GC Agenda China: September 2015 | Practical Law

GC Agenda China: September 2015 | Practical Law

A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.

GC Agenda China: September 2015

Practical Law UK Articles 5-618-9286 (Approx. 8 pages)

GC Agenda China: September 2015

by Brad Herrold, Consultant and Practical Law China
Law stated as at 24 Sep 2015China
A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
The September 2015 edition of GC Agenda China is the eighteenth in the series.

Speedread

A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and investigates the key issues affecting businesses, provides insight from leading practitioners and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
This month's GC Agenda covers:
  • The recent amendment to China's criminal law and its implications for data protection and anti-bribery matters.
  • SAIC's updated rules on business registrations.
  • The dismantling of some of the restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector.
  • The abolition of limits on how much Chinese banks can lend.
  • New rules from SAFE that will make it easier for multinational corporations to centralise the processing of foreign exchange management for group companies.
The September 2015 edition of GC Agenda China is the eighteenth in the series.

NPC amends criminal law data privacy and anti-corruption provisions

On 29 August 2015, the National People's Congress enacted a ninth round of amendments to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, which will take effect 1 November 2015. The changes significantly strengthen the government's ability to enforce China's rules on data protection, network security and bribery and corruption. The amended law:
  • Broadens the scope of liability and increases the corresponding punishments for selling or providing personal information in violation of China's national data privacy rules.
  • Imposes new penalties on internet service providers and internet content providers (and their responsible persons) for failing to carry out China's national network security rules.
  • Levies criminal sanctions for conducting or facilitating illegal behaviour on information networks.
  • Assigns criminal liability to businesses and their responsible persons who offer bribes to close relatives or associates of current or former state personnel (or their close relatives or associates).
  • Inflicts fines and prison terms on individuals convicted of offering or receiving bribes.
  • Clarifies the circumstances under which an individual may be exempted from criminal liability under China's anti-bribery rules by self-reporting.

Market reaction

Paul McKenzie, Partner, Morrison & Foerster Beijing

"Amendment nine includes far-reaching changes to the Criminal Law. Changes to provisions governing corruption give the public security authorities a broader range of penalties and other tools to pursue parties involved in bribery. Significantly broadened provisions dealing with misuse of personal data provide much greater discretion to pursue criminal penalties for breaches of data privacy. And altogether new provisions governing computer network security portend greater activity by PRC authorities in the criminal sphere as part of the government's cybersecurity drive."

Action items

As new penalties have been created for data privacy violations, GC should scrutinise customer and employee data protection systems thoroughly to minimise the potential for data breaches. GC may find the increased criminal sanctions for bribery related offenses helpful in focusing colleagues' minds on the importance of delineating and enforcing internal anti-corruption safeguards, and may wish to update internal training materials to reflect the penalties that may now be imposed.

SAIC Updates Business Scope Registration Rules

On 27 August 2015, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) issued the Provisions on the Administration of Business Scope Registration for Enterprises 2015, which replace previous provisions of the same name and take effect on 1 October 2015. Most of the requirements on business registration under the old provisions will continue in force under the new provisions. However, under the new provisions, where a company's business scope contains one or more items which require approval (whether this approval must be obtained before or after formation), the company must make public the name, examination and approval authority, content, term of validity and other information contained in any approval document or certificate within 20 business days after issue of the approval. This should be done through the SAIC's new, online enterprise credit information disclosure system. The new provisions also require enterprises subject to preliminary approval to make an identical public disclosure within 20 days after formation. Any subsequent amendments to an approval document or certificate also must be disclosed within 20 business days after issue of the amended approval. Most of the other changes contained in the new provisions reflect recent changes to the law.
For further information on business registration generally, see Practice note: Establishing a China business, Business registration in China. For further information on the recent changes to the Company Law of the People's Republic of China, see Practice Note: Understanding the 2013 Company Law reforms: China.

Market reaction

Robert Lewis, Senior Counsel, Zhong Lun Law Firm Beijing

"While these changes still do not bring us appreciably closer to a situation where enterprises in China are permitted to adopt a general scope of business, the amended provisions do provide helpful clarity and transparency in relation to the process for approval of the specific business scope to be set out in the business license of an FIE."

Action items

GC for companies with China registered subsidiaries should familiarise themselves with the new online platforms and the process for disclosing information and ensure that those companies have made the necessary disclosures.

NPC lifts loan to deposit cap for commercial banks

On 29 August 2015, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress revised the Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks. The changes take effect from 1 October 2015. The revised law eliminates the 75% loan-to-deposit cap (that is, the requirement that a bank holds RMB1 in deposits for every RMB0.75 that it lends out) for commercial banks. Commercial banks in China had previously been subject to this cap since 1994, in addition to their other prudential requirements. Commercial banks remain subject to a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8%. The restriction that banks may not lend more than 10% of their capital to a single borrower also remains in place.

Market reaction

Shirley Wang, partner, Zhong Lun Law Firm Beijing

"The revisions reflect a widely held view that there is no more need to impose the ratio on commercial banks as the relevant liquidity ratios formulated under Basel III have been adopted in the Chinese banking system. Further, the elimination of the ratio on deposits to loans will spur the banks to optimise their loan pricing models and increase their ability to manage their assets and liabilities."

Action items

There are no action items.

MOHURD and other agencies ease restrictions on foreign investment in real estate

On 19 August 2015, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) and five other government regulators, including SAFE and the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), jointly released a notice to encourage foreign investment in the real estate sector for the first time since several restrictions were introduced beginning in 2006 to address an overheated property market. The notice is widely viewed as another step in the government's recent efforts to stimulate China's economy. Of particular interest, the notice:
  • Eliminates the 1:1 debt-to-equity ratio requirement, as well as the requirement that investors pay in full all subscribed capital before utilising debt financing. Both restrictions were imposed on foreign invested real estate enterprises (FIREEs) in 2006. FIREEs are now subject to the same debt-to-equity and debt financing rules as conventional foreign invested enterprises.
  • Retains the "self-use" requirement for foreign nationals, representative offices and PRC branches wishing to directly purchase onshore residential property, but discards the 12-month prior residency requirement imposed on foreign nationals as part of the 2006 restrictions.
  • Permits FIREES to apply directly to foreign exchange banks to carry out foreign exchange registration and open bank accounts without obtaining SAFE approval (though this provision only restates current law).
  • Directs MOFCOM and other regulators to simplify and improve the administration of foreign invested real estate projects.
For further coverage of this development, see Legal update: Restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector eased. For further information on the capital requirements applicable to foreign invested enterprises, see Practice note: Understanding the 2013 Company Law reforms: China: Company capitalisation reforms.

Market reaction

Stephen Lin, Partner, Fangda Partners Shanghai

"Circular 122 relaxes certain post-2006 restrictive measures imposed by PRC government on foreign investment in the real estate sector. Its actual market influence, however, remains finite, given that most of the post-2006 restrictions are still valid. The market is waiting to see if further relaxation measures will be promulgated by the central government."

Action items

GC for property development companies and other businesses interested in investing in China's real estate market may wish to alert colleagues that the restrictions to foreign investment introduced since 2006 are being dismantled (although they should note that several of the restrictions remain in force), and to monitor communications from MOHURD and other agencies for signs of further liberalisation of the sector.

SAFE amends provisions on centralised processing of foreign exchange by MNCs

On 5 August 2015, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) issued the Provisions on Centralised Operation and Management of Foreign Exchange Funds by Transnational Companies. The new rules replace similar rules released for trial implementation in 2014. The new rules permit the head office of any multinational company (MNC) to designate one onshore subsidiary to open master accounts with designated onshore banks, provided:
  • The MNC's participating onshore subsidiaries have a consolidated amount of at least USD100 million of revenue and expenditures in the preceding fiscal year.
  • The MNC satisfies SAFE's other regulatory requirements.
The accounts may be used to pool and distribute foreign exchange among the MNC's onshore and offshore group members.
The new rules also include a pilot programme that permits a MNC to pool and share the foreign debt quota of its participating onshore subsidiaries. Under the pilot programme, the amount of the foreign debt quota may be determined by either:
  • The aggregate net assets of participating onshore subsidiaries.
  • The aggregate borrowing gap (that is, the difference between a subsidiary's registered capital and its total investment) of participating onshore subsidiaries.
Foreign debt incurred through the pilot programme may be used to conduct onshore equity investments or to refinance domestic RMB loans.
For further coverage of this development, see Legal update: SAFE amends provisions on centralised processing of MNC foreign exchange funds. For further information on foreign debt regulation generally, see Practice note: Foreign exchange control in China: Regulation of foreign debt.

Market reaction

Gloria Liu, Partner, DLA Piper Hong Kong

"The new circular signals that SAFE may be fundamentally changing its approach in foreign exchange regulation - from prohibition to guidance - as it further liberates foreign exchange control, and in particular, the restrictions on foreign debts. The pilot programme permits an FIE to cap its foreign debts based on net assets rather than the difference between its amount of total investment and registered capital."

Action items

GC for qualified MNCs may wish to collaborate with senior finance personnel to determine if the new rules present an opportunity to improve the leverage and overall capital structure and operations of the group's China-based and offshore subsidiaries.

European Court of Justice issues judgment in Huawei v ZTE SEP injunction case

In 2013, the Regional Court of Dusseldorf made a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in a case involving German subsidiaries of Chinese telecommunications company Huawei, as the holder of standard essential patents (SEPs), and ZTE, as the alleged infringer of the SEPs. When Huawei sought a prohibitive injunction against ZTE for its use of Huawei's SEPs, ZTE asserted as a defence Huawei's abuse of dominance, grounded both on the use of an SEP injunction and on the concept of a willing licensee. The German court decided to seek guidance from the ECJ so that its approach would not conflict with recent holdings in cases involving Samsung and Motorola. The ECJ recently issued a judgment that obligates an SEP holder to provide an alleged infringer with:
  • Notice of an alleged infringement, which specifies the relevant SEPs and the manner in which they have been infringed.
  • A written offer to license the SEPs, including a proposed royalty and the manner for calculating the royalty, before seeking injunctive relief.
The ruling also requires:
  • The licensing offer to be based on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory, or FRAND terms.
  • The alleged infringer to respond in a diligent and serious manner.
If the alleged infringer disagrees with the offer, the infringer must promptly provide a counter offer that expressly addresses the terms of the offer to which it objects before he can assert an abuse of dominance defence.

Market reaction

David Wilson, partner, Herbert Smith Freehills London

"This case provides important guidance and welcome clarity to both SEP holders and alleged infringers as to what steps each must take to retain either the right to request or the right to object to a claim for injunction preventing the use of an SEP".

Action items

GC for Chinese SEP holders seeking to enforce patent rights in the EU should provide infringers a formal offer and draft license, setting out appropriate details of the infringement. GC for companies that are challenged as infringers should refrain from delaying tactics and provide a detailed counter offer to preserve the right to challenge a prohibitory injunction.