Jackson Lewis: Pennsylvania Court Holds Not Returning Employee's Calls is Sufficient for FMLA Retaliation Claim | Practical Law

Jackson Lewis: Pennsylvania Court Holds Not Returning Employee's Calls is Sufficient for FMLA Retaliation Claim | Practical Law

This Jackson Lewis LLP memorandum discusses the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's September 20, 2011 decision in Hofferica v. St. Mary Med. Ctr., holding that an assistant manager's failure to return an employee's calls while the employee was on Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave was sufficiently antagonistic to make a claim for retaliation under the FMLA.

Jackson Lewis: Pennsylvania Court Holds Not Returning Employee's Calls is Sufficient for FMLA Retaliation Claim

by Jackson Lewis LLP
Published on 11 Oct 2011 • Pennsylvania, United States
This Jackson Lewis LLP memorandum discusses the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's September 20, 2011 decision in Hofferica v. St. Mary Med. Ctr., holding that an assistant manager's failure to return an employee's calls while the employee was on Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave was sufficiently antagonistic to make a claim for retaliation under the FMLA.
View PDF