Supreme Court of Victoria considers whether to set aside awards where tribunal refused to reopen case | Practical Law

Supreme Court of Victoria considers whether to set aside awards where tribunal refused to reopen case | Practical Law

In Cameron Australasia Pty Ltd v AED Oil Ltd [2015] VSC 163, the Supreme Court of Victoria considered whether to set aside arbitral awards where the applicant had argued that it had not been able to present its case because the tribunal had not allowed it to reopen and amend its case. It also considered an application to enforce the same awards.

Supreme Court of Victoria considers whether to set aside awards where tribunal refused to reopen case

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-614-7728 (Approx. 4 pages)

Supreme Court of Victoria considers whether to set aside awards where tribunal refused to reopen case

by Nisha Pereira and Juniper Watson, Piper Alderman
Published on 27 May 2015 • Australia
In Cameron Australasia Pty Ltd v AED Oil Ltd [2015] VSC 163, the Supreme Court of Victoria considered whether to set aside arbitral awards where the applicant had argued that it had not been able to present its case because the tribunal had not allowed it to reopen and amend its case. It also considered an application to enforce the same awards.