Court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relief even where there is no proposed or intended arbitration

An update on AES UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v UST-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant [2010] EWHC 772 (Comm), in which the court considered its jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relief where there is no actual or intended arbitration.

The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against this decision ([2011] EWCA Civ 647). We will report on the Court of Appeal's decision shortly.

PLC Arbitration


 

The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area
 

Login

Subscribers and trialists can login below

Contact Us

If you need assistance logging in or have any questions about our services, please contact us.

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247353372102", "objName" : "Court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relie", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://us.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/us/resource/6-502-0797?null", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "26f960bd5:149e98a7561:-3b6d", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "26f960bd5:149e98a7561:-3b6c", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }