ICSID tribunal rules on elements required for an investment | Practical Law

ICSID tribunal rules on elements required for an investment | Practical Law

An update on Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (Decision on Jurisdiction of 27 September 2012), which considered whether there was a relevant investment for the purposes of ICSID arbitration proceedings under the bilateral investment treaty between Chile and Bolivia.

ICSID tribunal rules on elements required for an investment

Practical Law UK Legal Update 6-521-9142 (Approx. 3 pages)

ICSID tribunal rules on elements required for an investment

by PLC Arbitration
Published on 19 Oct 2012 • International, USA (National/Federal)
An update on Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (Decision on Jurisdiction of 27 September 2012), which considered whether there was a relevant investment for the purposes of ICSID arbitration proceedings under the bilateral investment treaty between Chile and Bolivia.