Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause (High Court)

In Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol and another [2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch), the High Court considered if a tenant had complied with a break clause where it had not paid default interest on previous late payments and it made its final payment by cheque.

NOTE ADDED 9.1.2013: It is understood that that the parties reached an agreement in court. Therefore, no substantive judgment will be handed down by the Court of Appeal (see Legal update, Avocet v Merol: parties reach agreement in court).


The full text of this resource is available by logging in or by requesting a trial. If you have any questions, please contact us or your Practical Law Account Executive.

Free trial

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to our online legal know-how services during the trial period
Full training and support
Four issues of Practical Law The Journal, the companion to Practical Law online
Weekly update e-mails on current legal developments in your practice area


Subscribers and trialists can login below

Contact Us

If you need assistance logging in or have any questions about our services, please contact us.

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247579562230", "objName" : "Whether tenant had paid all sums due to comply with break clause", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://us.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/us/resource/7-517-2380?null", "pageType" : "Resource", "academicUserID" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "2cc6ecc1:152c5202835:103e", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "2cc6ecc1:152c5202835:103f", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }