, 2012
Areas of practice. Real estate transactions.
Represents Harvard Management Company in acquisitions and dispositions, development, and financings of various real estate assets, including timber and natural resource assets.
Represented a Fortune 1000 company in negotiation of nearly 300,000 sq. ft., US$260 million new headquarters lease at major Midtown location in New York City.
Represented a syndicate of lenders in connection with a US$1.5 billion loan to a major publicly-traded REIT focusing on ownership and operation of shopping malls, secured by numerous mortgages throughout the US.
Represented a sovereign wealth fund in the purchase of a US$52 million dollar luxury shopping centre in Southern California and subsequent US$32 million dollar financing thereof.
Ropes & Gray LLP
Professional qualifications. New York, US, 2015
Areas of practice. Real estate transactions.
Representing a publicly traded real estate investment trust as part of the acquisition and financing of a US$4 billion loan portfolio secured by real estate in the US and Europe.
Representing a publicly traded real estate investment trust in financing various commercial mortgage loans secured by real estate in the US and UK.