Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause (High Court) | Practical Law

Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause (High Court) | Practical Law

In Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol and another [2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch), the High Court considered if a tenant had complied with a break clause where it had not paid default interest on previous late payments and it made its final payment by cheque.

Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause (High Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-517-2380 (Approx. 6 pages)

Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause (High Court)

by Practical Law Property Litigation
Published on 18 Jan 2012 • England, Wales
In Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol and another [2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch), the High Court considered if a tenant had complied with a break clause where it had not paid default interest on previous late payments and it made its final payment by cheque.
NOTE ADDED 9.1.2013: It is understood that that the parties reached an agreement in court. Therefore, no substantive judgment will be handed down by the Court of Appeal (see Legal update, Avocet v Merol: parties reach agreement in court).