Meaning of asset for purposes of section 44(3) Arbitration Act 1996 (Commercial Court) | Practical Law

Meaning of asset for purposes of section 44(3) Arbitration Act 1996 (Commercial Court) | Practical Law

In Euroil Ltd v Cameroon Offshore Petroleum SARL [2014] EWHC 52 (Comm), the court considered whether to continue an ex parte injunction under section 44(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996.  

Meaning of asset for purposes of section 44(3) Arbitration Act 1996 (Commercial Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 6-556-4345 (Approx. 3 pages)

Meaning of asset for purposes of section 44(3) Arbitration Act 1996 (Commercial Court)

by Practical Law Arbitration
Published on 05 Feb 2014England, Wales
In Euroil Ltd v Cameroon Offshore Petroleum SARL [2014] EWHC 52 (Comm), the court considered whether to continue an ex parte injunction under section 44(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996.