Restructuring and insolvency in Spain: overview
A Q&A guide to restructuring and insolvency law in Spain.
The Q&A gives a high level overview of the most common forms of security granted over immovable and movable property; creditors' and shareholders' ranking on a company's insolvency; mechanisms to secure unpaid debts; mandatory set-off of mutual debts on insolvency; state support for distressed businesses; rescue and insolvency procedures; stakeholders' roles; liability for an insolvent company's debts; setting aside an insolvent company's pre-insolvency transactions; carrying on business during insolvency; additional finance; multinational cases; and proposals for reform.
To compare answers across multiple jurisdictions, visit the Restructuring and insolvency Country Q&A tool.
This Q&A is part of the global guide to restructuring and insolvency law. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit www.practicallaw.com/restructure-guide.
Forms of security
Common forms of security and formalities. The most common types of security for immovable property are:
Mortgage (hipoteca inmobiliaria). Under a mortgage, legal title to the property passes from the debtor to the creditor but possession does not. Legal title passes back to the debtor once the debt is repaid. A mortgage must be registered with the Land Register where the property is registered. If the debtor defaults on repayment of the debt, the creditor can enforce its rights through summary proceedings. During enforcement, the creditor can ask the court to administer the assets.
Pledge (anticresis). Under a pledge, the debtor assigns revenue from the property to the creditor as security for debt. If the debtor defaults, the creditor can take possession of the pledged property to recover the debt (unless the contract expressly excludes this). The creditor can also ask the court for the property to be sold to recover the debt.
Mortgages must be granted by public deed and registered with the registry where the affected assets are registered. Registration creates a security right.
Effects of non-compliance. If registration does not occur, the creditor has no right against any third party that acquires the relevant secured asset.
Common forms of security and formalities. The most common types of security for movable property are:
Chattel mortgage (hipoteca mobiliaria). This is a mortgage over chattels. The mortgage must be registered with the Chattel Mortgage and Non-Possessory Pledge Registry (Registro de Hipoteca mobiliaria y Prenda sin desplazamiento).
Possessory pledge (prenda posesoria). Under this pledge, the pledged asset is placed under the creditor's control. If the debtor defaults, the creditor can begin enforcement proceedings to sell the asset and recover the debt from the proceeds.
Non-possessory pledge (prenda sin desplazamiento). With this pledge, the pledged asset remains in the debtor's possession and the creditor's interest is protected through registration of the right at the appropriate registry. There are certain specific obligations and restrictions imposed on the debtor related to the preservation, movement and disposal of the asset.
As with mortgages, the non-possessory pledges must be granted by public deed and registered with the registry where the affected assets are registered. Registration creates a security right.
Effects of non-compliance. If registration does not occur, the creditor has no right against any third party that acquires the relevant secured asset.
Creditor and contributory ranking
Creditors are ranked in the following categories (Articles 89 to 92, Insolvency Act 22/2003 (Ley Concursal)) (Insolvency Act):
Preferential creditors (créditos privilegiados). These creditors are divided into two subcategories:
Creditors with special privileges (créditos con privilegio especial). This subcategory includes:
construction or repair creditors (créditos refaccionarios). For example, employees may be able to recover wages owed to them by the sale of assets they have manufactured which are owned by the debtor (employer) or are in the debtor's possession;
creditors with rights in property (limited to the secured amount);
creditors under financial lease agreements or sale and purchase agreements where the debtor repays the debt in instalments;
creditors with interests in book-entry securities;
creditors to whom property has been transferred.
Creditors with general privileges (créditos con privilegio general). This subcategory includes:
employees owed wages who do not have special privileges;
employees with indemnities arising from the termination of employment contracts, workplace accidents and professional illnesses, as well as debts owed for breaches of occupational health and safety obligations (if accrued before the declaration of insolvency);
employees owed amounts relating to tax and social security withholdings;
contractors and authors of intellectual property works who have assigned exploitation rights in their work in return for payment, if accrued in the six months before declaration of insolvency;
employees with up to 50% of the amounts owing on tax and social security claims as well as any other public debts, if they do not enjoy any other preferential treatment;
claims for non-contractual civil liability;
creditors with up to 50% of the debt owed who petitioned for the insolvency of the debtor, provided the relevant debt owed is not subordinated.
Ordinary creditors (créditos ordinarios). These are creditors with debts that cannot be classed as privileged or subordinated (see below) are ordinary debts.
Subordinated creditors (créditos subordinados). These are creditors with debts which are considered subordinated debts. Subordinated debts are those:
reported late or inappropriately (that is, where there is a failure to report them within the statutory period);
treated as subordinated as a result of a contractual agreement, such as participative or subordinated loans;
relating to an interest of any kind, except those arising from rights in property, up to the limit stated in the guarantee;
owed to shareholders holding at least 5% (for companies listed on a recognised stock exchange) or 10% (for unlisted companies) of the company's share capital, or by any person related to the creditor (as defined in Article 93 of the Insolvency Act);
relating to any claim made in bad faith.
Credits against the insolvency estate (créditos contra la masa). These are arise after the declaration of insolvency and must be paid on maturity. Credits against the insolvency state include:
credits for salaries for the last 30 days worked before the declaration of insolvency on amount not exceeding twice the minimum wage (EUR655.20 per month);
legal costs and necessary expenses for the application and declaration of insolvency, and the assistance and representation of the insolvent and the administrator throughout the proceeding;
alimony of the debtor and the people to whom he had a legal duty to provide it;
credits generated by the practice of professional or business activity of the debtor after the declaration of insolvency, including wage debts, severance pay and termination of employment contacts;
50% of the credits involving new cash revenue granted under a refinancing agreement (fresh money).
Although not covered by the Insolvency Act, there are other privileged debts, including:
Legal tacit mortgages (hipoteca legal tácita). These relate to real estate taxes payable on immovable property for the previous financial year.
Super privileges granted to employees. The last 30 days' wages owed to employees have priority over any other debt owed, including those relating to mortgages or any other creditors with rights in property.
Unpaid debts and recovery
In addition to security rights in property, trade creditors can use credit rights (garantías de crédito) to secure unpaid debts. The most common credit rights are:
Bail (fianza). A third-party guarantor (fiador) undertakes to pay or perform on the debtor's behalf, if the debtor is unable to do so. Joint and several guarantees (fianza solidaria) are common. These allow the creditor to enforce its credit right against the debtor or the guarantor, or against both at the same time.
Credit risk insurance (seguro de caución). Under a credit risk insurance contract, the insurer pays the creditor if the debtor (who is the policyholder) defaults. If this occurs, the insurance company ranks the creditor's position in front of the debtor.
Lien (derecho de retención). This mechanism allows the creditor to retain possession and control of property until the debtor repays its debt. It differs from a pledge because the creditor does not have the right to sell the property on default, but is entitled to hold the property until the debt is repaid.
Penalty clause (cláusula penal). A penalty clause is frequently included in a contract. If the debtor defaults, a fixed sum must usually be paid as liquidated damages. The Insolvency Court can declare these clauses void.
Provided insolvency proceedings have not begun, any creditor can bring the following civil actions against the debtor:
Ordinary proceedings. These are used to obtain an order to make the debtor comply with a particular ruling or to seize the debtor's assets for an amount sufficient to let the creditor recover the debt owed and claim for damages. Court resolutions can be enforced immediately.
Monetary process (proceso monitorio). These are brief proceedings that allow the creditor to recover an unlimited amount, provided the debt is stated in a document.
Special proceedings for bills of exchange (juicio cambiario). This is an action used to recover debts that are covered by bills of exchange, cheques or promissory notes.
Special proceedings to execute unpaid pledges and mortgages (procedimiento de ejecución sobre bienes hipotecados o pignorados). This is a procedure used to enforce mortgages or pledges over assets. It can be started even if the debtor is involved in insolvency proceedings, but receivers may ask for a stay of a year if the affected property is used to carry on the activity of the company.
Rescue and insolvency procedures
Insolvency proceedings (concurso)
Objective. This is the only procedure that affects both individuals and legal entities and has the objective of trying to organise the payment of the creditors and maintaining the activity of the insolvent.
Initiation. The procedure begins with filing an insolvency petition with the Commercial Court (Juzgado de lo Mercantil) of the capital of the province in which the debtor has its centre of main interest (COMI). For legal entities, COMI is the place where the entity's registered office is located. Insolvency applies to both individuals and to legal entities. The Insolvency Act also has provisions covering the insolvency of groups of companies. Public bodies cannot be declared bankrupt. There are also special provisions for insurance companies or banks that become insolvent.
If insolvency proceedings are voluntary (concurso voluntario), the directors or liquidators must file the insolvency petition. If they are compulsory (concurso necesario), the insolvency petition can be filed by:
A creditor, provided the company is deemed to be currently insolvent (see below, Substantive tests).
Shareholders who are personally liable for the company's debts, provided the company is currently, rather than imminently, insolvent (see below, Substantive tests).
An insolvency petition must be filed in writing and accompanied by certain documents (which may vary depending on who the petitioner is and if the insolvency is imminent or current).
A company must apply for insolvency within two months of the date on which it becomes aware, or should have become aware, that it is insolvent. The Insolvency Act sets out a series of situations in which the company is deemed to have knowledge of insolvency.
There is no time limit in which a creditor or shareholders must file an insolvency petition, provided the objective grounds for insolvency are met (see below, Substantive tests).
The declaration of insolvency must be published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado). It must also be registered with the Registry for Insolvency Proceedings (Registro de Procedimientos de Insolvencia).
Substantive tests. An insolvency petition can be filed if a company is unable to pay its debts as they become due (current insolvency) or if it foresees that this will happen in the near future (imminent insolvency).
If a company files an insolvency petition, it must provide evidence of its debts and its current or imminent insolvency.
If a creditor files an insolvency petition, it must be based on one of the following grounds:
The company has failed to pay debts when they became due.
The creditor cannot exercise its security rights because the company's assets have been seized.
The company has disposed of or liquidated assets to put them beyond creditors' reach.
The company has defaulted on one of the following in the three months before the insolvency petition is filed:
social security contributions;
salaries and indemnities related to employees.
The aims of the proceedings depend on whether the debtor is being rescued or liquidated (bankruptcy):
Rescue (covenio). The objective is to restructure the debt to allow the debtor to continue operating. The debtor makes an arrangement with creditors to reduce its debt over a certain period of time, u p to the limitations set by the Insolvency Act (a debt reduction of not more than 50% and/or a stay of proceedings of not more than five years), nevertheless, those limits are sometimes exceeded, depending on the case and the future viability perspectives of the insolvent company.
If the debtor has requested rescue, an arrangement with its ordinary creditors must be reached and approved by the creditor at a creditors' meeting, and by the court. The agreement can also be reached in writing (without holding a creditors' meeting).
The debtor or its creditors can make an arrangement proposal. If made by the company and liquidation is not required, the proposal can be put forward before the end of the period in which the creditors must submit proof of their claims (convenio anticipado). This proposal may provide for termination of the proceedings by fast track (see below, Length of procedure). If the anticipated arrangement is not put forward by the debtor, the debtor or the creditors can propose a suitable expiration period for contesting the inventory of assets and list of creditors. Since the reforms of the Insolvency Act, by Act No. 9/2015 of 25 May, privileged creditors may be affected by the agreement if they vote in favour of it. On one hand, the privileged creditors are included in the constitution quorum of the creditors meeting, and on the other hand, in order to get the arrangement proposal accepted by the creditor's meeting, the privileged creditors will be considered included in the required ordinary majorities, if they vote in favour of such a proposal. If they join the arrangement, they will lose their preferential status and will be subject to the proposed debt repayment structure of the agreement itself.
Creditors with subordinated debts or debts acquired after insolvency is filed cannot vote on the arrangement. However, they will become affected as the ordinary creditors if the proposal is finally accepted.
Consent and approvals. An arrangement is approved if at least 50% or 65% of the ordinary creditors, depending on the conditions of the agreement, vote in its favour. However, if the total value of debts owed to ordinary creditors voting in favour of the arrangement is greater than the total value of debts owed to ordinary creditors voting against the arrangement, it can be approved if either:
The agreement provides for ordinary debts to be repaid in full within three years.
The agreement provides for ordinary debts to be repaid immediately with a write-off of less than 20%.
Since 2015, to get the arrangement proposal accepted by the creditor's meeting, the privileged creditors will be considered included in the required ordinary majorities, if they vote in favour of such a proposal.
The agreement approved by creditors must be confirmed by the court if both:
Statutory requirements are met.
No creditor objects to the arrangement or, if an objection is made, it is rejected by the court.
No consents or approvals are required if a company is to be liquidated. The company can request liquidation itself or it starts automatically if no agreement is proposed in the due term, or is rejected.
Liquidation (liquidación). The objective is to sell the assets of the debtor company to repay as much of the debt owed to the creditors as possible. Once the liquidation phase is opened, the management of the insolvent company cease on its functions and the insolvency administrator becomes the only person with capacity to represent and manage the company until its final liquidation and dissolution. Every three months after the liquidation phase is opened, the insolvency administrator must submit a liquidation report before the court in order to inform about the liquidation tasks ad the payment of credits against the state done during such quarterly period. The insolvency administrator must also submit a liquidation plan explaining the way proposed to liquidate all the insolvent company assets. However, there are two exceptions when it will be possible to continue execution proceedings after the insolvency declaration and until the liquidation plan's approval:
Public executions (if a seizure report has already been ruled on).
Labour executions, where company assets would have been already seized.
In both cases the seizures must have been declared before the insolvency declaration.
Supervision and control. During the insolvency proceedings, the court appoints a person to administer the insolvent company.
Protection from creditors. During the insolvency proceedings, the creditors cannot begin any in-court or out-of-court execution proceedings, or administrative or state tax writs against the assets.
Length of procedure. It is difficult to estimate how long insolvency proceedings will take, but 12 to 20 months is usual, depending on the complexity of the case. A shorter procedure (procedimiento abreviado) is available to companies, whereby a liquidation plan that contains a binding written proposal to buy the production unit running or companies that have completely stopped activities and did not have employment contracts. The judge may decide to process the bankruptcy by procedimiento abreviado if he considers that there is little complexity (that is, there are fewer than 50 employees, assets and rights that do not exceed EUR5 million and liabilities do not exceed EUR5 million). If this procedure is used, the statutory time limits set out in the Insolvency Act are reduced by one-half.
Summary. Insolvency proceedings have the following effects:
In a voluntary insolvency, directors remain in their positions and the company continues managing its assets, subject to the supervision of the receivers, or insolvency administrator (administrador concursal), unless the court forces it to be treated in the same way as a compulsory insolvency (see below).
In a compulsory insolvency, receivers take over the administration of the company's assets, unless the court orders it to be treated in the same way as a voluntary insolvency, and therefore the directors remain in their positions (see above).
Unless the company asks for liquidation, its business does not usually cease on insolvency (see Question 9). If the receivers are merely supervising, they determine the activities and transactions that the company can continue to manage in the ordinary course of business. If the receivers take over the management of the business, they must take the necessary steps to ensure that its commercial activities continue.
During insolvency proceedings, shareholders continue to function as usual, but receivers can attend and have the right to be heard at their meetings. The same applies for the board of directors' meetings.
Once a company has been declared insolvent, a list of creditors is prepared and creditors are ranked according to the priority of their debts (see Question 2).
The recovery of the credit amounts depends on the outcome of the insolvency proceeding. If the company reached an agreement, the terms of the payment will be fixed there and will depend on the approved payment clauses. If the company is wound up, the ordinary and subordinated creditors will not be paid until creditors against the sate and privileged creditors are fully repaid.
Any proceedings that a creditor may wish to bring against the insolvent company (see Question 4) that could affect its assets must be dealt with by the insolvency judge.
Once an insolvency order has been made, no arbitration proceedings can be started.
If court and/or arbitration proceedings have already begun, they will continue in the same court until the judgment or award becomes final and binding. However, it is not possible to execute the judgment or award. In some cases, the insolvency court will assume the jurisdiction of the case.
No individual judicial or extra-judicial enforcement actions can be brought against the company's assets, and actions that have already begun are stayed from the date of the declaration of insolvency. However, there is an exception for creditors with a security interest in property over assets of the company that are used in its commercial activities. These creditors can bring enforcement proceedings from the date on which the composition agreement is approved or after one year of the insolvency order if the liquidation has not begun.
The company's debts cannot be set off against monies owed to it.
No interest accrues, other than interest on debts that have a legal guarantee.
The limitation period for actions relating to debts that pre-date the insolvency is postponed during insolvency proceedings.
Contracts with mutual obligations that have not yet been performed remain in force, although the creditor can terminate them if the company defaults.
Clauses allowing a contract to be terminated if an insolvency is declared are void.
During the liquidation, the company cannot administer or dispose of its assets, without consent of the insolvency administrator.
Creditors must submit proof of their claims within one month of the court's decision to start insolvency proceedings.
Insolvency proceedings end if:
The court declares that the conditions of the debtor's arrangement with the creditor have been fully met.
The Court of Appeal (Audiencia Provincial) revokes the insolvency declaration.
Actions for breach of the agreement have been declared lapsed or rejected by the court.
In addition, insolvency proceedings end regardless of the stage they have reached (provided the receivers have prepared their report and the relevant parties have attended court), if either:
All recognised debts are repaid or the creditors are satisfied in full by other means.
It is proved that the company has no assets to repay its debts and no party is liable for this lack of assets.
Refinancing agreements (refinanciación)
Act No. 17/2014 of 30 September 2014, adopting urgent measures on business debt refinancing and restructuring, modified some relevant aspects regarding the refinancing agreements subscribed by an insolvent company and its validation by the court to avoid clawback actions. Such refinancing agreement regulation has also been modified by Act No. 9/2015 of 25 May 2015, of urgent measures in insolvency files, particularly regarding the validation by the court, the required majorities and the elimination of the independent expert report obligation.
These amendments of the Insolvency Act aim to improve the refinancing agreements and to change the realities of filing for bankruptcy proceedings (nine out of ten companies that file for bankruptcy are liquidated) and benefit the creditors' chances of repayment.
Objective. Refinancing proceedings allow the debtor to reach an agreement with the majority of its creditors to increase the available credit or to modify its obligations to avoid insolvency court proceedings.
Initiation. These proceedings are started exclusively by the debtor. The refinancing agreement must include a viability plan that allows the debtor to continue activity in the short- and medium-term. In addition, if the debtor wants the agreement to remain out of reach of any eventual clawback actions, the agreement must be certified by an account auditor and granted in a public deed.
Consent and approvals. There must be at least 60% of the debtor company's debt at the date of the refinancing agreement and 51% of the financing creditors to become accepted by the court.
Supervision and control. A report confirming the effectiveness of the proposed refinancing must be obtained from an auditor appointed by the Company's Registry (Resgistro Mercantil), if the company does not have its own auditor. The refinancing agreement must be granted by public deed.
Length of procedure. There is no set length of procedure.
Conclusion. The refinancing agreement provides for modification of the debtor's total available credit or the debtor's obligations. When it is approved by the required majority and by the court, it affects all the creditors that voluntarily have decided to adhere to it (for example, labour credits, commercial credits or public credits) or have been affected through the fulfilling of certain requirements (for example, financing creditors that did not vote or vote against the refinancing agreement). This allows the company to avoid insolvency court proceedings, provided the debtor observes the agreement's provisions.
On the other hand, the Insolvency Act regulates an out-of-court refinancing agreement that has been developed by Act No. 9/2015 of 25 May 2015, in order to try to solve over-indebtedness of individuals, giving them a second change mechanism to cancel some kind of debts if particular requirements are accomplished.
See information on liquidation during insolvency proceedings (concurso) in Question 6.
In a voluntary insolvency proceeding, directors have the most significant role because they remain in their positions and the company continues to manage its assets, until the moment that the liquidation phase becomes open. However, they need the receiver's authorisation for any act related to their economic activity. The receivers can grant prior and general authorisation for certain acts to expedite the continuation of the debtor's managerial activity. For the opening and acceptance of the composition agreement, the receiver will end his functions and the company will return to its normal activity.
The role of the stakeholders remains in second position because of a lack of management power, which belongs to the directors. In some cases, the directors are also the stakeholders or people closely related to them. This is why the recovery of the stakeholders' or directors' credits are later in the order of priority, due to their direct relation to the company.
Influence on outcome of procedure
In compulsory insolvencies, the receiver's role is more significant because the receiver takes over the administration of the company's assets from the first moment of the insolvency declaration and the debtor becomes separated from the management. In this type of insolvency, the receiver must adopt all necessary measures related to the continuation of the professional debtor's activity.
In both cases, either voluntary or compulsory proceedings, the receiver's role is essential because restructuring operations cannot be approved without their consent. However, all restructuring proceedings, in normal conditions, require the debtor's collaboration, who must appear in court when summoned by the receivers or the judge.
Therefore, influence on the outcome of the procedure should not be a possibility because the proceeding is closed to external interferences. The receiver and the court must be independent against any external influence from the stakeholders, managers, creditors or any other interested party.
Directors' liability is very strict and this is reflected in insolvency proceedings. When directors have not run the company properly or have not filed for insolvency within the term set by law, they risk being declared liable for the company's debts.
Liability can also arise if a company's insolvency was caused or aggravated by its directors' or liquidators' recklessness or gross negligence. This liability affects not only the appointed directors but also the de facto directors. This can have a serious effect when a group of companies becomes insolvent.
The Insolvency Act establishes a series of no-rebuttable presumptions that enable a finding of culpability in insolvency to be made when certain requirements are met. It also establishes a series of rebuttable presumptions that also allow a situation of insolvency to be classified as culpable, if no evidence is produced to show otherwise. The insolvency is presumed to be culpable, if no evidence is produced to show otherwise. The insolvency is presumed to be culpable when the debtor or, as the case may be, its legal representatives, directors, liquidators or partners are into some of the cases set out in the act.
If the court finds that directors have acted in bad faith, it can disqualify them from managing companies for two to 15 years. It can also require liable parties (or anyone who committed the same offence in the two years before the declaration of insolvency) to repay creditors all or part of any debt that is not recovered from the insolvent estate.
If shareholders and the company are liable for the company's debts before insolvency (for example, when shareholders' liability is not limited, such as in the case of collective companies (sociedades colectivas)), receivers or creditors can bring an action against the shareholders. They can also bring an action for the payment of unpaid capital.
If there are not enough assets in the insolvent estate to repay all debts and liability has been declared (or is likely to be declared), a seizure of assets can be ordered against:
Directors, liquidators or anyone performing the same functions as directors or liquidators in the two years before the insolvency order is made, if it is probable that they were responsible for causing the insolvency.
Shareholders who were liable for the company and its debts before the insolvency.
Partners under a partnership may be liable for the debtor's debts when the company's position has been brought about or worsened by their fraudulent or culpable action unreasonably refuses the credit capitalisation of debts or issuance of securities or convertible securities (and therefore frustrates the possibility of a refinancing agreement being reached) before the partnership becomes insolvent.
New Act No. 9/2015 establishes rebuttable presumptions applicable specifically to the partners. That is, the insolvency will be classified as culpable if no evidence is produced to show otherwise when the partners would have denied, without reasonable cause, to the capitalisation of credits or issuance of shares or convertible instrument and that frustrated the achievement of a refinancing agreement or extrajudicial payment agreement.
If the court finds that partners have acted in bad faith, it can disqualify them from managing partnerships for two to 15 years. It can also require liable parties (or anyone who committed the same offence in the two years before the declaration of insolvency) to repay creditors all or part of any debt that is not recovered from the insolvent estate.
Parent entity (domestic or foreign)
If the parent entity unreasonably refuses the capitalisation of credits or the issuance of securities or convertible securities (and therefore frustrates the possibility of a refinancing agreement being reached) before the subsidiary becomes insolvent, the parent entity may be liable to repay the creditors all or part of any debt not recovered from the insolvent estate.
Setting aside transactions
Challenging pre-insolvency transactions
Some of an insolvent company's pre-insolvency transactions can be set aside (that is, in refund or clawback actions (acciones de reintegración)). Insolvency administrators (see Question 6, Insolvency proceedings (concurso): Supervision and control) can challenge a transaction that both:
Damaged the company's assets (for example, the transaction was at an undervalue).
Occurred in the previous two years.
Fraudulent intent is not required.
A list of prejudice presumptions are ruled on the insolvency act, and depending on the, will be possible submitting or not evidence against such presumptions. However, some transactions cannot be set aside. For example, ordinary transactions done by the company under ordinary conditions warranties constituted in favour of public entities, or refinancing agreements subscribed by the company previously to the insolvency declaration, which cannot be set aside if they either:
Increase the insolvent company's available capital.
Modify the insolvent company's obligations by extending maturity or by replacing the company obligations with new obligations (for example, a new mortgage over property).
It accomplishes some formal requirements as:
being included in a viability plan;
being subscribed by 60% of the creditors; and
including an auditor's certification, formalised in a public deed.
Third parties' rights
If the insolvency administrator (or creditors, if insolvency administrator does not act) can prove that the transaction damaged the company's assets (see above, Challenging pre-insolvency transactions) and occurred in the previous two years, the asset right is recoverable from third parties who participated in the transaction. If it is not possible to reintegrate the assets because they belong to a third party external to the clawback action or party who acted in good faith in the transaction, it is possible to require the value of the asset leave the debtor. However, if the party who contracted with the debtor acted in bad faith, it must indemnify the damages caused.
Carrying on business during insolvency
Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings (Insolvency Regulation) applies in Spain. Spain is also a member of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency 1997 and the Insolvency Act incorporates this.
The declaration of insolvency must, without further formalities, produce the same effects in any other member state that would apply under the law of the state where the proceedings began (Article 17, Insolvency Regulation). This means that court decisions in one member state concerning the opening, conduct and closure of insolvency proceedings must be immediately and automatically recognised by all other member states.
However, the Insolvency Act requires foreign judgments to comply with certain formalities (under the exequatur procedure) before they can be recognised (Article 220, Insolvency Act), including that the:
Insolvency has been declared by a foreign court.
Foreign court's decision is final and binding.
Decision is adopted by the court where the debtor's COMI is located.
Decision is not illegal under Spanish law.
Generally, Spanish courts are required to apply reciprocity when recognising foreign insolvency decisions.
If there are concurrent proceedings relating to the same group of companies, receivers in Spanish insolvency proceedings must co-operate with receivers in the foreign proceedings.
No bilateral treaties apply.
Procedures for foreign creditors
The following procedures apply in relation to foreign creditors:
Receivers must notify foreign creditors of the insolvency.
The court, on its own initiative or at the request of the receivers or of any interested party, can order decisions made during insolvency proceedings to be published in a foreign jurisdiction (in recognition of the fact that certain laws, provisions and acts in Spain must be published in the Official Gazette, the official state journal).
Foreign creditors must submit proof of their debts to the receivers in Spanish.
Foreign creditors can submit proof of their debts in Spanish proceedings, regardless of whether they have also submitted proof of them in a foreign procedure. If there is a reciprocal arrangement between Spain and the foreign jurisdiction, foreign creditors can submit proof of fiscal and social security debts. These rank as ordinary debts in Spain (see Question 2).
If insolvency proceedings have begun in Spain and a creditor is fully or partially paid with assets located in a foreign jurisdiction, the creditor must repay the money to the company's estate.
If a creditor is partially paid during foreign proceedings, the creditor cannot demand any other payment in the Spanish proceedings until other creditors of the same rank have been proportionally paid.
In the Spanish proceedings, foreign receivers (see above, Concurrent proceedings) can submit proof of debts that have been recognised during the foreign procedure (to the extent that this is allowed under foreign law). Foreign receivers can also participate in Spanish proceedings on behalf of creditors for whom they have submitted proof of debts.
Public Bankruptcy Registry (Registro Público Concursal)
Description. Official website. Created by the Justice Administration to provide up-to-date information on any insolvency proceeding in Spain. English translations are not available.
Agustín Bou, Partner
Professional qualifications. Barcelona, Spain, 1982; Madrid, Spain, 1998
Areas of practice. Restructuring and insolvency; corporate and business reorganisations.
- Advice to Plastipak, a leading global manufacturer of rigid plastic packaging, on the purchase of one of the business units of the Spanish listed company La Seda de Barcelona for EUR360 million. The definitive SPAs were signed of 1 July 2015, after obtaining the authorisation of EU and non-EU competent authorities. The transaction has been the largest company acquisition under insolvency in Spain and involved seven jurisdictions.
- Advice to several financial creditors on the steps to be taken if Abengoa files for bankruptcy. Abengoa, one of the largest Spanish listed companies with debts over EUR20 billion, stated in November 2015 that it has entered pre-insolvency protection in order to proceed to a debt restructuring with its financial creditors.
Languages. Spanish, English, French, Italian
- Co-chairing the Section of Insolvency, Restructuring and Creditor's Rights (SIRC) from the International Bar Association (IBA) from 2004 to 2006.
- Member of International Insolvency Institute.
- Participates in several working groups on the European Insolvency Regulation.