São Paulo Court of Appeals recognises tacit consensus to arbitrate | Practical Law

São Paulo Court of Appeals recognises tacit consensus to arbitrate | Practical Law

In Marcelo Katsumi Imaizumi and Marcelo Katsumi Imaizumi – EPP v Jin Jin Franchising - Eireli, Appeal No. 4022778-88.2013.8.26.0405, the São Paulo Court of Appeals considered an appeal of a decision to terminate a franchising agreement where an arbitration clause had been entered into between the parties in an unsigned amendment to the agreement.

São Paulo Court of Appeals recognises tacit consensus to arbitrate

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 7-616-3761 (Approx. 4 pages)

São Paulo Court of Appeals recognises tacit consensus to arbitrate

by Eduardo Damião Gonçalves (Partner), Flávio Spaccaquerche Barbosa (Associate) and Mariana Pedrosa Jungstedt (Associate), Mattos Filho Advogados
Published on 09 Jun 2015 • Brazil
In Marcelo Katsumi Imaizumi and Marcelo Katsumi Imaizumi – EPP v Jin Jin Franchising - Eireli, Appeal No. 4022778-88.2013.8.26.0405, the São Paulo Court of Appeals considered an appeal of a decision to terminate a franchising agreement where an arbitration clause had been entered into between the parties in an unsigned amendment to the agreement.