Judge Gives Preliminary Approval to $24 Million Settlement in Teva Pay-for-delay Class Action | Practical Law

Judge Gives Preliminary Approval to $24 Million Settlement in Teva Pay-for-delay Class Action | Practical Law

Judge William G. Young of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts preliminarily approved a $24 million settlement in a pay-for-delay class action brought by direct purchasers and end-payors of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.'s heartburn drug, Nexium.

Judge Gives Preliminary Approval to $24 Million Settlement in Teva Pay-for-delay Class Action

by Practical Law Antitrust
Published on 15 Jun 2015USA (National/Federal)
Judge William G. Young of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts preliminarily approved a $24 million settlement in a pay-for-delay class action brought by direct purchasers and end-payors of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.'s heartburn drug, Nexium.
On June 12, 2015, Judge William G. Young of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts preliminarily approved a $24 million settlement in a pay-for-delay class action brought by direct purchasers and end-payors of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.'s heartburn drug, Nexium, in In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation, No. 1-12-02409 (D. Mass. June 12, 2015). In Nexium, the two plaintiff classes alleged that a generic manufacturer, Teva, and a brand name manufacturer, AstraZeneca Plc, entered a reverse payment settlement agreement (otherwise known as pay-for-delay agreement) to delay market entry of a generic version of Nexium.
The court found that for both plaintiff classes, the settlement is:
  • Sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate.
  • In the best interest of class members.
The settlement was announced in April 2015. The settlement does not include many major pharmacies, such as CVS and Rite Aid.
All proceedings by the direct purchaser class and end-payor class against Teva are stayed pending final approval of the settlement, expected in September.
Late last year, a District of Massachusetts jury in Nexium found that an agreement between AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd to delay the launch of a generic form of Nexium was not anticompetitive (No. 1-12-02409 (D. Mass. Dec. 5, 2014)). For more information on the jury's decision, see Legal Update, Jury Finds Nexium Pay-for-delay Agreement was Not Anticompetitive.