Ruling in multidistrict litigation involving electronic components compels plaintiffs to specify factual basis for allegations of conspiracy regarding finished products | Practical Law

Ruling in multidistrict litigation involving electronic components compels plaintiffs to specify factual basis for allegations of conspiracy regarding finished products | Practical Law

On 18 November 2010, Special Master Hon. Charles A. Legge issued a Report and Recommendation Regarding Discovery Motions (Report and Recommendation) to Hon. Samuel Conti, the judge presiding over In Re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation pending in the Northern District of California. The Report and Recommendation stated that the defendants' motion to compel the class action plaintiffs to respond to various discovery requests regarding the factual basis for their allegations of conspiracy regarding finished products containing cathode ray tubes, before substantial discovery regarding such allegations could commence, be granted

Ruling in multidistrict litigation involving electronic components compels plaintiffs to specify factual basis for allegations of conspiracy regarding finished products

by Practical Law
Law stated as at 18 Nov 2010 • USA (National/Federal)
On 18 November 2010, Special Master Hon. Charles A. Legge issued a Report and Recommendation Regarding Discovery Motions (Report and Recommendation) to Hon. Samuel Conti, the judge presiding over In Re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation pending in the Northern District of California. The Report and Recommendation stated that the defendants' motion to compel the class action plaintiffs to respond to various discovery requests regarding the factual basis for their allegations of conspiracy regarding finished products containing cathode ray tubes, before substantial discovery regarding such allegations could commence, be granted