Unusual and "badly-worded" GMP clause reviewed | Practical Law

Unusual and "badly-worded" GMP clause reviewed | Practical Law

In AMEC Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Defence [2013] EWHC 110 (TCC), Coulson J in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) rejected a challenge against a dispute review board's (DRB) award concerning the meaning of a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) clause. The DRB was constituted as an arbitration and the board's award was appealed under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Unusual and "badly-worded" GMP clause reviewed

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 5-524-0790 (Approx. 6 pages)

Unusual and "badly-worded" GMP clause reviewed

by PLC Construction
Published on 13 Feb 2013 • England, Wales
In AMEC Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Defence [2013] EWHC 110 (TCC), Coulson J in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) rejected a challenge against a dispute review board's (DRB) award concerning the meaning of a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) clause. The DRB was constituted as an arbitration and the board's award was appealed under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.