Litigation or arbitration in cross-border outsourcing: what is the better fit? | Practical Law

Litigation or arbitration in cross-border outsourcing: what is the better fit? | Practical Law

This article is part of the Outsourcing Global Guide. It addresses the advantages and disadvantages of using alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for business structures involving outsourcing. In particular, it deals with the structure of cross-border outsourcing projects and agreements; the benefits of expedited ADR; the procedures required to benefit from expedited ADR; the accession of subsidiaries or group members to ADR and the relative benefits of judgments emanating from litigation rather than ADR.

Litigation or arbitration in cross-border outsourcing: what is the better fit?

Practical Law UK Articles 6-633-6908 (Approx. 8 pages)

Litigation or arbitration in cross-border outsourcing: what is the better fit?

by Dr András Gurovits and Tamir Livschitz, Niederer, Kraft & Frey
Law stated as at 01 Sep 2016Switzerland
This article is part of the Outsourcing Global Guide. It addresses the advantages and disadvantages of using alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for business structures involving outsourcing. In particular, it deals with the structure of cross-border outsourcing projects and agreements; the benefits of expedited ADR; the procedures required to benefit from expedited ADR; the accession of subsidiaries or group members to ADR and the relative benefits of judgments emanating from litigation rather than ADR.
This article is part of the global guide to outsourcing. For a full list of contents, please visit global.practicallaw.com/outsourcing-guide.