Constangy: Key West, Florida, as Public Employer, Can’t Drug Test as if it Were in the Private Sector | Practical Law

Constangy: Key West, Florida, as Public Employer, Can’t Drug Test as if it Were in the Private Sector | Practical Law

This Law Firm Publication by Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP discusses a recent decision from a Florida federal court. In this case, an applicant for a position with the City of Key West, who was required to take a pre-employment drug test, sued the City, arguing that the drug test requirement violated her Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The City argued that the need for a drug-free workplace was a "special need," that the drug test was a reasonable search because it applied only to applicants, and that the job was safety-sensitive. The court rejected these arguments, finding that there was no evidence showing that drug abuse was an issue, the job was not safety-sensitive because it did not require exposure to dangerous machinery and was mostly a desk job. The court also rejected the City’s argument that applicants could "reasonably" be tested even if employees could not.

Constangy: Key West, Florida, as Public Employer, Can’t Drug Test as if it Were in the Private Sector

by Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP
Published on 06 Aug 2014Florida, United States
This Law Firm Publication by Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP discusses a recent decision from a Florida federal court. In this case, an applicant for a position with the City of Key West, who was required to take a pre-employment drug test, sued the City, arguing that the drug test requirement violated her Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The City argued that the need for a drug-free workplace was a "special need," that the drug test was a reasonable search because it applied only to applicants, and that the job was safety-sensitive. The court rejected these arguments, finding that there was no evidence showing that drug abuse was an issue, the job was not safety-sensitive because it did not require exposure to dangerous machinery and was mostly a desk job. The court also rejected the City’s argument that applicants could "reasonably" be tested even if employees could not.