Court considers application for stay under section 9 English Arbitration Act 1996 or court's inherent jurisdiction (High Court) | Practical Law

Court considers application for stay under section 9 English Arbitration Act 1996 or court's inherent jurisdiction (High Court) | Practical Law

In In the matter of Fenox (UK) Limited sub nom J & W Sanderson Limited v (1) Fenox (UK) Limited (2) Fenox Automotive Limited (3) Vitali Arbuzov (4) Ihar Putitski (5) Uladzimir Khrystsich [2014] EWHC 4322(Ch), the court considered whether to stay court proceedings in favour of arbitration either under section 9 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 or its inherent jurisdiction.

Court considers application for stay under section 9 English Arbitration Act 1996 or court's inherent jurisdiction (High Court)

by Practical Law Arbitration
Published on 07 Jan 2015 • England, Wales
In In the matter of Fenox (UK) Limited sub nom J & W Sanderson Limited v (1) Fenox (UK) Limited (2) Fenox Automotive Limited (3) Vitali Arbuzov (4) Ihar Putitski (5) Uladzimir Khrystsich [2014] EWHC 4322(Ch), the court considered whether to stay court proceedings in favour of arbitration either under section 9 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 or its inherent jurisdiction.